21 October 2016
Heart Foundation commends ASA for strengthening advertising codes for children
The Heart Foundation welcomes the Advertising Standards Authority’s (ASA) announcement to strengthen the code of
advertising to children, but says the new measures still don’t go far enough.
While the ASA panel reviewed a range of recommendations, the Heart Foundation believes more proposals could have been
adopted to effectively reduce the advertising of unhealthy food and drinks to children.
“Any country that is serious about addressing childhood obesity, especially to the level we have here in New Zealand,
needs to place advertising to children at the top of its agenda,” says Dave Monro, Food and Nutrition Manager at the
Heart Foundation.
“We welcome the review and any tightening of the code, but it needs to go further to helping reduce the negative
influence of powerful marketing and sponsorship,” he says.
The Heart Foundation was hoping the United Nation’s definition of a child as being under 18 would be adopted.
“Creating healthy education environments is a key focus for the Heart Foundation, so we are disappointed to see the new
code still allowing unhealthy food brands to be advertised in high schools and carried on sports gear.
“All environments where children gather should be free from the marketing of unhealthy products,” says Monro.
While he agrees with the increased sponsorship restrictions under the new code, he says this only applies to the
depiction of products and not brands.
“This means high profile sports players, teams and events can still be sponsored by brands that are mostly associated
with unhealthy foods and drinks,” says Monro.
“Given Kiwi children are the third fattest in the OECD, we would encourage our leading sports teams and sporting role
models to consider the products and brands they are promoting to their young fans,” he says.
“While it is commendable that some changes have been made, it is important that all of this is effectively monitored and
evaluated. This is crucial to determine what impact the improvements are making to the exposure of unhealthy food
advertising to children.”
- Ends -