Ensuring the extra tax revenue to be collected from some international visitors is spent wisely will be the focus of the
tourism industry, Tourism Industry Aotearoa says.
The Government has today released details of the proposed International Visitor Conservation and Tourism Levy. It would
see passengers paying between $25 and $35, and will not apply to New Zealanders, Australians, Pacific Forum member
countries, transit passengers, diplomats, some business travellers and children under two.
The main collection method will be a new Electronic Travel Authority, which visitors from visa-free countries like the
UK and USA will have to complete before travel. They will have to pay an estimated $9 for the ETA, on top of the visitor
levy. The levy will be added to the cost of visas for visa-required countries like China and India.
The money collected – an estimated $57m to $80m a year – will be split between conservation and tourism.
TIA Chief Executive Chris Roberts was at this morning’s announcement at Parliament.
“No final decisions have been made on the split between conservation and tourism, what sort of projects should be
funded, or how the decisions should be made. The tourism industry is ready to participate in a robust and constructive
discussion on these crucial details.
“Our international visitors will be more accepting of being charged to come to New Zealand if they can clearly see it is
going to support infrastructure and services that enhance their visit.”
The recent Government-commissioned report Financial Costs and Benefits of International Tourism has shown that through
existing taxes and charges the Government already gets a net benefit of around $700 per international visitor. That
money is used to fund other Government priorities.
“Our key priority with this new charge is ensuring the revenue is directed to where it can do the most good, relieving
pressure on infrastructure and ensuring we continue to deliver outstanding visitor experiences,” Mr Roberts says.
“We look forward to working with the Government to reach the best possible outcomes for New Zealand.”
ends