AUS Tertiary Update
Polytechnics face record losses
Polytechnics and wananga
are reported to be facing their worst-ever year financially,
with suggestions that nine of the country’s twenty-three
institutions will record deficits ranging between $0.5
million and $13 million for 2006. Worst affected is Te
Wananga o Aotearoa, which predicted last year that it would
lose as much as $13 million in the first half of this year,
largely as a result of a major restructuring and significant
cuts to its student numbers.
It has been estimated by
Education Review that the nine institutions affected will
collectively lose as much as $35 million this year, while
many of those institutions forecasting surpluses are
expecting their lowest in years. The Tairawhiti Polytechnic
is facing its third consecutive deficit of $3 million or
more.
The Chair of the Institutes of Technology and
Polytechnics of New Zealand, Dr Neil Barns, told National
Radio’s Morning Report on Tuesday that the losses resulted
from a combination of lower enrolments, the Government’s
reduction in funding for courses it considers of low
relevance and an overall reduction in revenue. He said that
a number of the institutions had previously used income from
the types of courses from which the Government has cut
funding to cross-subsidise others such as trades training or
those in regional areas where enrolments are small.
Dr
Barns said that the polytechnics are talking to the
Government and Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) to find
ways of alleviating the situation until new funding
arrangements are implemented.
The National Secretary of
the Association of Staff in Tertiary Education, Sharn Riggs,
said that the report came as no surprise to her
organisation. “We have watched a pattern of financial
difficulties across the sector for a number of years now,
and all our submissions to the TEC and to the Minister for
Tertiary Education have reiterated the fact that the
institute of technology and polytechnic sector is
underfunded,” she said. “This is exactly why some
institutions have resorted in the past to using avenues of
funding such as high-volume community and international
students. Now that those funding sources have dried up, the
stark reality of the financial state of the country’s
polytechnics is there for all to see.”
Ms Riggs warned
that, while the TEC reforms signal some positive approaches
to dealing with these problems, they may come too late for
those institutions with little or no infrastructure left
from which to rebuild.
Also in Tertiary Update this
week
1. Canterbury management hostile to staff, says
report
2. Students to challenge Code of Conduct
3. AUT
academic audit released
4. OECD report shows NZ tuition
fees high
5. Skill shortages open doors for women in
trades
6. Marsden Fund awards for 2006
7. What makes
students travel?
8. Over-fifties keen to quit
academia
9. After-effects of 9/11 still show
10. Spin
doctor?
Canterbury management hostile to staff, says
report
A hard-hitting report, released this week by the
Canterbury Branch of the Association of University Staff
(AUS), describes an institution with serious problems,
attributed “overwhelmingly” to senior management and an
employer who has, at best, an indifferent and, at worst, a
hostile attitude to staff.
The report, based on a survey
of more than 500 staff, also says that low morale and high
levels of stress at the University are worse than
international norms and may result in a “thoroughly”
unhealthy and unsafe work environment
A significant
majority of the academic staff (67 percent) and around 40
percent of the general staff who participated in the survey
said that the University’s Vice-Chancellor, Professor Roy
Sharp, was not a good leader. Only 12 percent of academic
staff agreed he is a good leader. Three-quarters felt they
did not know the long-term vision of senior management, and
only 5 percent of academics believed that senior management
consults with them sufficiently.
Of the respondents, 67
percent of academic staff and about 40 percent of general
staff report “burn-out” due to job-related stress,
compared to an average figure of 26 percent in the United
States. Higher levels of stress than two years ago were
reported by 61 percent of academic staff and 31 percent of
general staff. Morale has also eroded, with 57 percent of
academic staff and 27 percent of general staff reporting a
deterioration over the last few years.
In an email to
staff, Professor Sharp questioned the report’s
methodology, saying that it was inevitable that major
University restructuring had affected staff, some of whom
were more comfortable with it than others. While it was
“indeed regrettable” that some staff were not happy in
their work, “it is inconceivable that a University
besieged by low morale could achieve what this university
has ... in the last few years,” the email read.
AUS
Canterbury Branch President, Dr David Small, said the
achievements of staff are “a tribute to their
professionalism and dedication, and their sense of hope that
their collegial spirit is strong enough to survive the
current autocratic management”. He said that the report
was a serious indictment of the managerial team, and it was
regrettable that Professor Sharp had no interest in
investigating and addressing the matters it raised.
A
summary analysis can be found
at:
http://www.aus.ac.nz/branches/canty/MoraleReport.pdf
The
report can be found
at:
http://www.aus.ac.nz/branches/canty/UCMorale.pdf
Students
to challenge Code of Conduct
The Otago University
Students’ Association says it will challenge a Code of
Conduct adopted by the University Council on Tuesday this
week. Student President Paul Chong, has been widely reported
as saying that OUSA had not been consulted properly and
would “see the University in court”.
The University
of Otago Vice-Chancellor, Professor David Skegg, has
rejected the claim, saying that there was wide consultation
on the proposed code over an eighteen-month period, with
student representatives fully involved, including Mr Chong
himself, on a working party dealing with the matter.
On
Wednesday, Public Law specialist, Mai Chen, told Morning
Report that she had been examining the issue for OUSA and
believed that, while the University had the right to have a
code, it should be limited to on-campus behaviour. “Just
because you become a student at Otago University, you
don’t relinquish your rights as a human being which all
New Zealanders have under the New Zealand Bill of Rights
Act, the freedom of movement, freedom of association, the
freedom to express oneself and the freedom from double
jeopardy,” she said.
Professor Skegg said that the
University’s legal advisers and those for OUSA agreed that
the University’s authority was not defined by the
boundaries of the campus but by the need for there to be
(existence of?) a nexus between the behaviour of concern and
the University as an institution. “The University has
always been clear that it does not seek to control behaviour
unconnected with the University. The suggestion that the
Code goes beyond what is appropriate is rejected, as is any
claim that the Code is unlawful or invalid,” he said.
The Code is intended to promote the University's
academic aims and sense of community through the cultivation
of mutual respect, tolerance and understanding, and outlaws
actions such as vandalism, setting fires without regard for
personal safety or the security of property and throwing
bottles.
AUT academic audit released
The Academic Audit
Unit has released the report from its recent academic audit
of the Auckland University of Technology (AUT). It concludes
that the University focuses on students and their
preparation for employment within an educational culture of
applied research and curriculum development, design and
delivery that maintains active linkages with the
professions, business and industry.
The Audit Unit
commended AUT in a number of areas, including the assurance
and enhancement of quality of it academic programmes and the
extent and effectiveness of stakeholder involvement in the
design and development of curricula. It also commended AUT
for the effectiveness of its “staircasing” of students
from pre-degree to degree programmes and for relevance of,
and staff satisfaction with, staff-development programmes.
With respect to teaching quality, the report noted that
the University is aware of the need to monitor the workloads
of academic staff undertaking extra responsibilities.
The
New Zealand Universities Academic Audit Unit was established
in 1993 to monitor and advise on academic quality and
standards. The process of audit requires an initial
self-review; the Audit Panel then conducts interviews in an
audit visit to the university. The report commends good
practice and makes recommendations intended to assist the
university in its own programmes of continuous improvement.
Academic audits, in which all New Zealand universities
participate, focus on teaching quality, programme delivery
and the achievement of learning outcomes.
AUT
Vice-Chancellor Derek McCormack says that the University is
pleased with the report. “We welcome the helpful
recommendations which reinforce the programme of change and
development already under way, as we make sure that the
student experience at AUT remains distinctive and of high
quality,” he said.
The AUT audit can be found
at:
http://www.aau.ac.nz/nzuaau_site/publications/reports/AUT_cyc3_2006.pdf
OECD
report shows NZ tuition fees high
A report released on
Tuesday by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and
Development highlights New Zealand’s “incredibly high”
student-tuition fees, according to the New Zealand Union of
Students’ Associations (NZUSA).
“The 454 page report,
Education at a Glance, shows that New Zealand’s fees are
high by international standards and levels of government
funding for tertiary education are comparably low,” said
NZUSA Co-President, Conor Roberts. “When the OECD compared
us with other countries, it highlighted our high fees and
comparably low levels of government funding of tertiary
education.”
The report can be found at:
http://caliban.sourceoecd.org/upload/9606061e.pdf
Skill
shortages open doors for women in trades
Skills
shortages are prompting employers to buck the trend and
employ female apprentices, according to a major new report
on Modern Apprenticeships released on Monday by the Human
Rights Commission.
Equal Employment Opportunities
Commissioner, Dr Judy McGregor, said that pragmatism was
driving the change, adding that, when faced with a skills
shortage, some employers are thinking outside the box and
bringing young women into trades training.
Latest
figures show that one in twelve Modern Apprentices are
women, and a growing number of them are training to become
builders, joiners, carpenters, electricians and motor
mechanics. Dr McGregor said that there is a long way to go,
however, with female apprentices increasing from 6.6 percent
in 2003 to just 8.5 percent currently.
A number of female
Modern Apprentices from throughout New Zealand are profiled
in the Human Rights Commission report, Give Girls a Go!
Female Modern Apprentices in New Zealand, launched in
Parliament this week by the Minister of Women’s Affairs,
Lianne Dalziel. Their stories and reports from their
employers aim to raise awareness among young women,
educators, careers advisors, industry training groups and
employers about the benefits of trades training.
Dr
McGregor said that the positive reaction from some employers
of female Modern Apprentices challenges stereotypes. “In
the past, bosses appeared to be stuck in the groove of
“boys only”. Now many are open to the best person for
the job whether they are female, male, Māori, Pacific or
from a minority group,” she said.
Marsden Fund awards
for 2006
The Marsden Fund, New Zealand’s funding for
ideas-driven research, has this year given the go-ahead to
seventy-eight new projects, with $39.1 million in awards.
The projects, twenty-six of which are Fast-Start grants for
outstanding new researchers, cover an enormous breadth of
disciplines, from nanotechnology to the arts in Oceania.
Chair of the Marsden Fund Council, Dr Garth Carnaby,
said that some truly world-class research would simply not
happen without the Marsden Fund. Examples of what the new
funding will enable include allowing New Zealand researchers
to participate in a new global initiative to detect
neutrinos using the Antarctic ice cap as the detector,
investigating the social networks of homeless people and
analysing youth perspectives on videogame violence. There is
also a project that may help parole board members decide
when violent prisoners should be allowed to go home.
Of
the 932 preliminary proposals (722 Standard proposals and
210 Fast-Start proposals), only seventy-eight were
ultimately funded.
What makes students travel?
A new
report, What makes a student travel for tertiary education
study, provides an insight into the movements of tertiary
students throughout New Zealand and helps to answer
questions about the relationship between the location of
tertiary provision and the decision-making of tertiary
students. It measures the impact of factors such as
geographic access to tertiary provision, ethnic group,
highest school qualification and tertiary campus on the
decisions of how far students will travel for tertiary
study.
The report is restricted to full-time students who
were under twenty years of age and left secondary school to
attend a public tertiary-education-institution campus. The
rationale for these restrictions is that these students are
likely to travel for educational purposes, whereas older or
part-time students are likely to have more varied reasons
for travelling, such as family and work.
Some findings
from the report are that geographic access to tertiary
provision is the most significant factor in determining how
far a student travelled to attend a tertiary campus.
Students who were comparatively more isolated from tertiary
provision had a higher probability of travelling further
than their nearest campus for tertiary study.
While
field of study influenced how far students chose to travel
for tertiary study, it was a field of study at a particular
campus that was most important in this decision.
The
influence of the tertiary campus was found to be an
important factor in the decision of how far a student will
travel for tertiary study. Certain campuses have a higher
probability of attracting students from far away.
Māori
students were more likely to travel long distances for
tertiary study, while Pasifika students were more likely to
attend a tertiary campus near their home-base than other
students.
Women were more likely to travel long
distances for tertiary study than men.
The report can be
found
at:
http://educationcounts.edcentre.govt.nz/publications/tertiary/student-travel-tertiary.html
Worldwatch
Over-fifties
keen to quit academia
Age discrimination is said to be
rife across Britain’s universities, with staff aged over
fifty the unhappiest in their jobs, according to a poll
released this week by the University and College Union
(UCU).
Among the key findings of the survey is that 43
percent of staff aged over fifty would retire immediately if
they could. This is in stark contrast to younger members of
staff, of whom just 18 percent aged under 35 would retire
now. Overall, 33 percent said they would retire now if they
could.
Staff aged over fifty have the lowest morale, with
39 percent of them describing their morale as poor or very
poor. In the fifty-one to fifty-five age bracket, 41 percent
of staff describe morale as poor or very poor, and in the
fifty-five to sixty-four age bracket, 37 per cent describe
morale as poor or very poor. Overall 35 per cent of staff
describe morale as poor or very poor.
UCU Joint General
Secretary, Sally Hunt, said that the report showed that
there was a group of incredibly devoted and hardworking
lecturers in their fifties, many of whom are clearly very
unhappy. “In a sector where age and wisdom have
traditionally been synonymous, I cannot understand why
universities are failing to treat their staff with respect
they deserve,” she said. “All too often it is this group
that is the first to be considered for voluntary redundancy
and little is done to consider their needs and how best to
use their wealth of experience and
knowledge.”
After-effects of 9/11 still show
American
universities are still feeling the after-effects of the 11
September 2001 terrorist attacks, particularly in areas like
visa rules, international faculty exchanges, curriculum
offerings and campus risk-management and security planning,
according to a report released this week by the National
Association of Independent Colleges and Universities
(NAICU).
The report, September 11: Effects on My Campus
Five Years Later, was based on a survey of 133 presidents
and senior-level administrators at colleges in thirty-one
states and the District of Columbia. While the findings are
not statistically significant, the responses provide insight
into the continuing effects of the terrorist attacks on
higher education.
NAICU President, David L. Warren, said
that what stands out most in the survey is the impact 11
September has had on international-student enrolment and
faculty exchange. Two-thirds of survey respondents agreed
that the Student and Exchange Visitor Information System,
established in 2003 and run by the US Department of Homeland
Security to track and monitor foreign students and scholars,
has at least moderately affected campus policies and
international exchanges.
More than half of the
respondents agreed that the attacks had had at least
moderate effects on curriculum. Respondents noted greater
student interest in foreign policy and international
relations and an increased interest in, and availability of,
courses on Islam. New undergraduate majors and graduate
programmes have also been developed, including certificate
programmes in homeland security.
Some respondents also
cited an impact on liberal-arts core requirements, while
more than three-quarters of respondents reported moderate
effects at minimum on campus risk-management and security
procedures, such as the development of additional staff
positions, the installation of panic buttons in classrooms
and new emergency-response programmes.
From the
Chronicle of Higher Education
Spin doctor?
In what
Tertiary Update believes must surely rank as one of the more
questionable decisions of the season, Australian cricket
legend Shane Warne donned academic regalia yesterday to
receive an honorary doctorate from the Southhampton Solent
University in England.
Professor Glyn Tonge,
Pro-Chancellor and Chairman of the University’s Board of
Governors, said that, as arguably the greatest bowler who
has ever lived, Shane Warne is highly deserving of this
honorary doctorate. “His sporting success is an
inspiration to all,” he said.
In what was described as
a break with tradition, the degree was conferred at the Rose
Bowl, the home of Hampshire cricket where Warne is currently
playing.
From BBC Sports
News
*******************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz. Direct enquires should be
made to Marty Braithwaite, AUS Communications Officer,
email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz