Rio Tinto, Stop Crying Wolf
Just Close The Bluff Smelter & Bugger Off
Here we go again. Every time that Rio Tinto, the gargantuan mining and processing transnational which owns 80% of they
Bluff smelter, feels that its charmed existence in New Zealand is going to become less cushy, it threatens to pull the
plug, close the smelter and walk away. Last time it did so (in 2008) was because of the Labour Government’s proposed
emissions trading scheme. This time it is trying it on as a tactic to try to pressure Meridian over its power price
contract, which has already been negotiated and is due to take effect in January.
Campaign Against Foreign Control of Aotearoa (CAFCA) calls Rio Tinto’s bluff (pun intended) Stop crying wolf, stop using
your New Zealand workers as disposable pawns in your cynical game, stop holding Southland and the country to ransom. Go
ahead and close the smelter and bugger off. See if we care, the country will be much better off without you. The smelter
is the country’s single biggest user of electricity, consuming one sixth of the total, 24/7 for more than 40 years. It
pays a top secret super cheap price that is not available for any other user and all it does is export electricity from
NZ in the form of alumina, while being subsidised by all other electricity users. The smelter is the textbook example of
corporate welfare in New Zealand. It is the biggest bludger in the country. Those who extol the bracing discipline of
market forces for everybody else are strangely coy when it comes to this corporate recidivist.
Rio Tinto Alcan won the 2011 Roger Award for the Worst Transnational Corporation Operating In Aotearoa/New Zealand. It
was nominated for lobbying two Governments “over several years to secure excessive allocations of free emissions units
under the NZ Emissions Trading Scheme”.
The Roger Award judges agreed, concluding: “It appears therefore, that the New Zealand taxpayer is subsidising a
transnational corporate rort of the emissions trading scheme… The significance of this stance cannot be underestimated; a major transnational player
within New Zealand materially benefits from its non-compliance with a strategy to reduce global climate change and its
ecological effects”.
The Judges’ Report concludes that the company has a 50 year history of “suborning, blackmailing and conning successive
New Zealand governments into paying massive subsidies on the smelter’s electricity; dodging tax, and running a
brilliantly effective PR machine to present a friendly, socially responsible and thoroughly greenwashed face to the
media and the public. Its milking of the Emissions Trading Scheme is entirely in character”.
The extremely detailed Financial Analysis reveals that the smelter’s claimed benefits to NZ, namely annual export
earnings of “around $1 billion” are, in fact, overstated by four fifths.
The full, damning, 2011 Roger Award Judges’ Report can be read at http://canterbury.cyberplace.co.nz/community/CAFCA/publications/Roger/Roger2011.pdf
In short, it is a liability to New Zealand, not an asset.
What about the people who work for the smelter, directly or indirectly? The tobacco industry used to employ a lot of
people here, but that was deemed to be no longer in the public interest. Lacing lollywater with booze and selling it to
kids supports a lot of jobs too but there’s plenty of public demand to get rid of that particular industry as well. The
P industry provides an income for thousands of people too, but we don’t hear any demand for that insidious trade to be
kept going to keep them in a job. History is full of examples of horrible industries that kept people in jobs (such as
the slave trade) but which were banned and/or abolished for the greater good.
This smelter constitutes a crime against the people of New Zealand and has done for its entire existence.
In the national interest, it must be closed and the sooner the better.