Chapman Tripp - Brief Counsel
New health and safety regime from 4 April next year
28 August 2015
The Health and Safety at Work Act has now been passed by Parliament and will come into effect on 4 April next year –
five and a half years since the Pike River Mine disaster which precipitated the reform.
The aim is to encourage a pro-active and participative health and safety culture in our workforce, in line with the
recommendations of the Health and Safety Taskforce and the Royal Commission report into Pike River.
Some changes were made to the initial Bill as it progressed through the House, which the Opposition parties consider
will weaken it. But the new regime will still be a significant improvement on what we have now.
We outline the new structure.
Penalties
The new Act has much bigger teeth than the existing legislation – providing more enforcement options and tougher
penalties.
Infringement notices with ‘on the spot’ fines will be available for:
minor breaches that warrant more than a warning but less than a prosecution, and
actions or omissions that involve straightforward issues of fact, and do not include qualifying phrases (such as “so far
as is easily practicable” or “reasonable steps”).
The Act establishes a three tier approach for offences:
Category 1 - reckless conduct; fines up to $600,000 for a director and/or five years in jail
Category 2 - exposing a person to serious harm; up to $300,000
Category 3 – breach of duty; up to $100,000.
The officer
The definition of officer has been fine-tuned through the legislative process and is now designed to capture directors
and very senior managers – which, in all but the largest firms, is likely to be just the Chief Executive.
Officers have a positive duty of due diligence which requires them to “take all reasonable steps” to ensure that the
PCBU (Person Conducting a Business or Undertaking – this will generally be the company or the employing organisation),
is fulfilling the organisation’s obligations under the law.
For directors, the duties will be similar to the discipline they have traditionally applied to managing financial risk
and will include:
maintaining an up-to-date knowledge of workplace health and safety matters
understanding the nature of the operations of the business and any associated risks and hazards, and
ensuring and verifying that the PCBU has access to, and uses, the resources, information and processes needed to
eliminate or – if elimination is not possible – to minimise safety risks.
The Act does not move liability from the company to its officers as the main duty of care will sit with the PCBU.
Currently a director or officer can be held liable for a fine of up to $500,000 and imprisonment for up to two years if
they knowingly “directed, authorised, assented to, acquiesced in, or participated in, the failure” to take all
practicable steps.
Less serious offences, where the director does not intend to create the offence and had no knowledge of it, are
presently limited to penalties of $250,000.
It has been rare for a director to be charged under the current Act, and those that have been were directors of very
small businesses.
Officers will be subject to the same penalties as PCBUs under the new Act.
Responsibilities of the PCBU
The PCBU is required to ensure the health and safety of those who work for the PCBU and those who could be put at risk
by that work. Where there are multiple PCBUs on a site and an overlap of duties, PCBUs must discharge their overlapping
responsibilities to the extent they have the ability to control the matter. They must also consult, cooperate and
coordinate their activities with the other PCBUs.
In high risk industries, the PCBU will have to establish a formal risk management process. This will require:
identifying all reasonably foreseeable hazards
involving workers and their representatives in developing the risk mitigation strategy
eliminating or minimising the risk so far as is reasonably practicable by:
substituting the hazard with something less hazardous and/or
isolating the hazard from any person who could be exposed to it and/or
implementing engineering controls, and if a risk still remains
putting in place administrative controls (work methods or procedures) or providing personal protective equipment, and
regularly reviewing the control measures to ensure they remain effective over time.
Workforce participation
All PCBUs have the right to appoint H representatives and/or H committees should they wish. PCBUs employing more than 20 people, and all businesses in sectors with moderate to high
risk of injury, are obliged to provide this representation if requested to do so by the workforce.
Regulations will specify, among other things:
the criteria for electing an H representative, the training to be provided, the term of office (three years) and procedures to terminate an
appointment
the process for determining the configuration of work groups (these must be negotiated between the PCBU and workers, and
must be designed to ensure that workers’ H interests are represented effectively and efficiently, and that H representatives are readily accessible to each worker in the group), and
the composition and meeting requirements of H committees (they must be at least half composed of workers not nominated by the PCBU, and the committees must meet at
least every three months, or at any reasonable time requested by least half of the committee members).
Smaller businesses (20 or fewer workers) in low risk industries do not have to appoint an H representative. PCBUs which meet the size test will be excluded from the exemption where there is:
a risk of a catastrophic event causing multiple deaths
a fatality rate greater than 25 per 100,000 workers
a serious injury rate in excess of 25 per 1000 workers, or
a likelihood of exposure to asbestos or silica.
Commencement of 4 April 2016
The new regime will come into force from 4 April 2016. From that date, duty holders will be expected to be compliant.
There is no transition period. Accordingly, businesses and individual officers should be taking the time now to review
their health and safety regimes to ensure that they will be best placed to meet the new regime.
ends