Ibori, Odili: 60 Niger Delta Groups Spoil For War
Ibori, Odili: 60 Niger Delta Groups Spoil For War
Hit FG Over EFCC
by Akanimo Sampson,
Port Harcourt
OVER 60 civil society organisations in Nigeria's oil and gas region, under the platform of the Niger Delta Civil society Coalition, NDCSC, are currently spoiling for war over an alleged ''kid-glove'' handling of the cases of the past governors of the region suspected to have looted public funds. Some of the well known cases are those of Chief James Ibori, and Dr. Peter Odili, all immediate past governors of Delta and Rivers states respectively.
The coalition Chairman,
Anyakwee Nsirimovu, said in Port Harcourt, the Rivers State
capital on Friday, ''NDCSC wishes to express its outrage at
the attempts by sections of those with
constitutional
responsibility for the administration of justice in the
country in using the slogan of rule of law to inflict
injustice on the generality of Nigerians through weakening
efforts by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission,
EFCC, to bring guilty
treasury looters to
justice''.
''We note with dismay that whilst the EFCC, in
spite of obvious odds, has courageously championed an
unprecedented drive to bring looters of our treasury to
justice, the Minister of justice and Attorney General of
Nigeria has paradoxically helped looters to avoid justice by
frustrating and scuttling EFCC efforts using a selective
application of rule of law
as a subterfuge. NDCSC
believes that rule of law must not only be applied to
protect those involved in corruption, but also to ensure
that such people are brought to book'', they added.
In
this respect, the coalition said they are particularly
concerned about the reported role played by the Attorney
General in the on going London court case involving one of
the
past governors of the Niger Delta states alleged to
have amassed wealth capable providing excellent health care
and education for most of the Niger Delta states. ''This
approach negates the Federal Government’s position on zero
tolerance for corruption. It not only
diminishes and
embarrasses us as a people but cast the nation in bad light
in the civilized world besides rubbishing Nigeria’s
efforts against corruption. Facts abound that instead of the
immediate past officials ruling us, they callously ruined us
through bad governance while they corruptly enriched
themselves. Impunity was the name of their rule'', NDCSC
said.
''To compound the trend started by Attorney
General'', they went on, ''we are equally outraged by the
spate of exparte injunctions that have in effect elevated
certain
persons accused of corruption to a position above
the law. We find it unjustifiable that whilst even by the
constitutional immunity granted serving Governors they could
be investigated but not prosecuted whilst serving,
injunctions are now being granted at random barring
investigations of these governors after they have left
office''.
As a group, NDCSC says it believes that
corruption poses a major challenge to good governance and
the attainment of enduring peace in the Niger Delta and
those charged with the administration of justice must also
be seen to be acutely involved in the fight against
corruption, adding, we want to believe that the Attorney
General and those judges involved are aware of the
co-relation between corruption and destitution and violence
in the Niger
Delta.
For the coalition, ''protecting the corrupt is certainly against public good and especially detrimental to the interest of the Niger Delta. The Nigerian government must therefore reassure us by rebuilding our confidence in the government as we feel she is not doing enough to keep our confidence''.
According to them,
''since his appointment, his utterances and actions has not
left most people in doubt about his determination to destroy
EFCC and the anti-corruption war.
Currently, tension is
building in the Niger Delta region as the people are
unanimous that those who have worsened our woes should be
brought to justice.
We therefore, call on the relevant agencies to take steps to stem the tide of hindering the fight against corruption. Not only should the national Judicial Council take appropriate judicial sanctions against the obvious misuse of injunctions in the regard, but considering the corrupt antecedents of the beneficiaries of these injunctions, ICPC should commence appropriate investigations. We equally feel that the Attorney General having lost considerable public in the corruption war should, at best, be reassigned''.