Media Statement
7 November 2013 – for immediate release
IrrigationNZ applauds National Objectives Framework
IrrigationNZ has come out in support of the National Objectives Framework released today by Government saying the
integration of socio-economic and environmental objectives is the only way New Zealand will achieve long-term
sustainability.
“It’s good to see the recommendations of the Land and Water Forum being put into action and IrrigationNZ applauds the
scientists and planners behind the framework. It’s a sensible, well-informed first iteration and we look forward to its
further development,” says IrrigationNZ CEO Andrew Curtis.
Mr Curtis says communities will now be able to come together and make informed decisions around the values of local
waterways. “The framework delivers a more consistent approach to the setting of freshwater objectives and limits
throughout New Zealand. IrrigationNZ is particularly excited by the breadth of community values that have been captured.
Long term sustainability requires the marrying of socio economic and environmental aspirations and the framework
achieves that.”
Another highlight for IrrigationNZ is recognition within the framework that communities need flexibility as they work
towards meeting freshwater objectives.
“This is important as there are many factors impacting on water quality and a range of management approaches that can be
taken as a result. While much of New Zealand’s freshwater resource is in good shape, there are also hotspots that
urgently require attention. For IrrigationNZ, our contribution is working out how we better use water for irrigation and
the framework reinforces that with its focus on measurement. Irrigators understand the importance of monitoring and
measurement as our industry is founded on it. Our work programme is now based on improving water use efficiency and
minimising nutrient losses to groundwater and waterways which will go a long way to delivering improved freshwater
outcomes.”
The one jarring note for IrrigationNZ is the continuing debate around what should be included as attributes in the
national bottom lines.
“In reality it’s difficult to set national bottom lines for many attributes due to the diversity and complexity of our
landscape and waterbodies. Some freshwater attributes, particularly biotic-based indicators that are derived from
multiple parameters, are better set at the catchment level where scenario specific analysis can be undertaken.”
ENDS