“The Simpson Review’s proposal to restructure the healthcare system should be aligned with other reforms to enable a
coordinated approach to public service governance, planning, funding and delivery,” says Infrastructure New Zealand CEO
Paul Blair.
“The Health and Disability System Review chaired by Heather Simpson found that while New Zealand continues to have a
good public health system internationally, it was now under serious stress.
“This finding is supported by analysis released last week that found an average of $1.4 billion per annum of capital
investment in healthcare would be required over the next decade. This is around three times what DHBs spent in the past
decade and illustrates just how large the backlog is in one aspect of health service delivery.
“It is not clear from this report how additional health operating and capital expenditure needs will be met. True
innovation in service delivery will be required to bring in partners, adopt tele-health, and leverage iwi and third
sector providers.
“The Simpson Review comes at the same time as the Government is reviewing water services and the planning system, as
well as investigating electricity prices, port infrastructure and is considering support to local government through the
COVID-19 crisis.
“Throw in known and severe issues in transport and housing, plus $136 billion worth of demand for ‘shovel-ready’
projects, and it is very clear that the public purse is highly stretched and a major rethink of domestic public service
provision is required.
“Who should deliver public services, who should fund them and how do we get the range of public service providers
working together collaboratively and coherently?
“Demand for health services often sits at the end of a very long chain of public policy decisions in transport, water,
housing, education, welfare, justice and other sectors.
“We need alignment in the way decisions across these sectors are made, certainty of investment and the ability for both
national and local priorities to be represented.
“There is no such alignment currently and it is undermining our ability to plan spatially, invest to meet growth and
recognise when things are going wrong.
“There are over twelve different interpretations of what constitutes a region in New Zealand for the purposes of
administering public services, in addition to the existing 20 DHB areas. (Click here to see a map from the McGuinness Institute). Each has its own boundaries, decision making processes and funding
streams.
“More important than a reduction in the number of DHB areas, as per the Simpson report, is regions with agreed
governance, investment, funding, partnership and planning arrangements across transport, health, education and other
public services.
“That would enable delivery of regional spatial plans. We could then align health investments with those in transport
and other sectors based around improving public outcomes, rather than minimising the fiscal cost of each service within
each silo.
“That is what we need to get on top of simultaneous crises across almost all of our key public services.
“But it can’t happen if the Simpson report’s findings are progressed independent of wider reform initiatives underway.
“New Zealand needs a much more fundamental discussion around who makes decisions for public services, where the money
comes from and who is held to account if things go wrong,” Blair says.
A copy of Infrastructure New Zealand’s Building Regions Report can be found here.