Two More Sunscreens Fail To Meet SPF Claims

Published: Thu 8 Apr 2021 02:41 PM
Consumer NZ has found two more sunscreens have failed to meet their SPF claims, with one also failing to meet broad-spectrum requirements.
In 2020, Consumer NZ tested 10 sunscreens and found only five were up to standard.
Consumer NZ chief executive Jon Duffy said its latest test found Neutrogena Beach Defence Water + Sun Barrier Lotion Sunscreen SPF50 returned an SPF of 36.5. It also failed to meet the requirements needed to make a broad-spectrum claim. Consumer NZ sent another bottle of this sunscreen to a second lab, which also found it failed to meet its SPF claim.
Johnson & Johnson Pacific, which markets Neutrogena, said its sunscreens complied with the Australian and New Zealand sunscreen standard. The company provided test reports from 2012 to support its SPF and broad-spectrum claims.Neutrogena SPF claim failure nothing new
Consumer NZ previously lodged a complaint with the Commerce Commissionas a result of another Neutrogena sunscreen failing to meet SPF claims. In December 2017, Johnson & Johnson New Zealand signed court-enforceable undertakingswith the commission, agreeingthat its sunscreenssold herewould meet the standard.
Hamilton Active Family Sunscreen SPF50+ failed to meet its SPF claim, returning an SPF of 50. This is below the SPF 60 required to make a 50+ claim. Testing of another bottle of the sunscreen at a second lab also found it failed to meet its claim.
Key Pharmaceuticals, which owns the Hamiltonbrand, provided Consumer NZ with 2018 test results from a US lab to support its SPF50+ claim. The company said it had “no reason to doubt the integrity” of the results.
“Consumer NZ is calling for manufacturers to regularly test sunscreens, as well as a mandatory sunscreen standard in New Zealand. Currently, sunscreens sold in New Zealand may not have been tested at all,” Duffy said.
“It’s not good enough that sunscreens remain unregulated, particularly in a country with one of the highest rates of skin cancer and melanoma in the world. New Zealanders deserve better.”About Consumer NZ sunscreen lab testing
Accreditedlabstested thesunscreensfollowingthemethodsin theAustralian and New Zealand standardAS/NZS2604:2012.Consumer NZ samples were sent “blind” to the labsand packed according totheir instructions. Johnson & Johnson have questioned Consumer NZ’s decision tosend products to the labs“blind”– that is, decanted intounbranded containers.We stand byourdecision and don’t believeour processraises any valid concerns.
Read full sunscreen test results here.

Next in Business, Science, and Tech

Govt To Deliver Lower Card Fees To Business
By: New Zealand Government
SEEK NZ Employment Report - April 2021
By: SEEK New Zealand
Commission Warns Genesis Over Business Billing Errors
By: Commerce Commission
Lower Job Security Linked To Lower Life Satisfaction
By: Statistics New Zealand
The outlook for coral reefs remains grim unless we cut emissions fast — new research
By: The Conversation
Why Now Would Be A Good Time For The Reserve Bank Of New Zealand To Publish Stress Test Results For Individual Banks
By: The Conversation
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILE © Scoop Media