The ongoing negotiations on fisheries subsidies at the World Trade Organization (WTO) risk overriding one of the key
benefits from a trade deal with the European Union, claims the Pacific Network on Globalisation (PANG).
Speaking this week at the annual World Trade Organization Public Forum, PANG told delegates that the negotiations on
fisheries subsidies can place additional requirements on tinned fish exports from PNG and any other country that signs
up to an interim Economic Partnership Agreement (iEPAs) with the EU.
“The language being proposed by the European Union as well as other countries like New Zealand will make any new WTO
rules apply to fish that lands in Pacific Island member states. This will undermine the hard negotiated win on global
sourcing and make it even harder for Pacific Island Countries such as PNG to benefit from their most valuable natural
resources,” comment PANG's Trade Justice Campaigner, Mr Adam Wolfenden.
In the interim Economic Partnership Agreement (iEPAs) a global sourcing clause applies to canned tuna, allowing Papua
New Guinea to source fish from any country, process it domestically and then export to Europe with no import taxes
applied to it.
“The 2019 deadline is approaching and any Pacific WTO-Member like Fiji, Solomon Islands and Samoa that are looking to
export fish to the European Union will need to examine these negotiations carefully to ensure that there is no winding
back of benefits,” added Mr Wolfenden
The WTO negotiations on fisheries subsidies are borne out of Sustainable Development Goal 14.6 and aim to eliminate
harmful subsidies that contribute to Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated fishing as well as overfishing and
over-capacity whilst also recognising the special and differential needs of developing countries.
“The WTO has a mandate to deal with the issue of subsidies and it must stick to that. It cannot be acceptable to have
countries like the EU and New Zealand bringing conservation and management measures into these negotiations. These are
sovereign matters for the Pacific and they will continue to manage their resources”, continued Mr Wolfenden.
PANG will be joined on the panel by Dr Radika Kumar from University of the South Pacific as well as experts from the
South Centre and the Centre for WTO Studies.
“We are seeing the continuation of trade talks being used by big fishing nations to undermine the control the Pacific
has over its fisheries and limit the benefits that can be derived from them for Pacific peoples. If the talks continue
on their current path the outcome will be neither about sustainability or development,” conclude Mr Wolfenden.
Briefing notes by PANG on the issue can be found at www.pang.org.fj