New Zealand organisations lag behind global counterparts in managing security and privacy risk
New Zealand organisations are trailing behind their global counterparts in managing their security and privacy risk,
according to findings from The Global State of Information Security® Survey 2015 by PwC, in conjunction with CIO and CSO
magazines.
PwC Partner and Cyber Practice Leader Adrian van Hest says, “New Zealand organisations were above average in developing
a cyber security strategy, however poorer when it comes to executing it, particularly the supporting elements such as
standards, policies, classification of data and tools such as identity management, activity monitoring, risk management
tools and encryption.
“So while senior executives in New Zealand organisations seem to be taking cyber security and privacy seriously by
assigning ownership and responsibility for this within their organisations, we’re behind other countries in a number of
key areas. For example, when it comes to privacy, we’re at odds with global practices such as requiring employees to
complete training on privacy policy, formally acknowledging compliance and imposing disciplinary measures for
violations. We’re also lagging behind in using big data analytics to measure the risk and impact related to information
security.
“These risks are exposing organisations to financial, regulatory, brand and productivity impacts and we’re encouraging
them to address these. Cyber risks will never be completely eliminated, so organisations must understand that the
perpetual and ever changing nature of threat, demands a fairly dynamic and proactive approach.”
Findings show that the number of detected incidents leapt 48%, to 42.8 million, the equivalent of 117,339 attacks per
day in 2013 and this increase comes at great cost with total financial losses attributed to security compromises
increasing 34% over 2013. Detected security incidents have increased 66 percent year-over-year since 2009, the survey
data indicates.
“It’s come as no surprise that the rising incidents and associated financial impacts continue to increase,” says Mr van
Hest. “The scale of the breaches is much larger and their impact extends to C-suite and the boardroom, with insider
incidents and high-profile crimes on the rise.”
Globally, big losses have been more common this year as organisations reporting financial hits in excess of US$20
million nearly doubled. Despite greater levels of concern, the survey found that global information security budgets
actually decreased 4 percent compared with 2013. Security spending as a percentage of IT budget has remained stalled at
4 percent or less for the past five years.
“New Zealand organisations are bucking this trend however and 67% plan to spend more on their security budgets in the
next 12 months. Hopefully this means the increased level of activity in ownership of the issues and a strategic approach
is now translating into investment and action.
“Organisations will need to identify and invest in cyber security practices that are most relevant to today’s advanced
attacks. It’s important that their processes are fully integrated for predictive, preventive, detective and
incident-response capabilities to minimise the likelihood and impact of incidents.
Meanwhile, high profile attacks by nation-states, organised crime and competitors are among the least frequent
incidents, yet the fastest-growing cyber threats. This year, respondents who reported a cyber-attack by nation-states
increased 86 percent – and those incidents are also most likely under-reported. The survey also found a striking 64
percent increase in security incidents attributed to competitors, some of whom may be backed by nation-states.
Effective security awareness requires top-down commitment and communication, a tactic that the survey finds is often
lacking across organisations.
“It is vitally important for companies to focus on rapid detection of security intrusions and to have an effective,
timely response. Given our interconnected business ecosystem, it is equally as important to establish policies and
processes regarding third parties. Larger organisations need to be particularly wary as they’re more likely to be
targets since they offer more valuable information and their size and complexity make attacks less likely to be
detected.
“Organisations must change from focusing on prevention and controls for security, to an information-centric and
risk-based approach that uses controls to enable the business Information is a powerful business asset and the right
approach to security and privacy will empower organisations to maximise its potential,” concludes Mr van Hest.
- ends –