Tuesday 11 October 2016 11:34 AM
Govt considering more incentives to encourage forest planting: Bennett
By Pattrick Smellie
Oct. 11 (BusinessDesk) - The government is considering measures to further encourage more forestry planting as it
examines whether locally grown forests will be cheaper than buying foreign carbon credits to meet its climate change
Climate Change Minister Paula Bennett told the Climate Change and Business Conference in Auckland that “how to get more
trees in the ground” is a key part of its work on the supply of carbon credits into the country’s emissions trading
scheme in the 2020s.
Earlier this month, the government ratified the new global climate change deal agreed at the annual global conference in
Paris last year, ahead of this year’s global meeting in Marrakech, Morocco, in December.
The early ratification was motivated by a need to be at the negotiating table when rules are set for the treatment of
plantation forestry and land use change, details of which will help determine how difficult it will be for New Zealand
to meet its obligations under the Paris agreement.
New Zealand committed to cut its greenhouse gas emissions 30 percent below 2005 levels by 2030, using a combination of
local emissions reductions, storing carbon in forests, and buying international carbon credits.
“Forestry is so important because it’s currently our most important source of domestic emission removals,” said Bennett.
“It can deliver at scale.
“If forestry is cheaper than purchasing international units, and we think it might be, there is a strong economic case
for planting more trees. For example: investing in 10,000 hectares of forestry in 2018 will deliver 3.1 million tonnes
of abatement over the 2020s, of the 235 million in total we need to reach our 2030 target.
“This could reduce the number of units we’ll need to purchase internationally. A key focus of the ETS review is looking
at how to promote more planting by ensuring there is a good price incentive to plant trees, but we are looking wider
Among forestry policy changes under consideration were “how to make the New Zealand ETS more attractive to foresters. We
know that forests (and foresters) come in all shapes and sizes, so it’s a matter of understanding what mix of approaches
fit best," she said.
“This includes looking at how forestry is accounted for in the New Zealand ETS, and how to reduce some of the
administrative and compliance costs faced by both foresters and the government.”
Plantation foresters have faced major policy uncertainty under the current government’s climate change policies. The
price of carbon collapsed below 50 cents a tonne earlier this decade when major emitters were allowed to use low-quality
and sometimes fraudulent credits bought from former Soviet blocs to offset local emissions.
Policy changes since then have seen the price of carbon rise, with the removal of a subsidy for major emitters earlier
this year pushing New Zealand Units of carbon to $18.80 per tonne from around $7 a year ago.
Foresters have said $15 a tonne is a trigger price for justifying plantation forestry investment, but the industry is
gun-shy, having ramped up planting in the past only to see policy changes undermine their decisions.
Bennett said “businesses need to know where policy is heading over the next five, 10 and 15 years so that they can have
confidence when investing in new technologies”.
“That’s absolutely my commitment.”
She said forestry also offered environmental and economic benefits beyond their impact on climate change and that
forestry policy would include encouragement for permanent and native forestry, as well as what Environmental Defence
Society head Gary Taylor called “pinus radiata syndrome”.
Erosion control, biodiversity and water quality benefits were all available from forest planting, along with
opportunities for our regional and iwi economies, and carbon removals beyond 2030, said Bennett.
She hoped to have a National Policy Statement on climate change in place in the next 12 months or so.
But Bennett expressed scepticism about suggestions New Zealand should adopt a UK-style ‘Committee on Climate Change’,
even as the government has begun efforts to gain cross-parliamentary support for key elements of long-term climate