Lake Horowhenua Trust now without trustees
by Veronica Harrod
Lake Horowhenua Trust now has no trustees after an historic decision by the Maori Appellate Court quashed their
appointment.
Late last week three judges decided in favour of Lake Horowhenua owner Philip Taueki who challenged Judge Doogan's
decision of 19 May 2016 appointing 11 Lake Horowhenua trustees on the grounds Judge Doogan had a conflict of interest.
Mr Taueki made his application appealing the appointment of trustees by Judge Doogan after the Maori Appellate Court
found on 8 March 2018 that Judge Doogan had a conflict of interest in an appeal by another Lake Horowhenua owner Charles
Rudd in another case involving the Lake Horowhenua Trust.
Mr Rudd’s appeal was based on comments Judge Doogan made in his court case about his previous professional involvement
with the Muaūpoko Tribal Authority and Lake Horowhenua Trust chair Matthew Sword.
The court judgement on Mr Rudd’s appeal stated, "That case raised the issue of apparent bias. We held that a
fair-minded, impartial and properly informed observer could reasonably have thought that Judge Doogan might not bring an
impartial mind to the matters before him.”
It was after the decision in Mr Rudd's appeal was released by the Maori Appellate Court that Mr Taueki filed his
application seeking a previous decision Judge Doogan made to appoint 11 Lake Horowhenua trustees be quashed.
The court judgement further stated, "It is appropriate that we hear Mr Taueki’s appeal. It involves the same trust, the
same judge, and arguments similar to those that Mr Rudd pursued before us."
"The fully-informed observer would also have known – although Mr Taueki did not – that Judge Doogan formerly acted for
the Muaūpoko Tribal Authority, and that Matthew Sword, who had since become chair of the Lake Horowhenua Trust, was
Judge Doogan’ instructing solicitor."
"Against this background, our answer to the question of whether a fair-minded fully informed observer would have a
reasonable apprehension that the judge might not bring an impartial mind to the matters before him is ‘yes’.
"The judge formerly acted for the Muaūpoko Tribal Authority; the judge’s instructing solicitor at that time had become
chair of the Lake Horowhenua Trust; and persons active in the Muaūpoko Tribal Authority were seeking appointment as
trustees of the Lake Horowhenua Trust although subject to objection from Mr Taueki and others," stated the Maori
Appellate Court judgement.
"Given the troubled history of this trust and the objections raised, the appointment as trustees of the 11
highest-polling candidates cannot be regarded as a fait accompli. Judge Doogan exercised judgement not to inquire into
the objections, and proceeded to appoint strictly in accordance with the poll. This was not an inevitable, nor indeed
necessarily a desirable, course. There was enquiry to be made, and Judge Doogan, given his former professional
relationship with key players, was not the judge to undertake that enquiry.”