AUS Tertiary Update
Auckland rift deepens, parties sent to mediation
The
Association of University Staff (AUS) and the University of
Auckland will head to mediation next week while the
Employment Authority considers whether a deepening dispute
over bargaining should be referred to the Employment Court
for a decision. The AUS commenced legal action last week
after Auckland’s Vice-Chancellor Stuart McCutcheon failed to
show up at a preliminary national employment agreement
negotiation meeting in Wellington, and then added fuel to
the fire by offering non-union staff a 4.5 percent salary
increase. McCutcheon advised the Union that the University
would not enter multi-employer university bargaining but
would, instead, only bargain at a local enterprise
level.
Tension between the parties escalated further when
the University implied that it would cut off access to the
University’s email system after the AUS wrote to non-union
staff encouraging them to join the union. The University’s
Human Resources Manager, Kath Clarke, wrote to AUS saying
that the emailed letter was in breach of its duty of good
faith towards the University. “We also note that providing
access to the University’s email system is a privilege that
has been extended to AUS to allow you to communicate with
your members,” wrote Ms Clarke. “We are thereby writing to
seek your undertaking that the AUS will ensure that any
further communications issued by it comply with its duty of
good faith. If the AUS continues to act in breach of its
duty of good faith, we confirm that this will be treated
very seriously by the University.”
AUS General Secretary
Helen Kelly said the University’s letter clearly implied
that email access would be stopped if the union again wrote
to non-union staff. She said it was extraordinary that it
would attempt to restrict freedom of speech and association,
particularly given the statutory responsibility universities
have towards academic freedom. “We have a lawful right to
encourage non-union staff to join the Union, and the use of
email or of visiting them at their workplace is perfectly
legitimate,” she said. “AUS will not be intimidated by
threats from the University of Auckland, and we will
continue to communicate with union and non-union staff in
any manner we believe appropriate.”
AUS National
President Professor Nigel Haworth said it was particularly
concerning that the University of Auckland was attempting to
disengage from the national bargaining process. “It has long
been accepted that under-funding of universities and
consequent inadequate salaries are national issues which
require national solutions,” he said. “We are urging Stuart
McCutcheon to participate in the national bargaining and
work towards building a cohesive national solution. As Chair
of the New Zealand Vice-Chancellors’ Committee, he has a
major opportunity to show leadership in the university
sector. Turning his back on that, by disrupting the current
bargaining process, threatens the interests of all parties.”
Also in Tertiary Update this week
1. TEC appoints
first Chief Executive
2. Changing face of graduate
population
3. Establishment of Universities Bill to
proceed, but without controversial
provision?
4. Auditor-General defines scope of Wananga
inquiry
5. LMU academic boycott resumes
6. Harvard
boss stays put despite no-confidence vote
7. Mob rule
defied by Rector
TEC appoints first Chief Executive
The
Tertiary Education Commission has appointed Janice Shiner as
its first Chief Executive. She is currently Director General
of the Lifelong Learning Directorate in England, and will
take up the new appointment on 11 July.
Announcing the
appointment, the Acting Chair of TEC, Dr Kaye Turner, said
that Janice Shiner has the mix of high-level strategic and
management experience the Commission was looking for, having
headed one of England’s largest tertiary colleges and
working at the highest level on policy advice and funding
implementation. “She has a rare combination of top-level
strategic leadership in both tertiary institutions and
government agencies,” she said.
The role of Chief
Executive is a new one, with the TEC having previously been
led by two full-time Commissioners and a General Manager.
“Under our new governance arrangements, the Chief Executive
not only leads the organisation internally, but also takes
the lead in relationships with the tertiary sector and
public,” said Kaye Turner. “We have every confidence that
New Zealand will benefit from Janice Shiner’s insights into
how to develop and implement funding models for tertiary
education and to monitor their impact.”
New TEC Chair
Russell Marshall will take up his position from 4
April.
Changing face of graduate population
The make-up
of New Zealand’s university graduate population is changing,
with more international graduates and greater ethnic
diversity, according to the latest University Graduate
Destinations publication, released this week by the New
Zealand Vice-Chancellors’ Committee.
The report is based
on a questionnaire response from 10,884 people who were
eligible to graduate from one of the country’s eight
universities in 2003. It showed that, approximately six
months after graduation, 62.4 percent of New Zealand
respondents were in full-time employment, with 19.6 percent
undertaking further full-time study. A total of 586 New
Zealand respondents were recorded as being overseas.
The
ethnic make-up of the graduate population is changing, with
60.8 percent identifying as European/Pakeha, down from 64.6
percent in 2002, and the proportion of graduates identifying
as Asian rising to 19.4 percent, up 2.4 percent from 2002.
The proportion of other ethnicities remains relatively
stable, with New Zealand Maori at 5.6 percent, Pacific at
2.4 percent and Indian at 2.1 percent.
Of the 708
international respondents, 347 were working full-time with
more than half of them (59.1 percent) still in New Zealand,
18.1 percent were employed part-time and 29.8 percent stated
they were not working.
New Zealand respondents in
full-time employment who supplied details had average
salaries of $50,388 for males and $42,112 for females, up
$1,172 and $472 respectively from the previous
survey.
The New Zealand University Students’ Association
(NZUSA) says the survey shows that women face an unfair
return from tertiary education. “This report proves that
female graduates are not reaping the same financial benefits
as their male counterparts with the same qualifications,”
said Karen Price, NZUSA’s National Women’s Rights Officer.
“This is despite female students graduating in greater
numbers than males at all levels of tertiary
study.”
Establishment of Universities Bill to proceed, but
without controversial provision?
Parliament’s Education
and Science Select Committee recommended this week that the
Education (Establishment of Universities) Amendment Bill be
passed, but without the controversial provision which would
have meant that its new provisions would be applied to a
current application by Unitec for university status.
The
Bill contains what the Government describes as better
provisions for determining whether an organisation can be
established as a university and, if passed, will give the
Minister the sole authority to make a decision on whether
any application for university status will be considered by
the New Zealand Qualifications Authority (NZQA).
The Bill
initially required that any current applications would be
subject to the new provisions, something which infuriated
Unitec as it considered the retrospective nature of the
legislation was solely intended to stop its long-standing
application for university status being considered.
In
turn, Unitec announced that it intended to sue the Minister
of Education and NZQA for more than $3.5 million
compensation for losses incurred as a result of what it
described as multiple breaches of its constitutional right
to be considered for university status.
Unitec’s Chief
Executive Officer, Dr John Webster, said he was pleased but
not surprised by the recommendation of the Select Committee.
“All we have ever asked for is the opportunity to have our
application assessed fairly and on its merits against the
statutory standards, and the removal of the retrospective
clause from the Bill makes that outcome at least
possible.”
Unitec’s case against the Minister and NZQA is
set down to be heard in the High Court on 2-3
June.
Auditor-General defines scope of Wananga
inquiry
The terms of reference for the Auditor-General’s
inquiry into Te Wananga o Aotearoa have been released as a
result of widespread public interest following recent
allegations of nepotism and financial mismanagement at the
Te Awamutu-based institution.
The inquiry will examine
selected practices at the Wananga involving councillors,
employees and/or their families; the international travel
policies and practices, with a particular focus on selected
transactions; selected payments made to councillors and/or
employees in relation to their involvement with entities
controlled by the Wananga; the identification and management
of conflicts of interest in relation to the Mahi Ora, Kiwi
Ora and Greenlight programmes; the relationship and
transactions between the Wananga and the Aotearoa Institute
Te Kuratini o Nga Waka Trust; the implementation of the
Wananga’s capital acquisition strategy in relation to
selected recent capital purchases; the processes used by the
Wananga when it employed close relatives of the Chief
Executive/Tumuaki; and any other issues which relate to or
arise out of those matters.
The Auditor-General will not
examine the appropriateness of the type and funding levels
of courses offered by the Wananga; concerns about the
quality of certain courses; and enrolment practices,
including the use of inducements.
The Auditor-General
will report the findings of his inquiry to Parliament when
complete.
Worldwatch
LMU academic boycott
resumes
Lecturers at London Metropolitan University have
voted unanimously to reinstate an academic boycott, and
their union, NATFHE, will soon ballot members on industrial
action, including strike action. This follows the breakdown
of negotiations between University management and the Union
over the imposition of a new employment agreement for some
staff.
Last year, the University threatened to sack 387
academic staff if they refused to accept the new, inferior
employment agreements following the merger of the University
of North London and London Guildhall University to create
LMU. The resultant industrial tension, including the
imposition of an academic boycott, eased earlier this year
when the University agreed to enter talks with NATFHE, and
not to sack any staff while discussions took
place.
NATFHE spokesperson Roger Kline said that the
University has subsequently rejected the Union’s efforts to
engage in negotiations on the employment agreement. “The
University management made a mockery of our efforts to find
a conciliated solution. They seem set on conflict,” he said.
“Publicly-funded assets like universities should not be
managed in this provocative and self damaging way.”
Mr
Kline said that, in order to aid a swift resolution to the
dispute, NATFHE is asking academic staff in the United
Kingdom and internationally to support an effective and
comprehensive academic boycott of the University.
Further details on the dispute can be located at
www.natfhe.org.uk/says/lonmetun.html
Harvard boss stays
put despite no-confidence vote
Harvard University
President Lawrence Summers says he will not step down,
despite a no-confidence vote in him following recent remarks
questioning women’s aptitude for science. The 210 to 185
vote is unprecedented in Harvard’s history, and comes after
nearly two months of frustration within the Faculty of Arts
and Sciences over Dr Summers’s leadership. Professors have
criticised him for his aggressive and alienating style of
leadership. The vote represents the views of only one of
Harvard’s ten faculties and is not binding.
Dr Summers
said after the meeting that he planned to continue in his
post and work with the Faculty to move forward strongly and
in a united way.
Harvard’s seven-member governing
corporation has stood by Dr Summers since tensions
escalated, saying that, while they take the views of faculty
seriously, they have confidence in him to move forward to
advance the University’s vital academic aims.
The
Chronicle of Higher Education and The Australian
Mob rule
defied by Rector
The Rector of the University of Palermo
in Sicily has announced plans to abolish tuition fees for
students whose families have to pay protection to the Costa
Nostra in a move which is seen as a public challenge to
omerta, the Mafia’s law of silence.
Guiseppe Silvestra
made his announcement at a conference of judges discussing
Mafia extortion. “Family members of victims of extortion
rackets must be exempted from paying fees,” he said.
His
proposal has been approved in principle by the University’s
governing board, but it is not yet clear how it will be
implemented. A University representative said the Rector
believed “that the University is not an academic
abstraction, a place isolated from the city and its
problems.”
The proposal could encourage extortion
victims, usually those who run small businesses, to tell the
authorities. It also issues a challenge to the Mafia’s
omerta, the breaking of which is usually punished by
death.
Times
Higher
*******************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz