“Nanny State” worries trump child health in smokefree policymaking
Despite strong public and smoker support for smokefree area changes, research from the University of Otago, Wellington
indicates that New Zealand politicians and health officials prefer education to protect children, not regulation.
The findings emerge from a new study examining influences on smokefree area policy development, in which Department of
Public Health researchers Helen Wilson and Dr George Thomson analysed interviews with 62 politicians and senior
officials.
Dr Thomson says the reluctance to regulate appears to be because of fears of the politics involved, including ‘nanny
state’ worries, and because politicians and policymakers are generally not aware of the strong support for change.
“While the majority of those interviewed perceived the issue of smokefree public areas as highly controversial, the
reality is that recent research shows, for instance, that more than 65% of smokers, and 75% of the New Zealand public,
think smoking should not be allowed at public playgrounds.”
Other research in 2008 found that 96% of New Zealand smokers support banning smoking in cars carrying pre-school
children, he says.
The current study indicates that politics generally came before evidence in deciding policy and that concern for smokers
often came before concern for children, he says.
“This shows that policymakers would benefit from a greater appreciation of how overwhelmingly acceptable New Zealanders
now find the idea of such smokefree law changes.”
The research was published in the international journal Health Policy and was funded by the Health Research Council of
New Zealand.
ENDS