Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Southern Response Class Action to Proceed

Southern Response Class Action to Proceed

MEDIA RELEASE

Monday 30 October 2017

Mr Cameron, Solicitor for the policyholders in the Southern Response Class Action confirmed this afternoon, that “the group were very pleased to receive a positive judgment from the Court of Appeal” and that, “as this case has been held up on preliminary matters for far too long, the Court of Appeal’s decision will be of great relief to our clients”.

The key findings were:

- that in the High Court, Justice Gendall was right to grant leave for a representative action;

- and that the representative action procedure is a just and efficient means of dealing with these claims; and

- the Court of Appeal envisages that Southern Response yet be required to provide information about the proceedings to other potential claimants.

“We are pleased that the Court of Appeal has provided further directions as to how the pleadings might be amended to assist the efficient and timely management of the case through the High Court” said Mr Cameron. “Indeed the Court of Appeal was concerned at the time this case has taken to reach this stage and has firmly recommended cooperation between the parties to get things back on track. We anticipate that progress will also be made as soon as the new government comes to grips with the reality of the delays occasioned by its predecessor”.

The Court found that both the breach of contract allegations and the breach of good faith claims, could be properly dealt with through this mode of action and Mr Cameron stated that “the court accepted that the group was now free to prove to the High Court that Southern Response formulated and applied a strategy to misrepresent the nature of the claimant’s contractual rights and to delay the processing of those claims”.

Finally, the Court of Appeal also reversed the High Court decision to allow a further cooling off period for policyholders and specified how the High Court might yet be satisfied on the minor issues for those clients without a DRA at the end of April 2015.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.