Rugby needs to be taken seriously as shaping NZ’s society
Rugby needs to be taken seriously as key to shaping
NZ’s society
June 2, 2013
Rugby
is just as much a religion in New Zealand today as it was 30
years ago, a University of Canterbury (UC) sociology expert
says.
Associate Professor Mike Grimshaw, who
studies religion, believes rugby is a different type of
religion than it was, but much of the change has been in the
way New Zealand experiences rugby.
``It is a
transnational experience via mass media and the way Super 15
rugby brings overseas teams to us. Like all religion it
has become part of an on-going series of lifestyle choices
fitted in among other competing choices. But changes don’t
diminish the religion for those who participate in
it.
``The All Blacks’ success on the world stage
is still central to national pride. But this is always
tempered by the ongoing scabs of playing against South
Africa in the apartheid era, culminating in the 1981
Springbok tour.
``When the national pride becomes
a form of almost totalitarian demand then the nationalism of
rugby needs to be critiqued as any fundamentalism
does.
``Sky television is changing rugby. The professional
game here would not exist without Sky. What we are seeing is
what happens more broadly with all such religions. The
supermarket of faiths means one increasingly picks and
chooses one’s involvement, as a spectator or fan alongside
a number of other choices.
``It is increasingly
similar to what sociologists of religion have termed
believing but not belonging. In this case, we may still be
believers in rugby but also believers in a number of other
activities that give meaning and sustain us. Just because we
don’t turn up to or tune into every game doesn’t mean we
no longer believe.’’
Professor Grimshaw has recently
had a paper on rugby, The Oval Opiate, published in the
International Journal of Religion and Sport.
He
says academics generally don’t rate or recognise rugby,
especially those in the humanities and social sciences.
Sport is either seen as not worthy of serious
thought and consideration as it is seen as frivolous, or
it becomes viewed as expressing all that is problematic with
modern society, Professor Grimshaw says.
Many
academics consider people involved in or who play rugby as
less-intellectual types. There is a long line of left-wing
academics celebrating soccer.
``But rugby in New
Zealand is almost totally overlooked or analysed as a
problem first and foremost. Unfortunately, many who do the
arts don’t or didn’t play rugby and so start from a
position of opposition or indifference. The attitude toward
rugby people, as rugby-heads, still continues.
``We need
to start taking sport and rugby seriously in New Zealand as
a means of engaging with and understanding our society.
``We need more and better studies of sport in this
country. Studies that take sports, and those who play and
support sports, seriously. The joy and meaning of rugby is a
book that needs to be written,’’ Professor Grimshaw
says.
ENDS