Can New Zealand reap the benefits of workplace diversity?
Can New Zealand reap the benefits of workplace diversity?
Why are organisations in New
Zealand falling short on diversity in the workplace? Could
it be that they are not rising to the challenges they face
when trying to achieve diversity?
In a poll of both employers and employees in New Zealand by recruiting experts Hays, 55% of employees say their organisation’s public face and the way they portray themselves on issues like diversity isn’t a true representation of the real business culture.
Of these, 34% said diversity is not a genuine concern for the organisation, 29% said the public face is a goal not reality, and 24% said line managers fail to genuinely embrace policies such as diversity when they recruit.
In further evidence supporting the case that more needs to be done, just 56% of organisations value mature-age workers, 29% employ people with a disability and 72% employ people from various cultural backgrounds. 53% of people are not satisfied with the career path available to women at their organisation.
“Over recent years there has been a notable increase in the number of diversity initiatives within both private and public sector organisations,” says Jason Walker, Managing Director of Hays in New Zealand.
“Yet those efforts do not seem to be achieving the changes we need to see. There are numerous reasons why organisations fall short of delivering on their diversity strategies. For some the challenge is about hiring or promotion mechanisms. For others, it is due to branding the diversity plan in a certain way, not securing executive commitment, or using ineffective training techniques.
“The benefits of diversity are that it can create a highly-engaged workforce that in turn will drive productivity and innovation, and therefore profitability,” he said.
According to Hays, there are 7 main challenges that employers face when trying to achieve diversity in New Zealand’s workplaces. These are:
1. Promoting
the business benefits:
Many managers, executives
and even HR teams fall short of understanding and promoting
the benefits of diversity within their organisation.
2. Personal prejudice:
This is a
difficult topic to explore, but unless hiring managers truly
embrace diversity with a positive attitude no edict from on
high will lead to true change.
3. Unconscious
bias
We need to unravel unconscious bias in the
recruitment process, particularly when it comes to managers
recruiting candidates like themselves.
4. The
‘merit’ argument
A common argument against
diversity holds that if you focus on recruiting a diverse
workforce you do not recruit the candidate with the very
best skills or experience. Of course the final recruitment
decision should always be based on who possesses the most
suitable skills and experience, but if there is not
diversity in your application pool how do you know you have
attracted the very best shortlist from which to select from?
5. Business culture
Many
organisations have inbuilt and often hidden elements in
their business culture that do not support diversity, such
as the perception in IT that women can’t code. HR, with
the support of the CEO, may need to drive cultural change in
support of diversity, which is no easy task.
6. Diversity fatigue
Diversity
fatigue refers to disinterest in diversity activities after
months or years of diversity programs. Causes include a
lack of executive involvement, failure to link programs with
a business case, or lack of accountability.
7. Integrating differences
Rather
than merely accepting people from different target groups,
diversity also means managing and integrating their varied
lifestyles, beliefs and needs to your business.
Hays presents six strategies to create a diverse workforce in its whitepaper, which was released last week, ‘The Balancing Act: Creating A Diverse Workforce’. It is based on a survey of 303 New Zealand employers and candidates.
Hays, the world’s leading recruiting experts in qualified, professional and skilled people.
ENDS