Tertiary Education Union - Te Hautū Kahurangi o Aotearoa
Unitec bailout points to the need for urgent change
The announcement today that Unitec will likely receive close to a $50 million bailout over the next two years, and the
proposed appointment of a commissioner to steer the institution through a period of extreme financial difficulty, points
to two important lessons – first, that policies of the last National Government are still being felt across the tertiary
sector and are placing many of our public institutions in peril, and, second, that previous managers at Unitec have
failed their students, staff and local community.
Responding to the announcement, the Tertiary Education Union (TEU) said the proposed dissolution of the council and
appointment of a commissioner to run the institution temporarily was, regrettably, a necessary step to ensure future
generations can continue to access life-changing learning opportunities at Unitec. The government’s decision to bailout
the institution was also a welcome sign of Education Minister Chris Hipkins’ ongoing commitment to high-quality
education at all levels and in all communities, the TEU said.
Students and staff at Unitec have shown an enormous amount of strength to continue their learning and teaching in the
face of a litany of poor management decisions, many of which have led to today’s announcement. It is their dedication
and commitment to education that has kept Unitec going - and it is their skill, time and energy that will ensure a
sustainable future for the institution. Today’s announcement can be traced back to the office of the last two tertiary
education ministers, both of whom are responsible for the precarious funding situation many institutions now find
Sandra Grey, national president of the TEU, said “It speaks volumes about what the last National Government did to our sector that our current Education Minister has had
to step in to clear up the mess. He has been taking some great steps towards long-term change for our sector, and I only
hope that the heavy heart with which he must have decided to bailout Unitec does not deter him from the important work
ahead. In many ways it should affirm his decision to change the way our sector is funded, and his work to push for a
broader systemic change that will prevent decisions like this having to be made in future.
“We’d also hold National responsible for laying the ground for many of the terrible decisions Unitec management has made
over the years. Of course, previous managers and council both need to take responsibility for what they have done to
undermine students’ learning – and for the council to need replacing by a commissioner. But National’s policy of forcing
the sector to compete with itself, and to put profits above students, has led to managers prioritising the balance sheet
of the institution over and above its core obligation to teach future generations the skills our nation will depend on.
This needs to change and today’s announcement shows exactly why.”
Notes to Editors
1. The Minister is proposing to appoint a commissioner under section 195D of the Education Act 1989. The Minister's
preliminary view is that dissolving the Council of Unitec and appointing a commissioner under section 195D of the
Education Act is necessary as there is a serious risk to the operation and long-term viability of Unitec, and other
methods for reducing the risk are likely to fail.
If, after considering any submissions from the Council and any other interested parties, the Minister makes a
preliminary decision to dissolve the council and appoint a commissioner, he must:
a) consult with the Council on his preliminary decision (by giving the council at least 21 days in which to respond to
his preliminary decision);
b) consider any submissions made by the Council; and
c) if the Minister decides to dissolve the Council and appoint a commissioner:
1. give notice to the Council that he is dissolving the council and appointing a commissioner;
2. publish a copy of the notice in the Gazette;
3. present a copy of the notice to the House of Representatives; and
4. appoint a commissioner.