TEU Tertiary Update Vol 13 No 47
Could trade agreement let for-profit US universities sue NZ polytechnics?
The government is currently negotiating, in secret with eight other countries, the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement (TPPA). This proposed agreement will dramatically increase the ability of private foreign firms, including tertiary education providers, to sue future New Zealand governments and New Zealand public tertiary institutions.
TEU national president Dr Tom Ryan
says that for-profit universities in the United States are
becoming increasingly aggressive in their attempts to
increase their share of both the domestic USUS market and
overseas markets.
Recently, for-profit Keiser
University lodged
a lawsuit against the community college Florida State
College, alleging that negative public comments by staff at
the college devalued Keiser's share price and reduced its
enrolments. Keiser subsequently withdrew its lawsuit after
the two institutions "agreed to put their differences behind
them." Florida State College also told the media it "never
intended to disparage Keiser University or its principals or
to cause harm to the institution."
"If we are not
careful, foreign investment rules in the TPPA could give
for-profit institutions s from the United States, or other
countries, the right to sue New Zealand tertiary
institutions for making it hard for them to do business
here," said Dr Ryan.
"The agreement might
include rules governing the monitoring of academic quality,
institutions, qualifications their staff should hold, or the
content of the courses they offer. Once TPPA investment
rules are set they cannot be reversed, and as Keiser
University showed, for-profit institutions will use rules
like these aggressively."
NZQA has already said
it is providing support as required for the TPPA
negotiations as the agreement may include qualifications
recognition clauses.
Inside
Higher Ed notes that American for-profit
universities are increasingly active outside the United
States and offer many on-line
degrees internationally. They are also buying or
starting universities in other countries, linking with
overseas institutions. For example, the University of
Liverpool in the UK is the partner of Laureate Education, a
large US for-profit, and works with Laureate on many on-line
degrees). The US for-profits also offer many on-line
degrees internationally.
For more on
for-profit universities, check out Stephen
Colbert's analysis of the sector in the
USA.
Also in Tertiary Update this week:
- Otago Uni sacks people who deliver government tertiary strategy
- Weltec staff opposed to 55 more hours a year
- NZQA takes over quality assurance of polytechnics
- Retirement Commission wants to raise retirement age
- Clarification
- Other news
Otago Uni sacks people who deliver government tertiary strategy
The Otago Daily Times reports that the Foundation Studies Ltd company owned by the University of Otago is preparing for a second round of redundancies.
The company, which
offers English language and general tuition to international
and domestic students, cut 3.6 positions in August. Now it
is reviewing management and support positions.
The Otago Daily Times has been told at least three
further positions will go, but the company's board
chairperson, Ian Simpson, said he could not confirm that.
The review would be completed before the end of the year, he
said.
TEU national president Dr Tom Ryan said
these cuts undermine one of goals of the government's
Tertiary Education Strategy, in that the TES aims to get
more young people, Māori, and Pasifika people into tertiary
education.
"It really is a catch-22 situation.
Foundations studies course like this are integral to the
success of government's own tertiary strategy, and yet staff
are being made redundant because of the government’s cap
on student numbers."
Foundation Studies at Otago
University has had its domestic student places cut by 44
percent next year. Because most of the courses at Foundation
Studies are less than a full year, and it takes several
students to make up one student place, the reduction will
affect hundreds of students.
Many of the
subsidised places have been filled by students who had not
performed well enough at school to obtain university
entrance and have previously needed a one-semester intensive
boost to make the grade. Asked what would happen to those
students, Mr Simpson said they would "have to make sure they
passed UE at school" or wait until they were 20 and apply
for a university place as an adult student.
Dr
Ryan said that government decisions were undermining the
government's own strategic goals.
"The
students that the government says it most wants tertiary
institutions to take in are also the ones that it attaches
the least funding value to. The situation simply doesn't
make sense."
Weltec staff opposed to 55 extra hours per year
TEU members at Weltec are currently voting on whether to begin industrial action because their employer is trying to increase their duty hours from between 34 and 36 hours a week (which are core conditions across the sector), to 37.5 hours a week.
Weltec's proposal claim for increased duty
hours, in exchange for a 1.5 percent pay rise, would result
in up to 55 extra hours of work a year for staff
members.
Weltec wants claiming an increase the
duty hours in order to boost productivity. However, Weltec
already has one of the highest student-staff ratios in the
country; 24 students for each academic staff
member.
TEU organiser Phil Dyhrberg said the
union has been willing to discuss so-called productivity
improvements, including possible changes to duty hours and
timetabled teaching hours, but members have already formally
rejected the employer's arbitrary increase of duty
hours.
The ballot on industrial action will close
at 4pm today.
"I think it is regrettable, given
members' willingness to negotiate on these matters, that
Weltec is insisting on attacking core conditions. TEU
members are already angry about the manner in which trade
tutors were recently laid off at the polytechnic," said
Mr Dyhrberg.
NZQA takes over quality assurance of polytechnics
From next year the Qualifications Authority (NZQA) will assume direct responsibility for quality assurance of institutes of technology and polytechnics, taking over the role from ITP Quality, which has held the responsibility since 1993.
The Minister for Tertiary Education,
Steven Joyce, said ITP Quality has voluntarily returned the
delegation for quality assurance to NZQA.
"The
benefits of strong, independent quality assurance across the
tertiary sector will help maintain and further improve
confidence both here in New Zealand and
internationally."
A dedicated unit to provide
services to the ITPs will be established within NZQA. The
unit will undertake course approvals, degree applications
approval and external evaluation and reviews of individual
ITPs. An ITP Advisory Forum will also be established to
provide advice to NZQA.
The unit will undertake
course approvals, degree applications approval, and external
evaluation and reviews of individual ITPs. In addition, an
ITP Advisory Forum will be established to provide advice to
NZQA on the quality assurance of the sector.
NZQA
currently manages quality assurance for the PTE sector and
for wānanga. The university sector retains responsibility
for its own quality assurance.
TEU’s ITP
academic vice president, Richard Draper, said there was
considerable disquiet about this proposal when it was first
mooted. He said many in the sector were concerned that NZQA
was not in the best position to assume this responsibility
in terms of staffing and expertise.
"It is a
consequence of the unfortunate decision of the CEOs of the
'metro' group of polytechnics to split from ITPNZ in 2009.
ITP Quality is an independent committee of ITPNZ. Although
all of the polytechnics were keen to see ITPQ continue in
its role, when ITPNZ split into the newly formed NZITP and
the 'metro' group has clearly, it undermined the position
of ITPQ. It is no great surprise to see this change."
Retirement Commission wants to raise retirement age
TEU president-elect Dr Sandra Grey says that, if the retirement age increases to 67, New Zealand needs to start working to get rid of age discrimination in the labour force.
"People who
are made redundant or wish to change jobs in their 50s and
60s find it hard in many cases to get a new position," said
Dr Grey. "There is already significant age discrimination
against many workers and this will be heightened in a tight
labour market. If we're going to have people working longer,
then employers need to realise the benefits of employing
older workers."
Dr Grey's comments follow a call
by the retirement commissioner, Diana Crossan, to increase
the age of entitlement for superannuation from 65 to 67
to ensure it remains affordable over the long term. Ms
Crossan says the age of eligibility should start to increase
from 2020 by two months per year, until 2033 when it would
reach 67.
She also advocates a means-tested
benefit, to help people such as manual workers who can no
longer realistically work after the age of 65, to cope
financially until they turn 67.
Dr Grey said
means-tested benefit this could be particularly hard on
those workers in the tertiary education sector who do manual
labour – such as cleaners and caretakers.
The
Council of Trade Unions secretary, Peter
Conway, says that the proposal to remove universal
entitlement at age 65 and replace it with a selective
means-tested benefit for some people until they are 67
represents a major change to the notion of a universal
entitlement.
"There is a case for additional
support – such as subsidised power bills – for those on
low incomes, but not for any removal of basic entitlements.
The fundamental problem is that we have low wages and that
translates into low savings. That is what needs to be
addressed, rather than reducing incomes and entitlements in
retirement," said Mr Conway.
Clarification
"Cutting budgets won't necessarily save money" the headline of our article on Dr Rosenberg's comments last week was misleading. The statement in the story "there is no evidence that cutting spending is actually saving money" did not accurately reflect Dr Rosenberg's comments either. Dr Rosenberg's actual point was that cutting government spending isn't necessarily a cure to a range of economic problems despite being commonly sold as that. As he said, "the evidence that smaller government as such is better for growth or innovation or quality of life is simply not there". However, Dr Rosenberg notes that cutting expenditure may lower revenue requirements or help pay off debt and that will sometimes be necessary. His full commentary, upon which our story was based was confronting the notion that 'smaller government is necessarily better government'.
Other news
EIT chief executive Chris Collins said that, other than the positions of Tairāwhiti chief executive Judy Campbell and five members of her senior management team, there would be no more redundancies in the short term as a result of the EIT-Tairāwhiti merger. Mr Collins says he will hire extra academic staff to teach new programmes in Gisborne –Dominion Post
TEC Chief Executive Roy Sharp has
announced his retirement, as of 3 April next year, the day
he turns 65 –Education
Directions
TEU members and staff in the
library and IT at Victoria University have this week invited
to complete a pay and employment equity survey. The survey
is a critical element of the limited pay and employment
equity (PaEE) review that the university is undertaking to
determine whether women's employment opportunities and
rewards in those two areas of the university are affected by
gender. The review is part of ongoing PaEE work in the
sector, continuing despite the government's closure of the
PaEE unit in the Department of Labour.
---
TEU Tertiary Update is published weekly on Thursdays and distributed freely to members of the Tertiary Education Union and others. You can subscribe to Tertiary Update by email or feed reader. Back issues are available on the TEU website. Direct inquiries should be made to Stephen Day, email: stephen.day@teu.ac.nz