Proposed Drinking Water Solutions Need Careful Due Diligence
The Public Health Association of New Zealand (PHA) welcomes the Stage 2 report of the Havelock North drinking water
inquiry, but has concerns about some of its recommendations.
PHA CEO Warren Lindberg says that while criticism of the Ministry of Health’s performance may be justified, it was not
the only agency at fault.
“What we have here is the failure of a complex system dependent on a range of diverse entities, so the solution might
not be simply to establish another Crown entity. We’re also concerned to avoid handing the State’s responsibilities over
to its commercial partners.”
Lindberg says criticisms of the Ministry's inadequate staffing, enforcement and technical capacity come after a decade
of deliberate reduction of funding and staffing for public health services.
“The inquiry concludes that the Ministry of Health has inadequate capacity to maintain the effective leadership expected
of it but does not explore the reasons why its capacity is so limited.
“We can infer from comments by the Director General and others in paragraphs 96 and 97 of the report that there’s a
degree of complacency within the Ministry. ‘Red flags’ are said to have been raised but we expect that the Ministry’s
annual reports from 2009-2016 would have raised sufficient ‘red flags’ about under-resourcing for an astute chief
executive and a concerned Minister to have noticed and sought answers.
Lindberg says there can be no guarantee that an ‘independent’ Drinking Water Regulator will be any better than the
Ministry of Health unless it is driven by commitment to public health values of equity and service and is not subject to
the same deliberate parsimony of resources as the Ministry has endured for the last 9 years.
“One of the fundamental principles for drinking water safety management identified by the Inquiry states that Change precedes contamination. This principle applies not only to changes in the physical environment but also to changes in governance and
personnel.
“Government would be unwise to hastily introduce structural change to a complex system without careful and thorough due
diligence.”
ENDS