Canterbury Regional Council (Environment Canterbury) is getting ready to have a challenging conversation with the
community about its work plan and budget for the next ten years.
As part of the development of the Long-Term Plan 2024-34, details of a draft consultation document and supporting
material have been published in the agenda for next Wednesday’s Council meeting (February 28).
It lays out different options for delivering the three core services that the Council is responsible for: Environmental
Regulation and Protection, Community Preparedness and Response to Hazards, and Public Transport.
Council Chair Peter Scott said this is the community’s first chance to see what might be on the table, although the
proposals are not yet final and are subject to public feedback.
“I admit, many people switch off when they hear the words ‘Long-Term Plan.’ But you need to understand we’re talking
about our budget. This is an essential piece of work that provides visibility around how ratepayers’ money could be
spent.”
Climate change resilience – including flood protection infrastructure, future-proofing public transport, and better pest
management and biodiversity outcomes, underpin much of the proposed work.
Scott said Councillors have been judicious in their approach, spending many hours dissecting the various options.
“We’ve tried to find as many savings as possible but as I’ve previously signalled, a significant rates hike is likely as
we try to balance rising costs and inflation with the community’s – and Government’s – growing expectations.
“We’ve got a lot of challenges ahead of us, including around flood protection and meeting our public transport needs.
We’ll continue to push for Central Government to come to the party, but funding will be tight. We’re walking a
tightrope, just like you do with your household budget, and I hope you’ll see that reflected in the packages put
forward.”
The proposed work plan could come with a $346 million price-tag for the first year alone, requiring a 24.2 percent
increase in revenue the Council collect from rates. However, the actual amount each property pays will vary - depending
on where it is, its value, and the services it receives.
For example, a property in urban Christchurch with a CV of $820,000 could expect to pay an extra $136.27 for services
provided to it, compared to the 2023/24 year. A property in rural Ashburton with a CV of $4,760,000 could expect to pay
an extra $523.99.
Scott says public feedback will be crucial to inform Council’s decision-making.
“Are we prioritising the things important to you? If you wanted reduced costs, which services would you be happy to see
cut back? If you don’t think we’ve got it right – tell us. If you think we’ve hit the nail on the head – tell us that
too.”
If councillors choose to adopt the consultation document next Wednesday, it will go out for public consultation in
mid-March, when people can make formal submissions.
Until then, Scott encourages everyone to have a look through the draft document so they can start thinking about the
options being considered.
“Remember, this is your money. How we spend it, and what your community gets for it, will be up to you.”
A further statement will be issued following Council’s decision on February 28.