Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Tests before tightening help protect farm fertility

Tests before tightening help protect farm fertility

Soil tests should be the first step for farmers trying to managing budgets while maintaining pasture productivity.

Ballance Science Extension Manager, Ian Tarbotton, says keeping soils fertile is good insurance with pasture an essential feed source, but gut instinct or past experience won’t lead to good decisions on what to spend or save.

“Soil tests will show you what you have to work with and they are the best guide to decisions around a fertiliser budget. The last thing farmers want to do is to compromise future productivity, so understanding what nutrients are available now is the best basis for decisions on fertiliser budgets.”

Ian says there are three main nutrients to focus on when it comes to soil fertility: phosphorus, sulphur and potassium, and how they behave in soil provides a clue for application decisions.

“Sulphur is very mobile in the soil, so usually requires annual applications. Potassium can leach too, notably on coarse textured soils. On the other hand, phosphorus gets stored in the soil, so depending on reserves it may be possible to defer phosphate fertiliser application. Some nutrients, such as magnesium and calcium, could be supplied directly to stock as a short-term measure.”

Phosphorus is a key driver of production, so if possible, levels should be kept in the optimum range and testing will confirm whether levels need attention.

If sedimentary soil is above the optimum Olsen P range of more than 40, then cutting out phosphate maintenance for a year will not affect production. If the range is more than 30, then half maintenance of phosphate will not lead to noticeable impacts. “But if the results sit under 25, then full maintenance phosphate as usual is advisable, as production will be affected at a time when farmers need to maintain it.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Ian said that if a farmer makes the call to omit or reduce phosphate, maintaining sulphur levels is important. “Cutting back on sulphur is false economy. It’s the cheapest form of macro-nutrient and we have slow release options available to sustain the benefit.”

Ian cautioned that another factor to consider when planning when to apply nutrients was the significant drop in the New Zealand dollar over the last 12 months, and that it was only a matter of time before the price of imported fertilisers would increase.

“Our team is here to help. Ballance nutrient specialists will factor in farmers goals, soil tests, product options and pricing to ensure farmers get the best possible return on their nutrient investment.”

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.