INDEPENDENT NEWS

White v James Hardie: Security for costs

Published: Tue 19 Feb 2019 05:07 PM
IN THE HIGH COURT OF NEW ZEALAND
AUCKLAND REGISTRY
I TE KŌTI MATUA O AOTEAROA
TĀMAKI MAKAURAU ROHE
CIV-2015-404-2981 (WHITE)
[2019] NZHC 188
[…]
[1] The defendants, collectively known as James Hardie, seek security for costs in the White proceedings in the sum of $350,000 in respect of discovery and inspection. This comprises $250,000 for costs and $100,000 for expert fees. The order is sought against the litigation funder, Harbour Fund II, L.P (“Harbour”) and the plaintiffs. Disclosure of the funding arrangements is also sought.
[2] A feature of this case is that collectively the plaintiffs are not impecunious. The central issue is whether security can and should nevertheless be made because of Harbour’s involvement. I have resolved that it should.
Background
[3] This is a large and complex case. It will be very costly. In short, the owners of 1241 properties claim James Hardie sold defective cladding products over a span of some 27 years. There are five heads of claim, including negligence, breach of duty to warn or withdraw products, negligent misstatement, breach of the Consumer Guarantees Act and or the Fair-Trading Act. Unsurprisingly, the proceedings have been staged. The first stage (Stage 1) will address specified issues1 and is subject to tailored discovery.2 Even so, the Stage 1 discovery process will exact a heavy toll in terms of resourcing and associated cost.3
Full judgment [PDF]

Next in Business, Science, and Tech

Industry plan could create a billion dollar gaming sector
By: New Zealand Game Developers Association
Government moves to protect elite soils
By: New Zealand Government
Calls for overhaul of gene-technology regulations
By: Royal Society Te Aparangi
Card spending dips in July
By: BusinessDesk
Govt takes more action to reduce waste
By: New Zealand Government
Fonterra Provides Update on Earnings
By: Fonterra
NZ gaming industry outlines plan for home-grown 'Angry Birds
By: BusinessDesk
Interactive media a game changer for digital economy
By: New Zealand Government
Potatoes vs people: govt moves to protect top vege-growing
By: BusinessDesk
New Zealand First Backs Plans to Protect Productive Land
By: New Zealand First Party
LGNZ cautious as government pits potatoes against houses
By: Local Government NZ
HortNZ welcomes safeguarding of country’s best growing soils
By: Horticulture NZ
Anti-housing rules to keep Kiwis locked out
By: New Zealand Taxpayers' Union
Productive farming land dug up for housing
By: RNZ
Gene editing regulations – Expert Reaction
By: Science Media Centre
View as: DESKTOP | MOBILEWe're in BETA! Send Feedback © Scoop Media