Attack of 'Al-Qaeeda' and Pakistani 'loose nukes'

April 12, 2008.

It is beyond any reasonable comprehension how blatantly obvious the grotesquely unfolding reality in Pakistan is (“Profound Clairvoyance or Blatant Obviousness?”), and yet the Pakistani rulers and the majority of Pakistani ruling elite and its newsmedia still manifestly react as if they are all sitting at the 'unbirthday' tea-party with the 'Mad Hatter' boisterously chanting the imperial 'war on terror' song as they deliberately suicide the nation into oblivion. There isn't much time.

This ominous report “2 die in Pakistan nuclear plant accident” (AP April 08, 2008) will shortly be blamed by the West upon the ubiquitous 'al qaeeda' as having attempted, and perhaps even succeeded in, getting their hands on the Pakistani 'loose nukes'. Unlike the Benazir Bhutto assassination that the Government of Pakistan had immediately blamed upon the 'al qaeeda' (“Who Killed Benazir Bhutto? In her own words!”) with copious help from the Pakistani newsmedia (“Letters to Editors”), this time around, both will surely deny it (irrespective of the facts of the matter which will remain top-secret and continually lied about, subjecting the peoples and the environment in its vicinity to possible radioactive harm; even widespread harm).

If (rather when) this diabolical 'Al-Qaeeda' spin ever materializes in the Western press, be forewarned that the crossing of the nuclear Rubicon which already appears imminent (“Nuclear Attack on Iran appears imminent!”) despite what President George Bush might state publicly, is very close at hand!

For, of course, the immense premeditated build-up for invasion and subsequent “'defensive' US military action” (Brzezinski), must all be made to look un-premeditated. This will of course get little assistance from the ever fertile Straussian minds of the editorial writers who get no free hand in the American press and the newsmedia (sic!), all of which follow the New York Times construction of “all the news that's fit to print”.

And just as abhorrently, this would surely indicate that the new '911', which according to President Bush, “will make Sept. 11 pale by comparison” (NYT Feb. 14, 2008) and that “it would be the work of militants hiding inside Pakistan” (The News April 12, 2008), is also imminent.

But multiple diabolical catalyst provocations such as the loss of the 5th fleet in the Persian Gulf, justifying full spectrum “'defensive' US military action against Iran” and Pakistan as forewarned by Project HumanbeingsfirstTM in its wakeup call of December 21, 2007 (“Wakeup to the grotesque reality of the Grand Chessboard'”) aren't precluded in this calculus of the Fourth Reich for “imperial mobilization”.

And unfortunately, today, there is no Justice Robert H. Jackson to re-assert the definition of “aggressor” to the apathetically spectating world:

'An “aggressor,” Jackson proposed to the [Nuremberg] tribunal, is a state that is the first to commit such actions as “invasion of its armed forces, with or without a declaration of war, of the territory of another State. ...

If certain acts of violation of treaties are crimes, they are crimes whether the United States does them or whether Germany does them, and we are not prepared to lay down a rule of criminal conduct against others which we would not be willing to have invoked against us.” '

Indeed, it is further pertinent to refresh one's imperial memory that the United States Chief Prosecutor at Nuremberg Tribunals had gone on to establish that the overt-acts of aggression, and not the tortuous justifications behind these acts, is what hung the Nazis:

“The intellectual bankruptcy and moral perversion of the Nazi regime might have been no concern of international law had it not been utilized to goosestep the Herrenvolk across international frontiers. It is not their thoughts, it is their overt acts which we charge to be crimes.”

And that these overt-acts of aggression, as argued by Justice Jackson, contained within them the accumulation of “all the evil that follows”. That, the first primal aggression was:

“the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole”.

Thusly, all of the murderous turmoil unleashed in Pakistan since the macho 'commando' President General Musharraf committed the client-state to America's “goosestep[ping] the Herrenvolk across international frontiers”, and the concomitant apportioning of commensurate “supreme” blame for the horrendous toll upon its 'wretched' society, as elsewhere, including Afghanistan and Iraq, Lebanon, and soon in Iran, accordingly, accrues to the account of the sole superpower.

It manifestly constructed its own synthetic 'operation canned goods' as its “new pearl harbor” for the premeditated “supreme international crime” of “imperial mobilization”.

And it will so construct another more devastating “new pearl harbor” once again as the grotesque re-charging of the worn-out “catalyst” for continuing on with its premeditated nuclear plan to “Birth pang” the “Project for a New Middle East”.

This time around, it's destination Tehran via Islamabad. And quite un-cleverly disguised as “'defensive US military action”. But at the 'unbirthday' party, everything absurd becomes reality!

The Pakistani 'loose nukes' hijacked by the cave-dwelling, stick-wielding, suicide-bombing, 'Al-Qaeeda' mantra is among the multiple facile absurdities being deftly primed (and black-ops synthesized) as already outlined in the afore-stated wakeup call. It is one thing for the press and politicians in the pockets of the 'Hectoring Hegemons' (PNAC) to be rehearsing this silly as part of their “intellectual commitment” to seeding “doctrinal motivation” for the 'retaliatory' “patriotic gratification” (Brzezinski). It is quite another for the victims themselves to be bizarrely echoing it. This is yet to be observed in primal nature: lambs arguing for their own slaughter.

Those who naively think that these complicated matters can't be pre-meditated or pre-planned precisely because of the insanity of it, or the incomprehensibility of it in being pulled off in any kind of military precision that's needed, delude themselves for their prized mental acuity, for the hectoring hegemons' is exponentially greater.

This 'ubermensch' breed clearly perceives that “what is inconceivable in normal times is possible in revolutionary times”. It is only in the pain of “Birth-Pangs”, as for any new birth in nature, that the 'New World Order' can be born. The Third Reich wanted it – and failed. The Fourth Reich wants it just as bad, and are indeed playing their game well.

The “Mission Accomplished” sign actually meant what it stated. While most in the mainstream, as well as in the so called 'dissent-stream', derided it in the aftermath of Iraq, little do these gentle-minds perceive the diabolical agenda that was accomplished quite successfully indeed – to set the “Birth-pangs” and labor pains in motion by raping the fertile womb.

That was surely successfully accomplished! One might even wager that it was William Kristol who likely came up with that sign – he seems to be just the type to relish in such devilish play on words (judging from his previous forays into Presidential speech-writing). It can be quite educational to back-read all the Presidential speeches since 2000 and study up on their craftsmen. The Goebbelian craftsmanship creates a Kafkaesque hypnotism over the American masses and its newsmedia.

It is precisely that 'ubermenschen' power that eludes normal peoples who simply can't perceive the depth of evil incarnate which once again besieges mankind. This is why, Leo Strauss, the legatee of the Austrio-Hungarian empire that had seeded Hitler, also only seeded the new 'ubermenschen' into the privileged Nietzscheian class of being 'beyond good and evil' after assurance of their higher intelligence and superiority. As per Plato's philosophy of the philosopher-king wisely shepherding the flock, Straussians merely drop the 'wisely' part. They, in effect, replace it with 'predatorily'. Thus the self-ascribed appellation 'Hectoring Hegemons'.

Such tortuous minds only make tortuous plans that just the sheer boldness of which boggles some moral mind.

It certainly boggles Noam Chomsky's mind – supposedly, the “arguably most important intellectual alive” in all of Western Hemisphere according to the New York Times – that to this day he cannot believe the evidence of his own eyes that the '911' was controlled demolition, and hence by corollary, must have been self-inflicted. He continues to accept the Pentagon's narrative that a guy in the Hindu Kush mountains with cell-phones and box-cutters took down the entire trillion dollar defense system of the world's sole superpower. A fabricated war that is no more abstruse than the Star Wars Hollywood movie episode “Revenge of the Sith”, eludes him as he continually expands on the 'Al qaeeda' and 'OBL' merely seeking revenge for all the horrible crimes of the 'empire'. And he does so after writing almost a million words in a zillion books over half a century about the ex post facto secretive crimes of 'empire', the various magical incantations of its power, and the unraveling of its deception games. It was in the greatest honor of my esteemed professor that I wrote “Responsibility of Intellectuals – Redux” on the 40th anniversary last year of the original's seminal publication. I wonder that if Noam Chomsky had been a non-Jewish German Professor of linguistics living in the Third Reich, would he also have accepted the Reich's explanation of its self-inflicted Operation Canned Goods and the Reichstag fire?

Indeed, if the U.S. Chief Nuremberg War Crimes Tribunals Prosecutor Justice Robert Jackson were alive today, and he hadn't merely been handing out a 'victor's justice' to the despicable harbingers of the Third Reich when he stated the blatant obviousness of their premeditated intent to commit “supreme international crime” of aggression:

“The plans of Adolf Hitler for aggression were just as secret as Mein Kampf, of which over six million copies were published in Germany”,

he would blanketly also re-assert to the equally despicable harbingers of the Fourth Reich the equally blatant obviousness of their premeditated intent to re-commit the same “supreme international crime” of aggression:

The plans of the aggressor for aggression were just as secret as the 'PNAC' and the 'NPR' on the 'Grand Chessboard' that were freely available for download on the Internet, and in major bookstores.

The only difference between the two, as far as anyone can un-emotionally ascertain, and which is amply documented by this scribe, is that the Nazis didn't get the opportunity to re-write history as the present day 'ubermenschen' are busily engaged in doing, with willing connivance of their intellectuals, newspaper editorial writers, various and sundry lower order newsmedia 'circus clowns', even expert 'native informants'.

Furthermore, most obviously, this time around, the vast majority of the Jews and the handful of mastermind Judeofascists among them, are the Reich's best friends, aiders, supporters, sympathizers, and even its overarching master strategists, instead of the object of its wrath! The handful of courageous and inspiring exceptions, gadflies, and men and women of uncommon chutzpah, duly noted.

And finally, the Third Reich never enjoyed the “full spectrum dominance” and un-opposed uni-polar supremacy that enables the present Reich to exert its “Primacy and Geostrategic Imperatives” unfettered and unchallenged as “one centre of authority, one centre of force, one centre of decision-making, ... one master, one sovereign.” (Putin)

With this blatant reality in their faces, the Pakistani rulers can no more claim the 'I didn't know' defense, that, 'oops, we were fooled that this fabricated “war on terror” was real, and we only accidentally wrecked havoc upon our nation – we really only had good intentions as we bombed all those whom we thought were nasty “terrorists” ', any more than the Nazis could for their crimes upon their own disfavored citizenry.

Eichmann in Jerusalem, in his trial, even lent new meaning to the “I was only following orders” mantra, which subsequently became enshrined worldwide as not an excuse to commit crimes against humanity. Most of the former, as well as the newly elected senior Pakistani government leaders and their respective political party senior leadership, not to forget the uniform, will equally hang someday for all the innocent red blood of their own peoples that they have already shed by supporting the American fiction of 'war on terror'.

But they can certainly stop now before more blood apportions to their soul!

Surely in the 'land of the pure' – all believe in a 'soul'? Even Hitler did (“Gott Mit Uns”). And President George Bush surely does too – for by his own admission:

“God told me to strike at al-Qaida and I struck them, and then he instructed me to strike at Saddam, which I did, and now I am determined to solve the problem in the Middle East”!

SO WAKE THE HELL UP AND ACT before his god tells him to 'nookular' strike Pakistan and Iran to solve our problems too. His god loves “'defensive' US military action”.

And as per the Muslim's God – one may yet have a reprieve of one's soul if one paid 'blood money' and fair compensation for inflicting cataclysmic pain and suffering, to the victims' families. It is most assuredly a win-win situation before the inevitable 'oops, too late!' In fact, not urgently acting in accordance with the grotesque reality that is unfortunately only visible on the 'Grand Chessboard' when 'Alice' is wide awake, is a sure lose-lose proposition.

THE SOLUTION-SPACE: The only mechanism outside of the United States of America to arrest its “supreme international crime” of “imperial mobilization” in its tracks*, is either: the SCO immediately transforms into a NATO-like 'attack on one, attack on all' military alliance that includes Iran and Pakistan – which is of course not in the control of the Pakistanis – to construct a détente on the 'Grand Chessboard'; or, the Pakistani rulers urgently implement the strategy outlined in the afore-stated wakeup call. The latter is eminently under the control of the Pakistani ruling elite – to take back this 'wretched' nation from the blood-soaked hands of the 'hectoring hegemons'. And to do it with such astute political ascendance that it inevitably ends up forcing the much needed stalemate on the 'Grand Chessboard'. A task for which Creation itself bestowed the instincts of collective self-defense.

It is the only effective antidote to Zbigniew Brzezinski's 'ubermensch' truism: “Hegemony is as old as mankind.” But the mastermind has certainly also understood that predatory instincts for “primacy” are far older, and so is its full spectrum deterrence, as once again amply reminded by nature itself in this immensely popular 8-minute internet video “Battle at Kruger”.

Let history be witness, if there is anyone left to write it (accurately), that none of this was un-obvious at the time.

* For 'checkmate' by a peoples within the United States, see “How to derail 'imperial mobilization'”

The author, an ordinary researcher and writer on contemporary geopolitics, a minor justice activist, grew up in Pakistan, studied EECS at MIT, engineered for a while in high-tech Silicon Valley (patents here), and retired early to pursue other responsible interests. His maiden 2003 book was rejected by six publishers and can be read on the web at http://PrisonersoftheCave.org. He may be reached at http://Humanbeingsfirst.org.

Copyright Notice:
All material copyright (c) Project HumanbeingsfirstTM, with full permission to copy, repost, and reprint, in its entirety, unmodified and unedited, for any purpose, granted, provided the URL sentence and this copyright notice are also reproduced verbatim as part of this license, and not doing so may be subject to copyright license violation infringement claims pursuant to remedies noted at http://www.copyright.gov/title17/92chap5.html. The rights of the author to express these views are based on inalienable rights noted at http://www.hrweb.org/legal/undocs.html, and to do so freely without suffering intimidation and duress. All quotations and excerpts are based on non-profit "fair use" in the greater public interest consistent with the understanding of laws noted at http://www4.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.html. Full copyright notice and Exclusions at http://www.humanbeingsfirst.org.

© Scoop Media