Charitable blue collar workers most frequent body donors
Charitable blue collar workers most frequent body
donors: Otago study
Wednesday 17 April
2012
People who donate their bodies to science
are more likely to be blue collar workers who also regularly
give blood, are registered organ donors, and give frequently
to charity, according to an international study led by the
University of Otago.
The survey of more than 200
people registered in body donor programmes took place during
2010 and involved universities in South Africa, Ireland and
New Zealand. The results have just been published in the
scientific journal Anatomical Sciences
Education.
Study leader and Postdoctoral Fellow with
the University’s Department of Anatomy, Dr Jon Cornwall,
says this is the first study to have examined donors'
characteristics in the same year that they registered with a
body donation programme. Researchers initiated the study to
learn more about the types of people who sign up to donate
their bodies.
“While we have many generous individuals wanting to be involved in body donor programmes at present, this may not always be the case. It is important to understand why people make this choice so that if necessary, we can raise programme awareness among the general public.”
Those signing up to the programmes in each of the three centres were asked a variety of questions about their family structure, education, rationale for donating, religion, and even their political affiliations.
Individuals registering with body donation programmes were on average 68 years-of-age in New Zealand and 69 years in South Africa, with Irish donors significantly younger at 60 years of age.
Researchers also found the decision to donate was usually made over a long period of time – often considered for up to 10 years or more. In all three centres, professional people were under represented, with blue collar workers more likely to make the choice to donate their bodies for the benefit of science and medical teaching. The proportion of atheist or agnostic donors was also found to be higher than their respective general populations. Of those respondents that did identify with a religion, Christianity was the most dominant.
Most of those surveyed had partners and children of their own, and had a solid family background with siblings. Respondents were also far more likely than others in the general population to donate blood; they were more likely to agree to donate their organs and to give both money and services to charity. Interestingly, most donors held a moderate or centrist political affiliation.
The body donors represented “an extremely altruistic group of individuals,” says Dr Cornwall.
“We find that these are extremely charitable people who want to give something back to society; they indicated a willingness to give of their time, their money and other belongings – apparently more so than the general population,” he says.
“Most are not alone when they make this decision. They come from solid family structures and consult widely among them, thus contradicting the preconceived notion that body donors are lonely or isolated individuals with no family ties.”
Dr Cornwall says he is a little surprised that fewer professionals, including those working in corporate and tertiary education, chose to donate their bodies to science compared to those in less well paid employment.
This prospective study provides the most reliable
information on the characteristics of body donors ever
gathered.
Dr Cornwall is now leading a larger
international study of body donors involving more than a
dozen centres around the world. This new study will
investigate further how culture and religion may influence
whether people donate their body to science.
Co-authors: Professor Mark Stringer
(University of Otago), Professor Graham
Louw (University of Cape Town), Gary Perry
(University College Dublin).