Govt To Loosen Rules On Overseas Building Products – Expert Reaction

Published: Sat 6 Apr 2024 06:30 AM
The Government has announced three changes to the Building Act with the intention of making it easier and cheaper to bring in overseas building materials to New Zealand.
The changes deal with recognising certain overseas building product standards and certification schemes.
The SMC asked independent experts to comment.
Professor John Tookey, School of Future Environments, AUT, comments:
“The concept of recognising materials standards from other jurisdictions is sound. For example the US, Europe, and Australia all have similar standards for construction products. The devil will be in the implementation detail. The current problem is the time and cost associated with the testing necessary to receive NZ code compliance from BRANZ etc. This places a natural handbrake on new product introductions. The cost to test to New Zealand standards is disproportionate to the profits achievable in a small economy like New Zealand. New Zealand is an expensive economy to service, with substantial shipping and internal logistics costs. The challenges come down to which standards we adopt from which jurisdictions. New Zealand has some unique and essential performance requirements. These include seismic performance, U-V stability for painted / surface treatments and moisture tolerance amongst others. Hence it is unlikely to be possible to accept all products from any one particular jurisdiction.
“A major factor in this proposal will be the perception of risk for construction funders. Most construction is undertaken with borrowed capital. Banks therefore have the value at risk. Banks will have a profound interest in any (actual or perceived) ‘loss of value’ from reduced product durability. Hence any selected equivalent standards should ideally be higher than our current ones. In addition, insurance companies are going to be similarly concerned. Durability of construction materials and potential ‘through life’ differences in wear and tear losses will need to be funded. Consequently insurers will need to be placed well ‘on side’ with this initiative if they are to provide similar coverage and premiums.
“Ultimately this will require someone, with very significant ‘signing off’ capacity in government, to identify which codes from which countries are equivalent to our own. While the initiative is commendable, signing off on the risks may be a problem. The spectre of our leaky building past will give pause for thought.”
No conflict of interest.
Science Media Centre
Our aim is to promote accurate, evidence-based reporting on science and technology by helping the media work more closely with the scientific community.
The Science Media Centre is New Zealand's only trusted, independent source of information for the media on all issues related to science. Thousands of news stories providing context from and quoting New Zealand researchers have been published as a direct result of our work.
Contact science media center
Postal Address:
PO Box 598, Wellington 6140

Next in Business, Science, and Tech

Christchurch Man Becomes First NZer To Win Apple Design Award
By: Payper
Fact Checking Artificial Intelligence
Partnering Indigenous Knowledge Systems And Western Science To Help Freshwater Thrive
By: Zealandia
Download Weekly: 3g use slows as networks face closure
By: Bill Bennett
Advice From Previous Winners Ahead Of $50m Powerball Must Be Won Draw
By: Lotto New Zealand
On The Brink – How Central Bank Digital Currency Threatens Civil, Constitutional And Human Rights
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media