Greater protections needed for migrant workers
17 July 2014
Greater protections needed for migrant workers
Exploitation of migrant workers in New Zealand is a growing issue and requires a significant investment in strengthening enforcement of minimum employment standards, says Multicultural New Zealand.
We
welcome the initiative of the Ministry of Business,
Innovation and Employment in producing a discussion document
on Playing by the Rules in response to increasing
reports of exploitation of migrant workers. Overall we
support the Ministry’s proposals to:
• Improve the
current sanctions regime to provide a sufficient deterrent
against non-compliance
• Change the enforcement
approach of the Labour Inspectorate and others to ensure
non-compliant employers have a higher chance of being
caught
• Provide information and advice to employers
and employees to assist compliance, and improve the
processes for dealing with alleged breaches.
We note that of the 5,937 issues dealt with by the Labour Inspectorate between July 2012 and December 2013, 1,404 involved migrant workers, and while migrant workers make up only 10 per cent of the working population, they accounted for 24 per cent of issues. We further note that over 50 per cent of these issues arose in only three industry sectors: accommodation and food services; agriculture forestry and fishing; and retail trade. We add that in recent times instances of exploitation of migrant workers have been reported in the Christchurch rebuild and in the agricultural and horticultural sectors.
Sanctions
We
support the Ministry’s proposals for increasing the
sanctions for failure to meet minimum employment standards:
naming and shaming, increasing financial penalties, taking
measures to restrict the ability of non-compliant employers
to do business, introducing criminal sanctions for the most
serious offences and improving the process for enforcing
debts. We are particularly concerned at what is described in
the document as “phoenixing” whereby companies are
deliberately wound up in order to avoid enforcement action.
This has also been described to us as the “corporate
veil”.
Identifying and investigating
breaches
We support the proposals for aligning
the requirements for record keeping across employment
legislation, requiring employers to keep time records for
low-paid salaried and piece-rate workers, broadening the
range of information Labour Inspectors can require, and
extending the powers of labour inspectors to access
information and make binding
determinations.
Improving compliance with
employment standards
We welcome the recently
increased investment in information provision on employment
standards to migrant workers in the Canterbury rebuild, and
the operational policy changes to assure migrant workers
that they will not be disadvantaged by making a complaint
against their employer. Such issues have concerned us for
some time and have been the subject of recent news reports
in Christchurch, Auckland and the Bay of Plenty, and further
action may well be required.
We would also emphasise the need for information to be provided in a range of languages, for labour inspectors to be trained in cross-cultural competencies, and for the labour inspectorate to have a diversity of staff representing the ethnic, cultural and linguistic diversity of the migrant workforce. We encourage the Ministry to provide financial support and training in employment law to community groups who represent and work with migrants. We support the proposals to expand the role of the Labour Contact Centre to deal with lower level breaches directly, to fast track less serious breaches through a separate system so that small claims can be dealt with quickly and easily, and to only use mediation when it is appropriate because of more complex issues of employment relationships rather than straightforward breaches of employment standards.
We emphasise that a key to greater compliance with employment standards is having sufficient Labour Inspectors to undertake the work. We understand that the ratio of Labour Inspectors to the workforce in New Zealand is much lower than in comparable jurisdictions overseas and there is an urgent need for an increase in the size of the Inspectorate. The recent initiative to boost numbers in Canterbury is an initial acknowledgment that improvements to the enforcement of employment standards for migrant workers cannot be achieved without additional resources.
ENDS