Otago Polytechnic Students’ Assoc.
Thursday, 24 May 2007
Attn: Local Body & Education Reporters
Students Bag Rate-Payer Funded Stadium
Today OPSA presented its survey of Otago Polytechnic student opinion on the proposed new stadium at DCC and ORC draft
annual plan hearings. In the face of a postal survey that avoided student opinion, and recent attempts by ‘Our Stadium’
to misrepresent student opinion (ODT, 26 April), OPSA conducted its own informed survey of student opinion.
The key finding is that 63% of respondents do not support a new stadium, compared to 37% who do support a new stadium.
This support drops to 24% if it involves increases to rates, or flow-on increases in rents (full results below). This is
consistent with the DCC’s original residents’ survey with 66% against, and 22% for a new stadium.
OPSA’s survey differs significantly from the Carisbrook Stadium Trust’s survey reported in today’s ODT , in that it was
an informed and more meaningful survey; OPSA’s survey did not avoid the hard questions - respondents were also asked
about support for the stadium if they had to pay for it through their rates.
“We’re not surprised that a survey which simply asks ‘do you want a new stadium?’ elicits a positive response. However,
a meaningful survey that asks ‘do you want a new stadium if will cost you?’ is a different question, with a different
answer” said OPSA president, Richard Mitchell.
OPSA’s survey also elicited many comments from OP students that the proposed stadium was unaffordable to the city and
its rate-payers, that Dunedin was too small for such a stadium to be financially viable, and that upgrading the current
stadium would be preferable.
OP Student opinion on a New Stadium
Lack of Support
63% of respondents do not support a new stadium compared to 37% who do support a new stadium. However, this support
drops to 24% if it involves increases to rates, or flow-on increases in rents. This is reasonably close to the original
residents’ survey with 66% against, and 22% for a new stadium.
Qualified support
It should also be noted that many of the supporters commented that they only supported a new stadium if it could secure
top level international rugby games, or if was truly multi-purpose.
Need
Only 16% of all respondents believe a stadium is needed. Even stadium supporters are not convinced it is needed; 32% of
stadium supporters do not believe Dunedin actually needs a new stadium.
Who should pay?
The majority of respondents did not believe a new stadium should be funded by rates or rent increases; 58% opted for a
$0 increase in rates or rent to pay for a new stadium. Only 25% would pay extra rates or rent to fund a new stadium
(largely, but not exclusively supporters).
Irrespective of supporting the stadium or not, almost 100% of respondents believed the majority of the stadium should be
funded privately (eg private funding, sponsorship, user-pays, etc), instead of from rates or Council money.
How much?
58% of respondents believe the DCC/ORC should not subsidise the project at all. Only 25% believed it should be
subsidised by local authorities. The overall average subsidy respondents believe should be made by local authorities is
13%.
The overall average rates increase respondents would pay was $42 per annum.
City debt
Irrespective of supporting the stadium or not - almost 100% of respondents believed the DCC should be planning to
decrease its total debt instead of increasing it.
Spending Priorities
55% of respondents believed improved public transport and parking should be number one spending priority for local
authorities. Of the stadium supporters 32% believe a new stadium should be the top spending priority, 28% of supporters
believe public transport and parking should be the top spending priority.
ENDS