Commission decision on ‘affected area’ for North Rodney application
The Local Government Commission has made a decision on the “affected area’’ for the application from the Northern Action
Group (NAG) for a North Rodney unitary authority, separate from Auckland Council.
The Commission has determined that all of the Auckland Council area is the affected area, rather than just North Rodney.
In doing so it determined that the operational scale, scope or capability of Auckland Council would be materially
affected if local government in the North Rodney area were to be reorganised as proposed by NAG. An explanation and
summary of the Commission’s reasons can be found atwww.lgc.govt.nz
As required under Clause 8, Schedule 3 of the Local Government Act 2002, the Commission has also determined there is
demonstrable community support in the Auckland Council district for local government reorganisation in the area affected
by the application. The Commission is not required to determine that a majority of persons in an affected area support
reorganisation. A summary of the Commission’s reasons can be found at www.lgc.govt.nz
The Commission will now call for alternative applications. These are other suggested local government arrangements
relating to the Auckland Council area, which can be made by any person, body or group. It will then decide on its
preferred local government option. If the preferred option is not the status quo, the Commission will then begin
developing a draft reorganisation proposal before consulting further with the community and gauging public support for
it.
“The Commission will be inviting ideas and suggestions from people and parties interested in local government in the
Auckland Council area,’’ said Commission Chair Sir Wira Gardiner. “We look forward to receiving and considering these.’’
Background
• The Local Government Commission received an application from Northern Action Group (NAG) for the constitution of
a North Rodney Council as a unitary authority separate from Auckland Council in November 2013.
•
• On 30 June 2014 the Commission declined to assess the application principally on the grounds that to do so would
not be in the public interest.
•
• NAG appealed to the High Court and, in April 2015, the High Court said the Commission was wrong in law on the
public interest ground.
•
• In August 2015, having received and considered further information from NAG, the Commission decided to assess
the application.
Local Government Reorganisation: summary
The process for local government reorganisations under the Local Government Act 2002 is (broadly):
• Individuals, organisations or the Minister of Local Government can apply to the Commission for reorganisation of
local government.
•
• If the Commission decides to assess the application, it will then determine the ‘’affected area’’.
•
• If the Commission determines there is general support in the district of each affected territorial authority for
local government reorganisation in the affected area, it will give public notice of the application and call for
alternative applications.
•
• An alternative application must comply with the requirements for a reorganisation application (as set out in LGA
2002, Schedule 3, Clauses 5 and 10).
•
• The Commission then identifies reasonably practicable options for local government for the affected area – which
must include the status quo.
•
• From the reasonably practicable options, the Commission identifies its preferred option.
•
• If the preferred option is not the status quo, it develops a draft proposal.
•
• A draft proposal is subject to consultation, including submissions and in some cases a hearing or a series of
hearings.
•
• If the Commission decides to proceed it issues a final proposal. Otherwise it can choose to end the process, or
identify a new draft proposal for consultation.
•
• If requested by the community a poll on the final proposal is held.
•
• If no poll is requested or the poll shows the necessary level of support for the final proposal, the final
proposal is implemented.
ends