Media release 20 January 2016
A billion dollars spent on fees for ‘free education’ since 2000.
Data released today provides further evidence of the growing inequalities in New Zealand education between schools
catering to the wealthiest families compared to those educating New Zealand’s least resourced children. Key issues are:
• While it is a general view that donations “basically keep all schools operating” and allow schools to be “above
average”, in fact over half of all donations went to the 20% of schools catering to New Zealand’s wealthiest communities – meaning that such schools have better
facilities and more opportunities than the average school.
• The bottom 30% of schools, catering for the 300,000 children living in poverty, are unable to get donations
because the families have no ‘extra’ income to pay, thus have no access to the extras that the wealthiest communities
take for granted.
• As was revealed in research last year, as a result of parents choosing ‘up’ socially, the schools in struggling
areas are on average less than half the size of the wealthiest schools, meaning that the extra ‘decile’ funds they
receive have to be directed to meeting basic costs as they have few economies of scale. A lack of donations and high
community needs exacerbates these financial constraints.
The news that schools have taken in more than $1 billion in so-called “voluntary donations” over the past 15 years is
therefore a signal of a need for major policy change in the funding of schools.
Our ‘guaranteed free’ public education system has been consistently eroded over the past 25 years with parents having to
plug the gap between what the government pays to run schools and what schools need to provide high quality education for
all.
New Zealand’s per capita expenditure on education is well below the OECD average, and our ranking on international
scales of student achievement has also fallen consistently since 1990. There is strong evidence that our schools are
lacking the resources they need to provide a world class education without imposing a further burden on parents.
QPEC has consistently called for a ban on schools being able to request donations or subject fees from parents. The
shortfall must come from the government. Unfortunately, schools in the wealthiest areas find it easier to levy a local
tax (albeit one which is, in principle, voluntary) than persuade the government of the need to fully fund schools.
The parental funding figures also show the huge disparity between the Ministry of Education’s approval for parental fees
charged by integrated schools. Integrated schools are usually former private schools which receive full government
funding for their day to day operating expenses but which often have the approval of the Ministry of Education to charge
parents massive fees on top of government funding to allow these schools to keep out children they don’t want.
QPEC wants to see action on school resourcing: more funds for primary and secondary schools; addressing the rich/poor
population disparities; schools no longer required to tax parents to pay for needed resources; a commitment to a modern,
high quality schooling system; and an urgent strategy to properly resource schools catering to our poorest children.