Union Should Explain Why Workers In Nelson And Not At Work
Union Should Explain Why Workers In Nelson And Not
At Work
Affco today called on the Meat
Workers Union to explain why its members were in Nelson at
CTU organised publicity stunts today when they could have
been back at work.
Affco Operations Director, Rowan
Ogg says the Union’s actions are bizarre given that it
rejected Affco’s offer to get all its members back to
work.
Mr Ogg said the Union had still not explained
publicly why it rejected an offer last week that would have
seen all its members return to work.
“The Union
is forcing hardship on its members with the ongoing
strikes. After making constructive offers to the Union,
it’s now up to Union leadership to demonstrate a real
desire to make progress.”
Mr Ogg said the company
has been frustrated at the Union’s failure to put any
alternative options to the company’s new Collective terms
during past mediation attempts.
Affco has also
guaranteed that workers’ daily pay would not be affected
by the operational Collective changes.
Affco’s
back to work offer came after 8 weeks of strike action by
the Union. The Union instead extended strike action.
The majority of Affco’s workers are not Union
members and are working as normal with all plants
operational.
Industrial Dispute Fact
Sheet:
The Meat Workers Union has made a
number of incorrect and misleading claims in its statements
regarding the dispute. These are set out below, along with
the facts:
Union
Claim:
“Talley’s has stopped workers from
being able to go to work and earn an income to feed their
kids.”
Fact:
This dispute
is between Affco and its workers.
There are 450
workers across all Affco plants that remain locked out.
There are 1100 Union members who are on strike.
Last week Affco offered to restart all striking
workers if the Union ended its strike action and engaged in
meaningful mediation during the return to work. The Union
rejected this offer. Despite this Affco lifted the lockout
notice for a further 300 workers. The Union refused this
return to work instead keeping all those workers out on
strike
Union Claim:
“First
Affco locked out 1,000 workers and their families after only
10 hours of face to face negotiations, then they told us
they only came to mediation becausethey were legally
required to, then they cancelled a mediation session and now
they've tabled a completely new
document.”
Fact:
Negotiations
commenced mid November, the lockout occurred at the end of
February, the company had conceded about half of its claims;
the Union had conceded none of theirs.
The
mediation was postponed, as a result of the union placing
court action on conflicting dates.
The document is
not new, but combines the existing agreement, the
company’s claims and the site documents, which the Union
has had for 18 months.
Union
Claim:
Mr Eastlake says the partial lifting
of the lockout for 300 Affco workers “is not a gesture of
good will, but a gesture of production
needs.”
Fact:
The offer
to unlock covered all workers, not 300 as asserted by Mr
Eastlake. Had the union abided by the offer, the total
workforce would have been back in work within three
weeks.
Union
Claim:
“Workers were devastated when Affco
wouldn't guarantee it would lift the lockout for everyone at
yesterday's mediation. The company could actually extend the
suffering for those families that are still locked out if
the company get the workers back it sorely needs to meet the
cull cow season, which is now in full
swing."
Fact:
Last week
Affco offered to unlock all of the employees over a known
time frame, the Union rejected this offer. The company made
the offer to progressively unlock employees in an attempt to
meet the objectives of both parties, for Affco that is to
ensure meaningful bargaining occurs on claims to enhance the
chance of a resolution, and for the Union, their wish for
all their members to be unlocked over a known timeframe.
Affco has been working to ensure mediation is
constructive and is demonstrating good faith in making its
offers of return to work to the
Union.
ENDS