The Economy: US and the World
"Madness is rare in individuals - but in groups, political parties, nations, and eras it's the rule." (Friedrich Wilhelm
And no madness is worst than greed. Every so often people assume that somehow they can make money out of the thin air.
The most famous one was the Tulip mania of 1636-1637 in Netherland and the most recent one was the “dotcom” bubble of
1995-2001 (on March 10th, 2000 the NASDAQ peaked at 5132.52). Today we are witnessing the beginning of the end of the
real estate bubble.
In every case, the madness begins with those who have high tolerance for financial risk. That is to say they are rich
and can afford greater financial loss than others. They speculate and make money, lots of money. Soon the less wealthy
see this and join the crowd and before you know it the whole country is involved.
When President Bush entered office he gave one trillion dollars (tax cut) to the wealthy. In effect he increased the
tolerance for financial risk of the wealthy individuals and companies even further. Later, he started the Iraq war,
pouring billions of dollars into the economy. One should not forget that when the US government spends about $2 billion
a week in Iraq, most of that money finds its way back into the US economy (salaries, armament, etc). But all these
monies were borrowed money (deficit spending), and all the growth and feeling of well being was illusory.
The money pumped into the economy had to find some channel for investment. So banks and financial institutions began to
push money in hope of getting incredible returns. Easy credit was the solution. You want to buy a house? No problem, we
finance 90% of it. You want to have a new car? No problem, we give you a loan. This push suddenly made it possible for
millions of people to buy houses, putting pressure on the housing market. House prices sky-rocketed, increasing the
illusion of increasing wealth, which in turn allowed people to borrow more money. All the time, banks and credit
institutions were jubilant at the sight of extraordinary returns on their investments. A normal credit company charges
around 18% to 23% on the dollar while they borrow the same money for 8% to 9%. It is a great business. The banks also
had a good time. Cheap money was lent to people backed by assets that were appreciating in value. The risks were spread
by selling mortgages to other banks and institutions. Before you knew it every bank, insurance company and god knows who
else were rushing in to take their piece of the action.
Growth in housing construction represents a substantial part of general US economic growth. So with easy credit and
continuing increase in housing prices, US showed a good growth rate, giving the illusion of well-being.
But as with Tulips and DotComs manias, there comes a time when there is no more room for illusory growth and demand. The
bubble bursts and asset prices crash. The banks are left with depreciating asset guarantees for their loans and before
you know it the whole financial system is in trouble. Usually when this happens, it takes a few years for the companies
and individuals involved to go bankrupt, after which the cycle starts anew. Hopefully with lessons learnt.
But this time it is different. When a recession starts, the government has a few tools at its disposal to deal with the
economic downturn: Interest rate, the budget and war. It reduces interest rates to stimulate economic growth. It can
also start large infrastructure projects such road building, constructing bridges etc, to reduce unemployment and
stimulate the economy (deficit-spending). There is another sure way of kick starting the economy and that is WAR. Wars
are good for businesses and reduce unemployment and stimulate (for US) important parts of the economy.
However, all three tools have been already used prior to the recent recession. US has huge trade deficit and is involved
in two wars (Afghanistan and Iraq). It has also reduced its tax revenues by giving huge tax-cuts to the rich. Large
trade deficit, low tax revenue, tremendous debt, wars and low interest rates make it extremely difficult for the
government to do much to help the economy.
If this was not enough its currency “the mighty dollar” is losing its position as the preferred international reserve
and trading currency. The Federal Reserves keeps pumping dollars into the market, while at the same time keep reducing
interest rates. This means only two things, a devaluation of dollar and an increasing inflation. Countries such as
China, Japan, oil producing countries and others keep their reserves in dollar. These reserves are in the order of
trillions of dollars. Imagine a 15% decline in value of dollar will translate to $150 billion dollar loss for the
Chinese government alone. How long will these countries tolerate this loss is anyone’s guess, but surely there comes a
time when these countries will react and begin to switch to other currencies. It is then that we will see the real
collapse of the US economy.
There is already some ominous sign of this. A few days ago, Venezuela declared that it will no longer sell its oil in
dollars. Currently there are Iran, Venezuela, and Russia that have decided to trade their oil and gas in other
currencies. In addition, some Arab countries have started to de-peg their currencies from dollar. For these countries
peg to dollar has meant importing inflation and they are trying to stabilise their economy. As dollar decreases in value
and more and more raw-material producers switch away from dollar, this de-pegging will only increase.
Let us look at why this happens. China buys oil in Euro from Iran. It then produces gadgets and sells it in dollar.
Naturally the dollar prices of Chinese goods increase. The US and others that use dollar or are pegged to dollar will
see an increase in prices of their imports which is passed to the consumers. This means importing inflation. The
countries that have pegged their currencies to the dollar naturally do not wish to import inflation and cut their loss.
(Please note: raw materials in general are increasing in value, regardless of the currency. There is not enough space
here to discuss this matter in detail)
This will put further pressure on the dollar contributing to its decline. This, of course is not good for the US
consumers. When times were good (illusory) US kept its inflation in check by importing goods from countries such as
China, India, and other places; where imports were paid with dollars. Now some stuff has to be paid for in Yen and Euro
both of which are appreciating in value against the dollar. At the same time oil and gas prices have increased
tremendously, not only in dollar term but also in other currencies. All these things mean that US has to pay many more
dollars for the goods that it imports. In simple terms, US’ inflation is rising rapidly. In my opinion, the US
government is not telling the American people the real truth, fearing further collapse in confidence.
The outlook for the US economy
When recession hits, the government usually starts deficit spending to increase employment. At the same time the
interest rates are reduced to stimulate economic growth. United States is now in an unenviable position of entering
recession with very low interest rates, huge deficit and declining dollar.
Already in August 2006 I warned about the coming financial crisis (please read “U.S. and The Coming Financial Crisis”).
The following is an excerpt from that article: “The current account deficit of over 7 per cent has long passed its
danger levels of 4-5 per cent. In 2005 the U.S. government paid $325 billion dollars only in interest payments alone.
Then there are the future obligations such as Medicare, Social Security and government pensions. These obligations
amount to $54 trillion dollars. This huge problem worried the former Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan. He told
congress: “As a nation, we may have already made promises to coming generations of retirees that we will be unable to
As can be seen the government has not the ability to meet its existing financial obligations to the American people, let
alone starting infrastructure projects to reduce unemployment or help the economy.
With regards to the interest rates, the Federal Reserves has very little room for manoeuvre. Already the real interest
rates are in negative territory (lower than inflation), although the government and the experts say otherwise. Further
interest rate cuts will only increase inflation and devalues the shaky dollar even further. But this is exactly what the
Federal Reserves is doing. This is most likely to rescue big financial institutions, the very institutions that were
earning huge profits from unsuspecting American consumers. In effect, the Fed is abandoning the poor and helping the
rich. If the government was serious in helping the working American, it would have paid the money directly to the
people, so that they could pay their debt. Instead it is pouring hundreds of billions of dollars into the banks. If you
count the monies that have been poured into the financial markets, you’ll see that $160-$200 billion dollar tax rebate
to the people was only mere peanuts as compared to what banks and others have received.
All in all, one can say that this recession, if it doesn’t turn into a depression, will be severe and will last at least
2 to 4 years. Now you must realise that I am talking about the effects of the recession and not technical recession. The
recent technical recessions that we have seen is listed below:
January-July 1980: 6 months (worst quarter GDP Growth -7.8% )
July 1981-November 1982: 16 months (worst quarter GDP Growth -6.4%)
July 1990-March 1991: 8 months (worst quarter GDP Growth -3.0%)
March 2001-November 2001: 8 months (worst quarter GDP Growth -1.4%)
Technically a recession may last one year, but the effect of that recession on families may last a decade. Some lose
their homes, some their jobs, some families will break-up and so on and so forth. The human misery of technical
recession lasts much longer than the recession itself. Anyway, if the price of the houses is dropped by 40% in two
years, how many years of growth will it take to retake that 40%? Usually much longer than people think.
I wrote an article in September 2006 titled “Who Will Pay the US Debt”. In this article I explained who will be most
affected by the coming financial crisis. This is the direct excerpt from that article:
“The truth is that at the end of the day it is the American people that have to pay. This will be in the form of higher
taxes and reduced governmental services. In other words lower living standards. The poor and the working poor do not
have anything to give. Their contribution will be in form of statistics. The number of people living below poverty line
will increase. They will suffer because they rely on many services that will be cut or reduced. The rich will always
find some loop-hole to avoid paying the major part of their share. Even if their wealth is reduced by 10%, they will see
no hardship. This leaves us with the Middle class. This group will be hit the hardest. They will see their taxes and
expenses increase simultaneously. A good portion will have to live on far less than they are used to. Many will work
longer hours just to stay solvent. Many may also join the working poor. It all may sound rather apocalyptic but the
numbers do not lie. Politicians may avoid this problem for now, but sooner or later someone has to pay the piper.”
The World Economy
It is said that when the US sneezes the world catches cold. This was true before but the world has started to think that
it can decouple itself from the US economy. Here the umbilical cord is the US dollar; once that is cut, slowly but
surely the decoupling will take place; with dire consequences for the US. As I mentioned before, already some important
oil producing nations have decided to abandon the dollar. Others have decided to de-peg their currencies. Others such as
China have started thinking about reducing their reserves in dollars. Once others begin to do the same the dollar will
cease to be the international reserve and trade currency of choice. Meanwhile, major trading partners have to just bite
the bullet and accept the consequences of holding to the dollar.
You know the saying that if you owe the bank one hundred thousand dollars you are in trouble, but if you owe the bank
one hundred million dollars, the bank is in trouble. Currently US owes foreigners over two trillion dollars. In addition
many trillions of dollars are also held in foreign central banks. These countries are in trouble and they will try hard
to stabilise the US economy, if only for saving their own money.
But they don’t do this out of love. They just need stability to reduce their dollar holdings gradually and hence save as
much of their reserves as possible. If they mention this openly, the dollar will collapse over-night and they lose. So
the long-term plan would be to reduce their exposure to the dollar as gradually and as quietly as possible. This of
course doesn’t mean that the value of dollar will not fluctuate; it simply means that over time dollar will become just
like any other currencies and will be treated similarly. The Federal Reserves will no longer be able to just print money
and refuse to publish the M3 statistics.
US will also need to begin building reserves in other currencies. Today US dollar has no backing. People accept dollar
on faith alone. Imagine if that faith suddenly disappears. Will you exchange 1 kg of green paper for 1000 Microwaves? I
But meanwhile the world’s economy will experience the negative effects from the US economic downturn. The most affected
areas will be China and other Asian “emerging” economies and European Union.
The case for the European Union is straight forward. A flight from dollar to Euro makes the EU’s export much more
expensive, just when one of its biggest trading partners “US” goes into recession. European Union will also feel the
pains of financial crisis of the US. Many EU financial institutions had invested in US and now they will have to accept
the losses. So we will see a down ward trend in Europe, but not as severe as the one in US. In addition European Central
Bank has still a lot of room for manoeuvre. It can reduce interest rates substantially. EU also has smaller total
deficit than US. Most importantly, most of the EU countries have solid social security nets in place which will dampen
the effects on their citizens.
China on the other hand lacks this social security net, but has large foreign reserves. Most of this reserve has been
the result of its exports. Last year its trade surplus with US was over $200 billion. This surplus will diminish
substantially over the coming year, unless of course the US continues to spend the money that it doesn’t have. But in
general, a recession in US and a slowing economy in EU will impact China negatively. Its exports will decline and its
unemployment will increase, something that the Chinese government is very sensitive to. China suffers from double digit
unemployment rate, something that the Chinese government is reluctant to discuss openly. For example in 2004 the RAND
estimated the actual Chinese unemployment to be 23%. Things haven’t improved that much since then. Even if the
unemployment rate was down to 15%, it still presents a very large number.
So China will most likely embark on large infrastructure projects to keep unemployment levels stable. The government
will also try to improve its social security programs and pay more attention to the interior of the country, where the
benefits of double digit growth has not reached yet. The economic growth will also be reduced to single digits,
relieving some pressure off the oil prices.
India will fare worse than China simply because its population growth is higher than China while it lacks the Chinese
reserves and resources. According to the Indian government forecast, India needs to create 10 million new jobs per year
to keep its unemployment rate steady. But others put that figure at 15 million. An Indian national report on employment
situation has warned that nearly 30% of the country’s 716 million-strong workforce will be without jobs by 2020. This of
course is a conservative estimate based on continued solid economic growth; something that, at least with the current
economic outlook, is highly unlikely.
Stock-market: The Near Term-outlook
The outlook as you have guessed is not good. I have been waiting for this crash since mid 2006 and what kept it from
happening was what Greenspan called the “irrational exuberance” of the investors. The market, especially the US markets,
will plunge further. I see Dow Jones below 11500 and Nasdaq at 1900. The full picture of financial crisis is still
hidden and full cost of the coming bailouts will not be known till autumn.
Of course this is not written in stone. The US government may come to its senses and decides to act responsibly and
allow many companies and banks to go under. It may try to support dollar. It may try to cut the budget deficit or the
trade deficit. It may even decide that its war in Iraq was not and is not such a good idea and withdraw its troops. It
may even try to get friendly with Venezuela and Iran, thereby reduce both the price of oil and pressure on the dollar.
The truth is that it is the US president that can do these things and not the Federal Reserves. We just have to wait for
the elections and see who is elected as the next president.
It is my opinion that no other US president has ever damaged United States as much as George Bush, and he will be
remembered by both the Americans and others as one of the most unpopular US presidents ever. But he is at the end of his
second term and has only a year to destroy the rest of the economy. Let us hope that he will be busy with other things
and doesn’t do more damage. Let us also hope that the American people will not fall for promises of further tax cuts and
glories in battle fields abroad. Neither brings peace and prosperity.
Dr. Abbas Bakhtiar lives in Norway. He is a management consultant and a contributing writer for many online journals.
He can be contacted by e-mail at:Bakhtiarspacefirstname.lastname@example.org
Copyright Abbas Bakhtiar, all rights reserved.