Use science and don’t delay fertiliser application
Media release for immediate use
4 August
2009
Use science and don’t delay fertiliser
application
Farmers who don’t apply any
fertiliser stand to lose significantly more from pasture
production loss than it would cost to maintain soil
fertility.
That’s the message Ballance
Agri-Nutrients chief executive Larry Bilodeau is giving to
the co-operative’s 18,500 farmer shareholders across the
country, stressing that farmers should step up their
scientific analysis to maximise the benefits from whatever
fertiliser they can afford.
‘I know I cannot be
seen to be an impartial adviser,’ Mr Bilodeau says, ‘but
we are concerned about the future productivity of farms
where fertiliser applications have been halted completely
for financial reasons. There is still great uncertainty in
the farming industry, and no suggestion that farm finances
are suddenly going to improve, but farmers should not hold
off on all fertiliser.
‘With many farmers
applying no fertiliser, or amounts well short of maintenance
levels, it is our duty to point out that even reduced
amounts of fertiliser will still pay dividends when backed
by smart science and precise analysis from our Technical
Sales Representatives.
‘While we can’t totally
rule out unforeseen events impacting on prices, our
expectation is that there will be no significant prices
changes before the summer, so farmers should not delay
application of spring fertiliser in expectation of further
price deceases.’
Ballance will still review its
prices on a three-monthly basis, he says, but the
co-operative is not intending to change prices on its
traditional 1 September review date.
Mr Bilodeau
says it is particularly important for those farmers who
skipped their usual autumn fertiliser application to know
how best to minimise the potential pasture production
loss.
‘Now is not the time to skimp on agronomic
(soil and pasture) testing on farms. In lean times more
money should be invested in testing to determine what areas
you can cut back on with little impact on your business, and
what areas should be given priority.
‘Our
technical sales representatives are skilled at adding value
to farmers’ operations. They are trained to help farmers
maximise farm outputs while minimising inputs, regardless of
whether this means a customer buys less fertiliser. I invite
farmers to use them to ensure the right product is applied
in the right place at the right time for the best economic
return.’
Warwick Catto, Head of Agro-Sciences
at Ballance, says the challenge now is to get the most out
of a sub-optimal situation by prioritising nutrient inputs,
looking at sulphur needs first, then potassium and then
phosphorus.
Mr Catto warns that sulphur could
become a limiting nutrient much more rapidly than
phosphorus, since it is more mobile and is lost more rapidly
from the system. He suggests nitrogen should be viewed as
the cost of buying additional feed, rather than as a
fertiliser, as its effects are shorter
term.
‘Used tactically, N-fertiliser such as
n-rich urea is one of the most useful tools available to
farmers to boost growth,’ says Mr Catto. ‘N-rich urea is
generally going to produce the cheapest feed at 10-15 c/kg
DM. On some soil types where spring S levels can limit N
responses, a product like N-rich ammo, which contains
sulphate sulphur, can give better responses than standard
urea.’
The priority order for applying fertiliser
to paddocks should be crops, then new pastures, then old
pastures, he advises.
‘Where possible, farmers
should use the results of agronomic testing to cluster
paddocks into different management units according to their
fertiliser requirements, and apply fertiliser only to those
areas that need it.’
In lower soil fertility
positions, fertiliser should be applied as early as possible
to push for early spring growth.
‘Farmers will
get the maximum benefits of any fertiliser investment this
spring by getting it on the paddocks as soon as the
conditions are right. There is nothing to be gained from
waiting.’
ENDS