AUS Tertiary Update
National policy set to undermine public tertiary
education
The National party appears intent on
undermining the planned provision of public tertiary
education, with an announcement today that, if elected to
government, it will provide at least $6 million in capital
funding to a South Auckland education centre to establish a
trades’ academy. According to National party leader John
Key, it will be one of at least five trades’ academies
that National will establish in the next three years.
The
announcement follows earlier suggestions by the National
party’s tertiary-education spokesperson, Dr Paul
Hutchison, that public and private tertiary-education
providers should compete for funding to run the same or
similar courses.
Both the Association of University Staff
and Association of Staff in Tertiary Education (ASTE) have
slammed this week’s announcement, saying that it shows
that the National party is on an ideological course to
return the tertiary-education sector to a free-for-all
competitive environment.
AUS acting general secretary,
Nanette Cormack, says that, while it is important that
high-quality trades’ training is provided, it needs to be
delivered as part of a cohesive package of tertiary
education through the many public tertiary-education
institutes that already exist throughout the
country.
ASTE national secretary, Sharn Riggs, said that
considerable time and effort had been spent over the last
few years developing a tertiary-education strategy that is
responsive to the economic and social goals and needs of the
country, and ensuring that the component parts of the sector
complement rather than unnecessarily compete against each
other. “Mr Key clearly wants to return to the uncontrolled
and deregulated practices of the past and, as such,
illustrates that the National party cares more about its
private-sector friends than in the quality and relevance of
tertiary education,” she said.
AUS and ASTE have
produced an election guide to tertiary-education policies
for the forthcoming general election. The guide summarises
the positions of the Act, Green, Labour, Māori, National,
NZ First, Progressive, and United Future parties. It is
available only to members of the two unions from local AUS
and ASTE branches.
Also in Tertiary Update this
week
1. National says it will improve tertiary
education
2. Massey a “defining
university”?
3. Students critical of “National’s
surrender”
4. New Zealand’s first associate dean
Pasifika
5. Another blow to
privatisation
6. Four-university postgraduate programme
in Europe
7. Academic divide linked to
divorce
8. Academic liberalism not
contagious
9. Nietzsche ist tot
National says it will
improve tertiary education
National party
tertiary-education spokesperson Paul Hutchison said in a
press release yesterday that, over the past nine years,
Labour’s approach to tertiary education has lurched from
allowing uncontrolled funding and arbitrary growth in
low-quality courses, through to heavy-handed centrally
driven control. “National will seek a better balance
between, on the one hand, freeing up education providers to
innovate and respond to economic and community demand and,
on the other, ensuring the government has certainty about
overall levels of spending,” he is quoted as saying.
Mr
Hutchison added that National will ensure, through clear
funding signals and spending controls, that providers of
education and training are encouraged to offer the courses
the economy needs and that students want, not the cheapest
courses that attract the most government funding and are the
easiest to run. It will also retain restrictions on the
amount by which institutions are able to annually increase
fees for publicly funded courses.
Arguing that the
Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) has grown into a large
and demanding agency that places an excessive compliance
burden on education providers and stifles innovation, Mr
Hutchison said that National will clarify the role of the
TEC, trim its bureaucracy, and streamline its functions and
ensure that information collected by the government about
the quality of publicly funded tertiary courses is made
readily available to the public. This will include, for
example, completion and retention rates.
Mr Hutchison
added that National will target specialties and
qualifications of which the country is in need and repeated
National’s commitment to retain interest-free student
loans, CPI indexation of loans for living costs, and the
introduction of a 10 percent repayment bonus for graduates
who make voluntary repayments.
Massey a “defining
university”?
Arguments between Auckland and Otago as to
which is New Zealand’s leading university may be a thing
of the past if a new development at Massey is anything to go
by. At his recent welcome to the university’s Wellington
campus at Kuratini marae, new vice-chancellor Steve Maharey
advanced the idea of Massey as “New Zealand’s defining
university”.
As an indication of what such a role may
entail, Mr Maharey explained, “By 2020 [Massey] will be
known as a university that embraces change, is ambitious,
with a Massey-first attitude, innovative, a New Zealand
style, looks for opportunities, works collegially and has
autonomy to be its own boss.”
He suggested that it is
Massey’s multi-campus character, with sites at Albany,
Palmerston North, and Wellington, that makes it uniquely
placed to make an impression nationally. “It’s the only
one which qualifies as a multi-campus, and that makes it a
New Zealand university,” he said.
In welcoming Mr
Maharey to the Wellington campus, Massey chancellor Nigel
Gould described the university council’s decision to
appoint Mr Maharey as relatively easy. “He showed clear
strengths and passion, and over his almost twelve-month
induction has had the energy and capability to look at
developing a strong strategic base,” he
added.
Questioned as to his role as vice-chancellor on
the national stage, Mr Maharey declared that his former
perspectives a a tertiary-education minister would not
inhibit his support for his fellow vice-chancellors in
securing more funding for the tertiary-education sector.
“Would I be as critical?” he asked. “Yes. I work for a
university now. They don’t expect me to just sit back and
keep the peace.”
Students critical of “National’s
surrender”
Auckland students are highly critical of
what they describe as “National’s surrender” on
student support this week. The criticism comes in response
to National saying that it is unlikely to make an
announcement about its student-allowances policy before the
election, instead hinting at changes in the 2009 Budget if
elected.
“National party spokespeople have repeatedly
stated to students at various debates over the past year
that National’s tertiary-education policies were yet to be
finalised and would be announced closer to the election,”
said David Do, president of the Auckland University
Students’ Association (AUSA). “In response to Labour’s
universal-allowance announcement three weeks ago, National
said they would announce a more generous scheme but that it
won’t be universal,” Mr Do said.
“This
announcement shows their past statements to be disingenuous
and reveals a policy vacuum in this economically and
socially significant policy area. Political parties are
supposed to bring their policies to the electorate before
polling day, not make them up afterwards. This is simply
unacceptable,” Mr Do added.
“On the issue of
tertiary education, National appears bereft of ideas:
delivering nothing to address students’ financial
situations, and nothing to address underfunding of
universities and polytechnics,” Mr Do continued.
AUSA
is worried about what National might do to tertiary
education if it is elected. “In the 1990 election,
Lockwood Smith promised to resign if National did not
abolish tertiary-education fees if elected to office.
Neither occurred. Can National really be trusted on tertiary
education?” Mr Do asked. “AUSA calls on the National
party to be transparent with the public and release its
tertiary-education policy before the election,” Mr Do
concluded.
New Zealand’s first associate dean
Pasifika
In what it believes is a first for New Zealand,
the University of Auckland has appointed Dr Meaola
Amituanai-Toloa to the position of associate dean Pasifika
in its faculty of education. Although other tertiary
institutions have appointed associate deans to focus on
Māori and equity issues, the university says, an equivalent
position dedicated to the academic support and achievements
of Pacific Island students has not previously existed.
The appointment is said to be an integral part of the
university’s dedication to improving educational outcomes
and opportunities for Pacific peoples. It also reflects the
leadership role played by the faculty of education (formerly
the Auckland College of Education), which boasts the first
Pasifika early-childhood education programme at diploma and
degree level; the first graduate-studies programme and
qualification in Pacific-languages education and in Pacific
bilingual education; and the first Pacific-focused services
for academic achievement. The faculty also has the largest
team of Pacific education academics in New Zealand.
Dr
Amituanai-Toloa says that she sees her role as a bridge that
connects the myriad of schools in the faculty of education,
all of which aim to help future teachers raise student
achievement. She believes that, given the growing diversity
of the school population in New Zealand, it is increasingly
important to research the best ways to teach students from
different ethnic backgrounds, especially Pacific students.
“The Pacific Island population is increasing in New
Zealand. Our greatest challenge is to think about teaching
in innovative ways to enable these students of today to
realise their full potential and participate fully in our
country’s future. It is a huge undertaking and, in the
establishment of this role, the University of Auckland has
shown it is committed to the challenge,” says Dr
Amituanai-Toloa.
World Watch
Another blow to
privatisation
Staff and students at Britain’s
Goldsmiths College have issued a resounding rejection of
proposals to privatise the recruitment and teaching of
international students through INTO University Partnerships,
a private company which offers English language courses and
international student management. In an online poll hosted
by the University and College Union (UCU), staff and
students were asked what effect they thought a joint venture
would have on the academic reputation of the college.
A
total of 764 staff and students at Goldsmiths participated
with 720, or 94 percent, of those voting saying a joint
venture with INTO would adversely affect its academic
reputation and 702, or 92 percent, saying they thought it
would adversely affect the college’s reputation as an
employer. The online poll formed part of the campaign by
Goldsmiths United Against INTO, uniting staff and
students’ unions on the campus against the threatened
privatisation.
A similar poll at Essex University, in
which 90 percent of voting staff said that the university
would be damaged by a joint venture with INTO, led to that
university announcing that they would not be proceeding with
a joint venture. An earlier UCU campaign at Oxford Brookes
also led to the withdrawal of that university from
negotiations with INTO.
Commenting on the result at
Goldsmiths, UCU general secretary Sally Hunt said, “This
result shows that whenever and wherever university staff are
asked they are overwhelmingly against these joint ventures
which privatise academic departments and reduce staff
working conditions. Goldsmiths is a special place with a
unique ethos and I hope that the warden will listen to the
college community and join the growing number of
universities to reject privatisation,” Ms Hunt
concluded.
Four-university postgraduate programme in
Europe
A new postgraduate course on European civilisation
has been established by four of the oldest and most
traditional universities across Europe. The aim is to give
students the opportunity to approach the subject from a
multicultural standpoint within an overall international
co-operation programme.
The four universities
participating are the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
in Greece, the University of Bologna in Italy, the
Université de Haute-Alsace, Mulhouse, and the Université
Marc Bloch, Strasbourg, in France. The agreement on academic
co-operation was signed at the University of Bologna last
month by the four university rectors.
The new, two-year
postgraduate programme will be taught in the Greek, Italian,
and French languages. Students will attend classes in either
two or three universities, giving them the opportunity to
acquire double or triple special qualifications.
“It is
with a great deal of satisfaction that the Aristotle
University of Thessaloniki is co-operating academically with
three of the oldest and more traditional universities of
Europe in a common postgraduate programme whose basis is the
European civilisation and the European approach to
philosophy, life, and generally social attitudes,” said
Professor Anastasios Manthos, rector of Aristotle
University. “It is a co-operation which confers added
value to research activities and that has a far greater
importance because these activities concern the whole of the
humanities, the sciences, and European
civilisation.”
It is believed that the initiative of
these four universities may open the way for similar
programmes and study schemes in other areas of higher
education by other universities in the future.
From Makki
Marseilles in University World News
Academic divide linked
to divorce
Women with tertiary education who choose men
who have not finished high school as partners are ten times
more likely to separate or get divorced than women whose
education is less than or equal to that of their partners.
The finding is contained in a new study by researchers at
the Australian National University commissioned by the
federal government, which looks at the factors behind the
break-up of Australian families with children.
“Compared to couples in which partners had similar
levels of educational qualifications, those couples in which
women reported tertiary-education qualifications and men
reported not completing high school had a tenfold greater
risk of divorce/separation,” the report says. “This may
reflect two factors. Firstly, women’s educational
attainment may be a proxy for financial independence and,
thus, the opportunity for women to support themselves
outside of the marriage. This removes a potential barrier to
divorce or separation.”
“Secondly, these couples may
experience greater conflict or dissatisfaction within the
relationship, perhaps associated with the fact that they are
not fulfilling the traditional gendered roles within
marriage,” the report continues.
The analysis found
couples with the opposite pattern of educational attainment,
where men had the tertiary qualifications and women did not
complete high school, did not demonstrate an increased risk
of subsequent marital instability and, if anything, showed
greater than average stability. The lowest rate of
separation was found among couples where both partners
reported tertiary qualifications.
The study also found
there was no association between alcohol consumption and
relationship instability. But couples in which women were
smokers, regardless of whether the male partner smoked, were
at increased risk of divorce or separation. “We consider
that this reflects the effectiveness of women’s smoking as
a marker of social and economic disadvantage and
adversity,” the report says.
From Patricia Karvelas in
the Australian
Academic liberalism not contagious
An
article of faith among conservative critics of US
universities has been that liberal professors politically
indoctrinate their students. This conviction has led state
lawmakers to consider requiring colleges to submit reports
to the government detailing their progress in ensuring
“intellectual diversity”, prompting universities to
establish faculty positions devoted to conservatism, and
spurring the creation of a network of volunteer watchdogs to
monitor “political correctness” on campuses.
Just a
few weeks ago, Michael Barone, a fellow at the conservative
American Enterprise Institute, warned in the Washington
Times against “the liberal thugocracy,” arguing that
today’s liberals seem to be taking “marching orders”
from “college and university campuses.” A handful of new
studies, however, have found such worries to be overwrought.
A variety of researchers have recently concluded that
academics have virtually no impact on the political views
and ideology of their students.
If there has been a
conspiracy among liberal faculty members to influence
students, “they’ve done a pretty bad job”, said A Lee
Fritschler, a professor of public policy at George Mason
University and author of Closed Minds? Politics and Ideology
in American Universities. The notion that students are
induced to move leftward “is a fantasy”, said Jeremy D
Mayer, another of the book’s authors. “Parents and
family are the most important influence”, followed by the
news media and peers, he said. “Professors are among the
least influential.”
A study of nearly 7,000 students at
38 institutions published in the current PS: Political
Science and Politics, the journal of the American Political
Science Association, as well as a second study that has been
accepted by the journal to run in April 2009, both reach
similar conclusions. “There is no evidence that an
instructor’s views instigate political change among
students,” Matthew Woessner and April Kelly-Woessner write
in that second study.
From Patricia Cohen in the New York
Times
Nietzsche ist tot
At Temple College, a community
college in Texas, Friedrich Nietzsche’s celebrated words
from Die fröhliche Wissenschaft, “Gott ist tot” (God is
dead), have been barred from a lecturer’s office door.
While the college says that to leave the phrase up would
offend others and constitute and endorsement of the phrase,
the professor and others see a double standard in place, and
a violation of academic freedom.
Kerry Laird, a
literature and composition lecturer who does not have
tenure, is in his first year at Temple. He said that, as a
student and instructor, he always enjoyed the way academics
use their office doors to reveal bits of their personality
and to challenge students with cartoons, artwork, and
various phrases.
After receiving a complaint about a
cartoon with a caption containing an indecency on his door,
he turned to Nietzsche and, striving to challenge while
being more subtle, he used only the German version of the
quote, not the English translation. “I didn’t want to be
too blunt,” he said. But he was quickly told that Mark A
Smith, interim vice-president of educational services, had
ordered the saying removed. And Dr Laird said he had no
choice in the matter.
Professor Smith outlined his views
in an e-mail message he sent to a student who complained
about the quote’s removal. “Temple College as a public
institution cannot be represented as showing preference
toward any religious philosophy/perspective or toward the
opposite, being atheism. The same practice goes for
politics. The decision to have the quote removed was that
the quote can be considered very controversial and offensive
to others. In fact, other people have already expressed that
the wording is offensive!” he wrote.
From Scott Jaschik
in Inside Higher Ed
More international news
More
international news can be found on University World
News:
http://www.universityworldnews.com
AUS Tertiary
Update is published weekly on Thursdays and distributed
freely to members of the Association of University Staff and
others. Back issues are available on the AUS website:
www.aus.ac.nz. Direct inquiries should be made to the
editor, email:
editor@aus.ac.nz