Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

News Video | Policy | GPs | Hospitals | Medical | Mental Health | Welfare | Search

 

ERA Amendment Bill threatens new specialist appointments

30 October 2013

Employment Relations Amendment Bill: Protection of New Hospital Specialist Appointments

ERA Amendment Bill threatens new specialist appointments

Protection for new appointees in their first 30 days

The Employment Relations Act 2000 requires employers such as DHBs to employ new appointees under the applicable collective agreement (where one exists) if they are a union member (eg, ASMS) or, if not a union member, to be offered the same terms and conditions of employment as an individual rather than collective agreement.

This protection is particularly important for senior doctors in DHBs but this retrograde Bill seeks to remove it. We endured bad experiences in the 1990s when no such protection existed and it is unfair for the health system to suffer this again.

With 42% of doctors practicing in New Zealand having gained their primary medical qualification overseas it is likely that at least this proportion, if not higher, work in public hospitals. Medical Council data suggests that the rate for new vocational registrants is around 50%. Further, according to data provided by the Minister of Health to Green MP Kevin Hague under the Official Information Act, 60% of the new hospital doctors since Mr Ryall became Minister are overseas trained. This is trending in the opposite direction of Health Workforce New Zealand Chair Des Gorman’s aspiration to bring this share down to 15%.

The ASMS provides advice to these senior doctors about to take up employment with a DHB. It is hard to over-emphasise how little many of these doctors understand about the New Zealand arrangements for salaried employment. In the pre-ERA era of the 1990s much effort was expended by the ASMS on unravelling some of the confusing, unfair and often counterproductive arrangements that had been arrived at in the early days of their employment.

The loss of this protection as proposed by the Bill threatens to put overseas recruits through a bad experience and become a further disincentive to DHBs ability to recruit quality specialists in a highly competitive international market.


ends

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Culture Headlines | Health Headlines | Education Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • CULTURE
  • HEALTH
  • EDUCATION
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.