Media Release
19 March 2014
Labour’s “Pro-Wood” Policy Inappropriate
Labour’s “pro-wood” government procurement strategy will create an inappropriate commercial advantage for one
construction sector over another, according to the New Zealand cement and concrete industries.
Announced today by David Cunliffe at the ForestWood conference in Wellington, the policy would mandate that “all government-funded project proposals for new buildings up to four storeys high shall require a build-in-wood option
at the initial concept / request-for-proposals stage (with indicative sketches and price estimates).”
Rob Gaimster, CEO of the Cement & Concrete Association of New Zealand (CCANZ), believes that policies which appear to be giving preferential treatment to
one construction material are misguided.
“It is inappropriate to mandate that those designing new government buildings consider wood as a structural option, and
then require an explanation if an alternative material is chosen,” says Mr Gaimster.
“Government should not be picking winners when it comes to the selection of construction materials, which should stand
or fall on their own technical, cost, aesthetic and sustainability credentials.
“In addition, the policy does a huge dis-service to the hardworking men and women in the cement and concrete industries.
Favouring a single construction material during the design phase of a new government building could seriously impact on
their livelihoods and jobs.
“This policy does not create a level playing field for the use of construction materials in government buildings. In
fact, materials other than wood will be considerably disadvantaged.
“We are concerned about the wide-reaching implications of this policy and believe it should in no circumstances be
adopted.”
ENDS