1 February 2015
As predicted, charter schools in trouble
Statement from joint spokespeople
When the government changed the Education Act to allow for charter schools, it bet that a bunch of non-educators using
their own untested theories of education could run schools for our most disadvantaged students and achieve better
results than state schools.
Not only that, it stacked the decks by deliberately removing the charter schools from the checks and balances that all
state schools must face and gave them more money (as a series of set-up grants). For example, these schools are exempt
from making disclosures under the Official Information Act, despite the fact that they are government funded.
The policy was always ideological, always about neo-liberal thinking rather than straight thinking. In Sweden and the
UK, charter school models (free schools) are contributing to the decline of educational outcomes. There are calls for
change in both countries.
In the USA, scandal after scandal has swept charter schools: poor teaching, poor facilities, financial scams,
corruption, profiteering, abrupt closures of failed schools, political patronage, abuse…. Almost everything that could
go wrong in these schools has done so, often over and over again. QPEC has been tracking US charter schools daily for
over two years ago now, and not only are many of them an educational disgrace but they continue to contribute to the
overall educational collapse of the USA in world educational rankings. Per dollar spent, US schools are the world’s
worst.
The public was told things would be different in New Zealand (despite depressingly similar policy settings). But our own
tiny number of such schools have already suffered from student loss, concerns over quality and now a new school is being
led by a principal under investigation by the Teachers Council for potential serious misconduct. This is a clear example
of de-regulation leading to poor practice.
The Minister calls these “teething troubles”.
QPEC calls them an educational disaster in the making, and calls on this government to stop this experiment, which is
following the worst practices of schools internationally and will not improve outcomes for the most disadvantaged.
There is no empirical research that supports this model of charter schools, and plenty of evidence against the model. It
is being driven by the first term right wing ACT MP, David Seymour, who promises to support these schools through thick,
thin and very expensive, success or failure – competition at all costs, and the taxpayer must pay.
ENDS