Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Video | Agriculture | Confidence | Economy | Energy | Employment | Finance | Media | Property | RBNZ | Science | SOEs | Tax | Technology | Telecoms | Tourism | Transport | Search

 

Commission bans contributory mortgage broker

News release

19 December 2006

Securities Commission bans contributory mortgage broker

The Securities Commission has banned Contributory Mortgage Investments Ltd (CMI) from acting as contributory mortgage broker for two of its mortgages.

Crichton Horne & Associates Mortgage Brokers Limited has been appointed as contributory mortgage broker for these mortgages.

CMI has also been banned from offering interests in contributory mortgages to the public for four months. During this time the Commission will continue to review CMI’s operations to determine whether any other action should be taken.

The Commission considers CMI breached the Contributory Mortgage Regulations in relation to the two mortgages, which were the Otahuna Property Limited first and second mortgages, by:

• paying investors’ money to the borrower when it ought to have known that the offer document for the Otahuna first mortgage was misleading as it failed to disclose that the security for the first mortgage was limited to a priority amount; and by

• failing to notify investors of the borrower’s default and the action CMI was taking in respect of the default, within a reasonable time.

“CMI has not met the standards of care and good governance expected of those who raise funds from the public. It is in the public interest to prohibit further fundraising until the extent of CMI’s failure to comply with the law is fully established.” Jane Diplock said.

CMI told the Commission about its failure to disclose that the security for the first mortgage was limited to a priority amount and admitted it has a conflict of interest in the continued management of these mortgages. CMI’s failure to disclose to first mortgage investors that their security was limited to a priority amount may give grounds for an action against it by those investors. In these circumstances although CMI proposed steps intended to manage the conflict the Commission considers that the only realistic way to manage a conflict of this nature is for an independent party to represent the interests of investors.

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

CMI has a history of securities law breaches. In 2004 it was convicted for providing misleading information to investors in relation to a contributory mortgage and for paying investors’ money to a borrower when there were insufficient funds to complete the development for which the money was being lent, events occurring in 2000.

Earlier this year the Commission accepted an enforceable undertaking from CMI in relation to events occurring in 2004 and 2005. The undertaking is available on the Commission’s website at http://www.sec-com.govt.nz.


Ends

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Business Headlines | Sci-Tech Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.