Electronic Voting Switch Threatens Mass Confusion
The Financial Times
Monday 01 May 2006
SEE FULL STORY
HERE:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050206A.shtml
or
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a1b985a4-d960-11da-8b06-0000779e2340.html
The last three election cycles in the US have been marked by controversy not only about candidates, but also about the fairness and accuracy of the voting process. And as voters head to the polls today for primaries in some jurisdictions, the coming cycle promises more of the same.
With about 8,000 separate election authorities managing approximately 175,000 polling places and perhaps as many as 150,000 different ballot forms that include choices for everyone from senator to dogcatcher, American elections are complex even when all goes well. But this cycle sees many states and smaller jurisdictions making last-minute efforts to switch to electronic voting, and early signs of trouble are appearing.
In California, the League of Women Voters has protested against a new, computerised statewide election registry that the group says is improperly rejecting registered voters, while county clerks in several Indiana jurisdictions complained that the electronic ballots programmed by the vendors of their electronic voting machines had been delivered late, were incorrect and poorly proofread.
… SNIP…
SEE FULL STORY
HERE:
http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/050206A.shtml
or
http://news.ft.com/cms/s/a1b985a4-d960-11da-8b06-0000779e2340.html