Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Election eve law change wrong on many counts

Media statement Friday, 24th October, 2008

Election eve law change wrong on many counts

Trevor Mallard's latest plan is to say everyone off work for seven days or more has suffered a serious harm injury, says Paul Jarvie, Health and Safety Manager for the Employers and Manufacturers Association (Northern).

"This is wrong in principle and timing," Mr Jarvie said.

"It's wrong to make changes to the health and safety laws unilaterally without Parliamentary scrutiny at any time let alone controversial changes such as this, and on the eve of the election.

"Serious harm cannot be judged simply by how long someone is away from work.

"Such a law change would open up employers to a floodgate of litigation.

"Under Mr Mallard's proposal an employer who has an employee off work for seven days or more would face a Department of Labour investigation and possible prosecution.

"The change in definition would be by Order in Council by the end of the year.

"All employers will back our call for Mr Mallard to state clearly he will not make any changes in the lead up to the election."

ENDS

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.