The Business Energy Council (BEC) says several reports released this week show the need to carefully consider trade-offs
as we move toward a more sustainable energy future.
BEC Executive Director Tina Schirr says the long-awaited release of New Zealand’s first national EV charging strategy, the latest IPCC report, Castalia's report on 2035/2050 vision for gas, and the Consumer Advisory Council's sentiment survey results each send a clear message that as we move away from the status quo and towards more renewable energy, timely investment
will be critical.
"When investing, it’s important we don’t box the sector in with reactive policies which only create barriers to achieve
the transition itself.
"It’s also clear that in discussing these trade-offs, more consultation and public debate is needed."
A survey commissioned by the Consumer Advocacy Council shows that there will be some trade-offs between an increased
level of system resilience and associated cost.
"Cyclone Gabrielle has shown the severe impact that outages have and highlighted the need for New Zealand’s electricity
network to be more resilient to a changing climate.
"Consumers worry about the cost of electricity, both today and in the future. But resilience comes at a cost."
The Government’s long-term strategic vision for national electric vehicle charging infrastructure shows that New Zealand
is at the start of its transition journey.
"This requires us to think hard about how our new EV charging infrastructure can avoid cost increases in our electricity
distribution network - a network already facing the brunt of extreme weather," Schirr says.
A new report released by advisory firm Castalia to inform the NZ government’s gas transition plan shows that moving too
fast on the gas phase out could come with large costs for consumers, and risk security of supply.
"All of these publications grapple with challenges around the energy trilemma and underline the big questions that need
answering as the election nears: Who will pay for extra resilience, and how much is enough? Are we prepared to pay the
costs, and risk security of supply that could arise from moving too fast?"