Why NZ must rapidly halve greenhouse emissions
MEDIA RELEASE
Friday 9 October 2009
“The
pace of climate change is accelerating. We have overspent
our atmospheric resources—and now need smart sustainable
solutions.”
‘Halving the current level of
emissions is urgent, responsible, just, and possible.
Inaction would be negligence and malpractice on a global
scale” says the newly formed NZ Climate and Health group.
Writing in today’s New Zealand Medical Journal,
around 100 concerned health professionals state that
“doctors have a professional duty to work to tackle
climate change.”
“Climate change has been
described as the biggest global health threat of the 21st
century, and the substantial health benefits of action
should be fully included in decision-making, as should the
harms of inaction,” says spokesperson Dr Alex
Macmillan.
“At present New Zealand has the fourth
highest greenhouse emissions per person of any developed
country. “
“On grounds of fairness, and
responsibility for past emissions, New Zealand should take
it’s share in setting climate change targets. This means
aiming to at least halve our present levels by 2020 (40+% of
1990 levels). This is necessary, based on powerful
scientific and ethical arguments,” she says.
“If
anything a target of halving is too little. Climate change
is moving even faster than has been predicted by the worst
projections of the 2007 IPCC assessment, and things are
going to get substantially worse than has been anticipated.
Reducing the risk of catastrophic climate change may require
even deeper cuts.”
The NZ Climate and Health group
says however there is a silver lining on the particularly
dark cloud of climate change. Responsible emissions
reduction presents unrivalled opportunities to improve
population health, according to Professor Alistair Woodward.
Policies to reduce greenhouse gas emissions could
also bring about substantial reductions in heart disease,
cancer, obesity, diabetes, road deaths and injuries, and air
pollution.
The group refers to the recent high
profile review in the prestigious UK medical journal The
Lancet which discussed at length the major threats—both
direct and indirect—to global health from climate change.
These include profound threats to food and water
supplies, conflict and health problems associated with the
displacement of large populations, more severe natural
disasters, and increases in serious infectious
diseases.
The costs of reducing greenhouse emissions
are affordable, the group argues, and have been widely
overstated in public debate. In arguing that the costs of
not acting are much higher they quote the World Bank’s
warning that “while financial crises may cause serious
hardship and reduce growth over the short to medium term …
the threat of a warming climate is far more severe and
long-lasting.”
They also note that the World Bank
has called for advanced countries, which have produced most
of the greenhouse gas emissions of the past, to act now,
cutting their emissions aggressively and helping the poorest
and most exposed countries to adapt to the changing
climate.
“As health professionals and scientists,
who continue to access the latest scientific findings about
climate change, we’re gravely concerned about the
consequences for human health and in fact survival,” says
Professor Philippa Howden-Chapman.
“New Zealand
doctors and nurses have gone to Samoa to help our Pacific
neighbours living on low-lying islands. But weak targets and
weak policies, such as the Emissions Trading Scheme as
currently proposed, will be far more damaging in the medium
and long-term that any single tsunami. We must act now if we
are to save vulnerable lives,” she says.
Finally,
the group says that to delay action while waiting for
technological innovation is unacceptable. Large reductions
are achievable if we mobilise New Zealand society and let
technology follow a responsible target and realistic fiscal
signals.
NZMJ Special Article at http://www.nzma.org.nz/journal/122-1304/3827/
NZ Climate and Health http://http://www.nzchg.webs.com
(interim site, under development)
Key
messages:
* Drs/health professionals care,
*
Drs/health professionals speak out,
* there are good
reasons to halve our current emissions,
* we need to be
fair,
* we are all in this together, and
* halving
of emissions is urgent and doable.
Background
notes:
The article has been published in the New
Zealand Medical Journal as a Special Article, with 100
health organisations, senior doctors and others speaking out
as authors or supporters. They comprise senior doctors
including professors of medicine, surgery and public health,
public health physicians, other specialists and general
practitioners, and other doctors/health
professionals.
At international climate change
negotiations New Zealand is currently pushing for 10-20%
cuts by 2020, and may sign up to no cuts if conditions are
not met by other countries (http://adoptanegotiator.org/2009/10/02/guest-tracker-sitting-down-with-new-zealands-climate-ambassador-adrian-macey/).
NZ needs to do more to adequately respond to the
climate change threat. It is essential to avoid the worst
impacts of climate change on human health, both here and
internationally. New Zealand should at least halve its
greenhouse gas emissions by 2020—that is, a target of at
least 40% less than 1990 levels.
The 40% target on
1990 levels (halving of current levels) is based on the need
to limit global warming to 2oC by 2100, New Zealand’s
cumulative emissions, and our capability to mitigate these
emissions, compared with other countries This is described
by Oxfam International (see http://www.oxfam.org/en/policy/fair-climate-deal-copenhagen
page 11 for more details).
The New Zealand
Climate and Health Group is continuing to gather support
from individual health professionals and professional bodies
as the international groundswell of health professional
advocacy around climate change grows. We will continue to
advocate for policies that adequately address climate
change, that align with equity goals and that maximise the
co-benefits for health in the medium and long
term.
ENDS