Scoop has an Ethical Paywall
Licence needed for work use Learn More

Local Govt | National News Video | Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Search

 

Some benefits for nature in Auckland Unitary Plan

Some benefits for nature in Auckland Unitary Plan – if it’s managed well

29 July 2016

The Auckland Unitary Plan (AUP) has set some positive objectives for nature – but whether these can be achieved with the level of intensification being proposed is an important area for scrutiny, according to Forest & Bird, New Zealand’s leading conservation organisation.

Forest & Bird submitted extensively during the three-year planning process and believes that there are wins and losses for Auckland’s biodiversity, landscapes and waterways in the Plan. Wins include new rulings around the quality of waterways.

“We’re pleased to see the panel have made a commitment to maintain excellent or good quality water in the region’s rivers and streams and improve degraded water, but it will be how this is managed in the face of such a high level of intensification that will be the key,” says Forest & Bird Solicitor Sally Gepp.

“The policies and rules to achieve these and other outcomes require greater scrutiny and we are now looking in greater detail at whether the Plan rules will safeguard these new objectives in the face of development.”

Other wins that were fought for include increased protection for mangroves.

“In general all proposals to remove mangroves will now require resource consents and we are pleased that the panel accepted evidence from Forest & Bird Seabird Advocate Karen Baird and other ecologists about the importance of mangroves as habitat for threatened species and as a buffer against coastal erosion.”

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading

Areas for concern however include the pressure on Significant Ecological Areas (SEAs) such as bush remnants, wetlands, and important coastal habitat.

“The SEA policies are seeking to be all things to all people and there are no clear environmental bottom lines,” says Ms Gepp.

“If we do challenge the Plan, it will be because we have come to the view that it does not implement important biodiversity, landscape or water quality policies laid down in national policy documents, like the NZ Coastal Policy Statement, that the Plan must implement.”

Over 1500 hours of staff time have been spent during the hearings process by Forest & Bird’s legal team since December 2013, Experts also provided many hours voluntarily to be the voice for nature on these key policies for Auckland’s environment.

ENDS

© Scoop Media

Advertisement - scroll to continue reading
 
 
 
Parliament Headlines | Politics Headlines | Regional Headlines

 
 
 
 
 
 
 

LATEST HEADLINES

  • PARLIAMENT
  • POLITICS
  • REGIONAL
 
 

Featured News Channels


 
 
 
 

Join Our Free Newsletter

Subscribe to Scoop’s 'The Catch Up' our free weekly newsletter sent to your inbox every Monday with stories from across our network.