For its deliciously
dark wit and genre-bending ingenuity, Parasite has
just won four out of a potential six Academy Awards,
including Best Picture. Only ten foreign-language films have
previously been nominated for Best Picture and none have won
before. It is also the first time since Marty in 1955
that the winner of the Palme d’Or at Cannes has progressed
to a Best Picture Oscar. In his acceptance speech for Best
Director, Bong Joon-ho not only thanked Quentin Tarantino
for championing his work, but also payed tribute to Martin
Scorsese, confessing that when he was young he “carved
deep into my heart” and even quoting him directly - “The
most personal is the most creative.” Bong then graciously
surrendered the stage to two of his leading actors -
Jeong-eun Lee, who said she felt “a very opportune moment
in history is happening right now,” and Hye-jin Jang, who
praised Bong's “crazy hair, the way he talks, the way he
walks ... and especially the way he directs.”
At a
time when the 400 richest Americans have more money than the
bottom 150 million, a crooked billionaire real estate
developer occupies the White House, and a leading candidate
for the US presidency is proposing a wealth tax, it is
hardly surprising that Parasite has already become
one of the highest grossing foreign-language films in the
US. Even billionaire financier Ray Dalio, founder of hedge
fund manager Bridgewater Associates, is alarmed about what
has become of the disappearing middle class. In a widely
discussed social media post, Dalio said the “world has
gone mad and the system is broken.” Ultra-low interest
rates are punishing savers and rewarding borrowers since
money has become essentially free for those who already have
plenty of it, but “unavailable to those who don’t.”
The same wealth-gap has emerged in South Korea, a country
that used to rank near the bottom of thirty-six nations in
terms of income inequality, according to the Organisation
for Economic Co-operation and Development. “At the heart
of the film is this critique of capitalism that is not
unique to Korea,” commented Jason Bechervaise, a professor
of entertainment and arts at South Korea’s Soongsil Cyber
University. “There is a lot of anger out there, and
Parasite captures this in a manner that is wholly
unpredictable.”
Parasite has a simple
message, perfectly calibrated for 2020 - life is rarely fair
and inequality is increasing everywhere. Why should one
family live in a mansion, while another inhabits a squalid
basement, folding pizza boxes for money, and scrounging free
WiFi signals? What would happen if Family No. 2 literally
moved in on family No. 1? This is the essential conceit of
Parasite. The setting could just have easily been
Auckland, San Francisco, or London - indeed, any large city
in which the growing gap between the rich and poor is
sparking major resentment. The only difference is that this
movie takes place in South Korea, a nation whose rapid
economic development has been dominated by a handful of
family-controlled conglomerates and the poverty rate is
rapidly expanding to American levels.
There are few
movies like Parasite being made these in Hollywood
days. In a celluloid landscape dominated by comic-book
blockbusters, re-booted franchises, and opulent Netflix
Originals, domestic social satires about class and
inequality are becoming as rare as monarch butterflies,
largely because myopic movie moguls seem to believe
small-scale films no longer belong in theatres. They simply
assume they are better suited to those massive,
liquid-crystal TV monitors that seem like someone has parked
an SUV in the living room, while modern television networks
imagine films like Parasite should be stretched out
to an Emmy-winning, boxed DVD set. It is also the reason why
critics take to such films with all the fervour of an
alcoholic downing a double Scotch after Dry January. Dulled
senses tingle once more as idling brains spark up and
audiences succumb to the old-fashioned power of pure
narrative story-telling. There are no ridiculously acrobatic
car chases, deafening explosions, or CGI enhanced
intergalactic battles in Parasite. Instead, Bong
transports us into the mundane lives of two Korean families
who become increasingly entwined. One family lives in
poverty in a squalid subterranean flat at the wrong end of
the wrong end of town. The other enjoys a life of luxury in
their architect-designed home, the sort of glass and concrete
social statement that attracts new money like an auction of
awful modern art. According to the unwritten rules of social
engagement, as decreed by the pitiless market economics of
corporate capitalism, such families should never cross
paths.
The unemployed family live together in a
squalid and chaotic basement flat, with the teenage son and
daughter holding their smartphones up to the ceiling to
pinch the non-password-protected wifi from neighbours and
nearby businesses. Veteran Korean movie star Song Kang-ho
plays Kim Ki-taek, the patriarch of the 'have-not' household
as a laid-back idler who can look back on a twenty-year
business career notable for its remarkable consistency -
whatever enterprise he runs inevitably goes pear-shaped. His
son is an equally shiftless young dude who has flunked the
university entrance exams four times and his daughter Ki-jung is a cool customer with an artistic gift for web-based
fraud. His wife and erstwhile hammer-throwing track and
field medallist Chung-sook is as unemployed as
her husband. This is a
family who never expected much from life, but even their
hopes have turned out to be a pipe dream. To make matters worse, a local drunk has identified
their basement window as an alfresco urinal.
Meanwhile, over on easy street, the freshly minted,
slightly younger Park family are enjoying the life of
Reilly. The Park patriarch is as successful at business as
Ki-Taek is a failure. His IT firm has gone global and the
money is rolling in faster than a Bondi Beach surfer pursued
by a shark. His beautiful wife and three dogs flit in and out of their
beautiful house while their two beautiful kids are
supervised by their seemingly loyal housekeeper Moon-gwang. Last year's Roma was set
in a similar milieu, albeit fifty years earlier and in
Mexico City. These two polarised families of the same size
may live in the same city, but remain worlds apart, until a
friend of Ki-Woo's suggests he take over his holiday job
tutoring the Park's spoiled teenage daughter. Ki-Woo assumes
he will never get the gig, but has failed to take
into account Mrs. Park's naivety, his mother's eye for the
main chance, and the potential benefits of harnessing his
sister's artistic talents as a manufacturer of fake degree
certificates. Posing as a college student, Ki-woo starts to tutor the Park's teenage daughter Da-hye,
whose instant crush on him is something the charming Ki-woo
does nothing to discourage. Before he knows it, he has
managed to worm his way into this nouveau-rich sanctum,
wandering around in the eerily spotless house, and going way
beyond his strictly academic brief with the Da-hye.
When the delicate, unworldly mistress of the house, Yeon-kyo
asks if this smart young man might also recommend an art
tutor for her traumatised young son Da-song, he passes off his sister as the cousin of a
friend and her brazen grifter-sense of exactly when and how
to appear confidently arrogant bags her the job. These
manipulative interlopers cunningly contrive to get the
family chauffeur fired and replaced with their dad, then
dislodge the housekeeper and install their placidly smiling
mum in her place.
This is far from your average social
drama film, but rather a bizarre black comedy about
social status, materialism, the patriarchal family unit, and
a class of people who eagerly embrace the idea of leasing
out servants. It goes much further than such movies as
Revolutionary Road or Shoplifters, that gradually morphs into thriller territory. It is a weirdly potent
admixture and extremely well directed, as Bong's camera
often lingers on a scene to the point of awkwardness,
challenging the characters to maintain their composure as
the tangled web of deceit starts to fray at the seams.
Described by its creator as “a comedy without clowns, a
tragedy without villains,” the movie's title conveys the
humiliation endured by the poor who are forced to live off
the wealthy, for whom the word parasite is equally
applicable. It is also questions the economic and political
philosophies upon which their lives are built. Bong achieves
this with great incision and intelligence, and without
judging his characters. There is no pity or resentment in
Parasite, which is beautifully shot and paced to
perfection, until the end when what was a subtle, nuanced
work of art lurches into a melodramatic zombie flick. Bong refuses to play by
the rules and the clashing of genres is a formal echo of the
interaction between these two families from opposite ends of
the social spectrum. It looks as if the wealthy Parks could
be a meal ticket for the whole crooked family, all
pretending to be complete strangers to each other. But
Da-song has noticed something the adults seem willing to
ignore - why do these people all smell the same?
Although Parasite revolves around a wealthy
family in a modern-day upstairs-downstairs situation, this
is by no means simply a Korean version of Downton
Abbey, playing on established rules of a class system.
Rather, it is a reflection on how people act and react, are
seen and not seen, depending on their financial status. It
asks us what we would do if desperate. You might leach off
someone else's internet connection, but would you fumigate
your kitchen by opening the basement window when a lorry
passed by spraying insect-killer? The film could perhaps
deliver its payoff with more despatch, but nonetheless it is
a highly enjoyable movie about a mix of servitude and
trickery - an ongoing theme in contemporary Korean cinema.
This sumptuously designed film shares many of its concerns
with Park Chan-wook's The Handmaiden (an adaptation
of Sarah Walters' novel Fingersmith), and Im
Sang-son's The Housemaid, a remake of Kim
Ki-Young’s classic Korean thriller from 1960. Also notable
is the film’s focus on poverty, desperation, and the
phenomenon of those in debt having to disappear in order to
evade creditors, a theme also explored in Lee Chang-dong's
Burning.
Domestic servants possess an intimate
knowledge of their employers, and yet this intimacy may be
easily poisoned with resentment. There is a licensed
transgression in servitude, and this transgression is
nightmarishly amplified when it is a question of a entire
family seeking to get up close and personal. The poorer
family see themselves in a distorting mirror that cruelly
reveals to them how wretched they are by contrast and
reveals the riches that could (and perhaps should) be
theirs. It is a scabrous and almost supernatural story - an
invasion of the lifestyle snatchers - that resonates well beyond its generic limits. It asks significant questions about social status, aspiration, materialism,
the patriarchal family unit, even the very idea of employing
servants in the first place. It clearly delineates the suppressed horror of the
upper class for its servants and its morbid distaste for
those who have to use public transport. The satirical reflex
extends to a vision of South and North Korea living together
in paranoid, resentful intimacy, and its climax is
precipitated by an almost Biblical climate-emergency
catastrophe. As Mark Kermode suggested in his review for
The Guardian, Parasite's toxic tendrils have a
disturbing way of working themselves under your skin, just
like Ki-Taek's stale, kimchee-scented
sweat.
Parasite has provided a sort of
coronation for Bong, who has been a favourite on the
art-house/cinephile circuit for many years. There is little
consensus, however, on whether it should be considered a
thriller, a dark comedy, a family melodrama, or a piece of
social commentary. Even the meaning of the title is up for
debate, recalling Bong’s earlier breakthrough, The
Host, which seemed equally perplexing when it was
released in 2007. The truth, of course, is that it contains
elements from all of the above. Parasite purrs
through a series of exquisitely calibrated surprises,
rewarding audiences with gleeful, white-knuckle tension,
gallons of class resentment, and gales of laughter with the
luxurious smoothness of Ki-taek's Mercedes-Benz. It is
genuinely unclassifiable, tapping into a rich cinematic
tradition of unreliable servants with an intimate knowledge
of their employers, an intimacy that easily, and inevitably,
congeals into hostility. Just as the action segues from
slapstick to horror and back within the space of a single
scene, so Bong plays things straight even as madness
beckons, ensuring that the underlying elements of pathos are
amplified rather than undercut by pastiche. The Park family
hire musicians to to perform Handel's aria Spietati, io vi giurai from
Rodelinde. It is expansive, airy, and caressingly
sumptuous, not far removed from the Care selve arioso
from Atalanta that the smug wealthy couple enjoy
listening to in Michael Haneke’s home-invasion horror flick
Funny Games before their own dark appointment with
destiny. Jung Jae-il’s magnificently modulated score
matches the film’s tonal shifts perfectly, moving from the
sombre piano patterns of the curtain-raiser, through symphonic cues, to the cracked craziness of choric vocals clashing with a
musical saw.
Joseph Losey’s The Servant
invoked a comparable transgression, nightmarishly amplified
here by the sheer number of people getting up close and
personal, but Parasite also slots squarely into a
Korean tradition of films such as Kim Ki-young’s thriller
The Housemaid from 1960 (remade in 2010 by Im
Sang-soo) and Park Chan-wook’s con-trick drama The
Handmaiden, as well as the claustrophobic horror of his
Oldboy. As part of the New Korean Cinema that
electrified the festival circuit in the early 2000s, Bong
joined directors like Kim Ki-duk (The Isle) and Kim
Jee-woon (A Tale of Two Sisters) in reinvigorating
genre pictures with stylistic bravado and a dizzying ability
to play around with tone. More than any of his Korean
contemporaries, however, Bong has consistently defied
categorization, with seven films that snake across the
borders normally separating creature features from family
tragedies, grim procedurals and farcical slapstick comedies.
Parasite may have a distinctly Korean flavour, but
its themes and characters remain universal and timeless. Not
only did classic Japanese film-makers such as Ozu and
Mizoguchi know such people, but so do we.
All of
Bong's films are currently available to stream, so now is an
opportune moment to revisit of one of world cinema’s most
exciting and unpredictable filmmakers. A deep distrust of
wealth and authority has been a recurrent feature of his
work since his 2003 breakout feature Memories of
Murder, and continues through such diverse offerings as
The Host, Mother, Okja, and
Snowpiercer, to which Parasite makes several
knowing nods. After directing two straight English-language
films that failed earn him a toehold in Hollywood, Bong
returned to Korea for Parasite, which has now
catapulted investigates the inherent problems of a gig
economy in which the 'haves' subtly maintain their grip on
power by playing off the 'have-nots' against each other. In
the case of Parasite, the home invaders gaze on their
super-rich employers and see themselves in a distorting
mirror that pitilessly reveals how wretched they really are.
In many ways, it resembles a supernatural sci-fi story - the
invasion of the lifestyle snatchers. This is a horribly
fascinating film, brilliantly written, superbly furnished
and designed, with a glorious ensemble cast put to work in
an elegantly plotted nightmare. Although Bong explicitly
addressed similar themes in Snowpiercer and
Okja, here he is content to keep them simmering just
below the surface tension. Where the film goes - and where
Bong’s career goes after this - remains as fascinating and
unpredictable as the rest of his
work.