AUS Tertiary Update
Tertiary sector set for shake-up?
The
Minister of Education has signalled major changes across the
entire tertiary education sector in the wake of Christchurch
Polytechnic’s Cool It debacle last year, and continuing
turmoil over various allegations against Te Wananga o
Aotearoa. Responding to questions at a packed press
conference on Monday, Trevor Mallard hinted strongly at
changes to both funding mechanisms and governance
structures.
Trevor Mallard told reporters that there had
been a major shift in funding in the past seven to eight
years from degree to non-degree programmes, many of which he
described as “useless”. He said the growth in non-degree
programmes, which are funded at approximately the same level
as degree courses, had not been planned, and he was not
convinced taxpayers were getting good value for money. He
described courses in which students were simply given a DVD
or video to learn from as a much different proposition from
the classroom teaching government had envisaged when it set
funding rates. “Technology has meant that we have had an
enormous amount of change in the cost of provision for
courses. In some cases this has been exploited by
institutions….The taxpayer just cannot stand paying $5,000
for something that’s worth $200 or $100,” he said.
In
what appeared to be frustration at his limited power to
intervene more directly at Te Wananga o Aotearoa, Trevor
Mallard told reporters that governance structures suitable
for a university may no longer be appropriate for other
types of tertiary education providers. He pointed out that
the whole sector was governed under rules necessitated by
the statutory protections of institutional autonomy and
academic freedom given to universities, but a polytechnic on
the West Coast, he mused, did not have those same
characteristics and need not necessarily be governed in the
same way.
Also in Tertiary Update this week . . .
1. Review should mean less waste in tertiary education
courses
2. Wananga hands over control, whistleblowers
invited
3. Massey tops spending on
marketing
4. College and university talk
merger
5. PBRF panel member nominations close
Friday
6. VCs’ salaries at “outrageous
levels”
7. Ukraine orders universities to reinstate
students
8. Australian university market to be
deregulated
Review should mean less waste in tertiary
education courses
Reinforcing the Minister’s comments
about tertiary institutions was the announcement by the
Tertiary Education Commission (TEC) that it is to review the
strategic relevance, quality and value-for-money of a number
of courses run by private tertiary education providers, and
to examine overlapping provision in the sector, including
the duplication of trades-focused training, between industry
training organisations and institutes of technology and
polytechnics. Included amongst the courses to be reviewed
for their usefulness are diving, hairdressing and a number
associated with the beauty and cosmetics industry.
The
review has been welcomed by university staff, who say it
should lead to less money being wasted on tertiary courses
which are of low quality and value, and which should never
have received public funding in the first place. Association
of University Staff (AUS) National President Professor Nigel
Haworth said that it should result in additional funding
being available for universities, which are providing
high-quality courses and which are accountable and
transparent in their operations. He said that university
staff are tired of working in an under-funded environment
when they know money is being pumped into unsatisfactory
courses in other parts of the sector, sometimes in direct
competition to quality courses in universities.
“Universities are particularly accountable for both their
funding and the quality of their courses. They have
representative councils, active student bodies, active
alumni and unions. They are accountable under numerous
statutes and are audited by an academic audit unit. No other
tertiary institutions are so closely scrutinised,” he
said.
“We currently have a number of non-university
institutions being funded to teach degrees which produce
research results insufficient even to register in the
Performance-Based Research Fund Quality Evaluation exercise.
By funding degree courses in universities, government gets
the double benefit of teaching and research,” said Professor
Haworth. “We hope that this review will remove the inequity
and enable funding to be redirected to universities, where
it is both deserved and needed.”
Wananga hands over
control, whistleblowers invited
Te Wananga o Aotearoa
(TWOA) agreed yesterday to hand over its financial control
to a Crown Manager following another week in which
allegations and counter-allegations continued to swirl
around the embattled institution. It brought to an end
something of a stand-off between the Minister of Education
and the Wananga after its Chief Executive, Rongo Wetere, had
rejected the Minister’s attempt to control its finances
while an Auditor-General’s investigation takes place.
Earlier, Mr Wetere told National Radio that the Government
was trying to force the Wananga into insolvency and later,
at the Hui Taumata Maori economic development summit, said
that Trevor Mallard had “lost the plot” and was “trying to
bring the Wananga down”.
The tension escalated after
Trevor Mallard announced a package of actions and
interventions in response to concerns and allegations about
TWOA. They included the immediate appointment of a Crown
Observer, Brian Roche, to the Council, broadening the terms
of an Auditor-General’s inquiry into a range of allegations
made against TWOA, changing the Wananga’s borrowing
conditions by requiring it to delegate financial powers to
the Crown Observer, who would then become a Crown Manager,
and withholding a $20 million suspensory loan.
One of the
more unusual features of Trevor Mallard’s package was the
appointment of an “in-confidence” point of contact for
whistleblowers who have matters they consider should be
investigated under the Protected Disclosures Act. The move
appears to be an attempt to stem the flow of information to
opposition political parties which have continued to make
further accusations of impropriety against TWOA. In the
latest, ACT MP Ken Shirley alleged that TWOA awarded a
non-tendered $12 million contract to an air conditioning and
refrigeration company owned by Mr Wetere’s son, also a
salaried executive of TWOA.
Prime Minister Helen Clark
also joined in the fray, asking to table documents in
Parliament showing that Mr Wetere was a front-runner for
office in the National Party.
Massey tops spending on
marketing
Massey University topped spending by public
tertiary institutions on marketing in 2004, according to the
latest estimates provided to the New Zealand University
Students’ Association (NZUSA) by AC Neilson. Massey’s bill
was $3.16 million, up by more than 47 percent on its 2003
figure of $2.15 million and more than $1 million ahead of
the nearest other university, Auckland, which spent an
estimated $2 million.
Public tertiary institutions
collectively forked out a record amount of more than $26.5
million on their marketing for the year, $3 million more
than in 2003, and $13 million more than in 1999.
Among
the other big spenders was the Auckland University of
Technology at $1.6 million, up by 56 percent from 2003,
Christchurch Polytechnic at $1.45 million, Manukau Institute
of Technology at $2.5 million, University of Otago at $1.65
million, Open Polytechnic of New Zealand at $3.1 million,
and Waikato University at $1.1 million. The Wananga o
Aotearoa spent $666,000, up a massive 97 percent from its
$338,000 in 2003.
NZUSA Co-President Camilla Belich said
it was sickening that students had paid out millions more in
tuition fees just so the public tertiary institutions could
go out and spend “a whopping” $26 million in marketing
simply to compete with each other.
“These figures prove
that last year’s $19 million increase in fees was completely
unjustified. Students would be outraged to know that the
real reason they are paying hundreds of dollars in increased
fees is for yet more fruitless marketing campaigns,” said
Andrew Kirton, the other NZUSA Co-President.
College and
university talk merger
The University of Canterbury and
the Christchurch College of Education have announced they
are to hold formal merger talks following the recent
announcement by the College that its continued independence
is unsustainable. The intention of the talks is to develop a
business case for a merger and a proposed structure for a
merged institution. A detailed proposal, including a
consideration of the academic issues, will be presented to
the next meetings of the respective Councils in March and
April.
The decision to enter detailed talks follows a
resolution by the College Council at its February meeting to
seek a merger from 1 January 2006 with a university, with
Canterbury named as the most eligible candidate.
College
Principal Dr Graham Stoop said the move reflected New
Zealand and international trends towards teacher training
being undertaken within a university setting, in line with
other professions such as law and engineering.
University Chancellor Dr Robin Mann said his Council had
taken a very positive view of the proposal to merge the two
institutions. “There’s been a long association between the
University and College and we are very good friends. I look
forward to seeing the detailed proposal and the business
case next month,” he said.
If both institutions elect to
pursue a merger they will need to consult the Tertiary
Advisory Monitoring Unit and the Tertiary Education
Commission, following which a final decision will be made by
the Minister of Education.
The Dunedin College of
Education will consider its future when its Council meets
this month, but it has no immediate merger plans in
mind.
PBRF panel member nominations close
Friday
Nominations for the twelve Performance-Based
Research Fund peer review panels for the 2006 Quality
Evaluation close this Friday. The TEC says it is keen to
ensure that the panels comprise people of high standing in
their respective subject areas, and that each panel has an
appropriate range of expertise to cover the subject area for
which it is responsible.
Current panel chairs and
moderators will assist in the selection of panel members
using agreed panel selection criteria. It is expected that
membership of the panels will be announced by late
April.
Further information can be found on the TEC
website www.tec.govt.nz
Worldwatch
VCs’ salaries at
“outrageous levels”
The salaries of the United Kingdom’s
vice-chancellors have been labeled as outrageous by
lecturers’ union NATFHE after it was revealed this week that
they have doubled in the last decade to an average of
£210,000 for the top twenty earners.
While the pay for
vice-chancellors has doubled, lecturers’ salaries have only
increased by between 35 and 40 percent over the same time.
NATFHE spokesperson Roger Kline said that while several
vice-chancellors say their institutions are under financial
pressure and are struggling to implement the national pay
agreement, they are able to reward themselves handsomely.
“This will go down badly with teaching staff and researchers
whose recent pay rises have barely kept up with
inflation.”
Leading the vice-chancellors’ salary field is
Professor Laura Tyson of University College London who
picked up £310,000 in the 2003-04 year, while the biggest
winner was Dr Brian Roper, Vice-Chancellor of the
industrially troubled London Metropolitan University. His
salary has increased from £84,888 in 1994 to £190,000 last
year, an increase of 124 percent in the decade.
Ukraine
orders universities to reinstate students
Universities in
the Ukraine must reinstate students and staff who were
expelled or fired last year because of their political
activity during the presidential elections, according to an
order issued last week by the Ministry of Education and
Science.
The Ministry warned that those who failed to
comply with the order, issued on behalf of President Viktor
Yushcenko, would be held liable for violating the
constitutional rights of the affected students and
staff.
Chronicle of Higher Education
Australian
university market to be deregulated
Overseas colleges and
private universities will be encouraged to open up in
Australia as part of the Howard Government’s higher
education reforms. Education Minister Brendan Nelson has
outlined a push to relax the strict guidelines that
currently stop overseas and privately-run institutions
claiming the title of university, saying that a shake-up
would offer students greater choice.
Academics and the
Australian Labor Party say that the plan would devalue the
reputation of Australian courses, and would rob the work
“university” of meaning.
Dr Nelson is to release a report
recommending a major overhaul of the “national protocols”
governing which institutions can claim the title of
university and what academics can teach. If implemented, the
changes would also present a dramatic departure from the
rules governing publicly-funded universities, allowing them
to become research-only or teaching-only
institutions.
The
Australian
********************************************************************************
AUS
Tertiary Update is compiled weekly on Thursdays and
distributed freely to members of the Association of
University Staff and others. Back issues are available on
the AUS website: www.aus.ac.nz . Direct enquires should be
made to Marty Braithwaite, AUS Communications Officer,
email:
marty.braithwaite@aus.ac.nz