Webstock 2014 Offers Business Advice With Caveats
Webstock 2014 Offers Business Advice With Caveats
By Jamie Neikrie
This past week Wellington welcomed technology
experts from across the world for the ninth annual Webstock
conference.
As well as helping fuel Wellington’s
tech surge, Webstock has been hailed as one of the premier
technology conferences in the world, known for its diverse,
dynamic speakers.
This years conference featured young
upstarts like Hannah Donovan, tech industry rebels like
Maciej Ceglowski, and veterans like graphic designer Paula
Scher.
Webstock tends to focus more on the business
and creative side of the industry than the technical
aspects. You will never hear instructions for writing code
or constructing complicated algorithms at Webstock, a style
that has its detractors. At $1500 a ticket, some
participants feel that they should come away with concrete
information or training that would take months if they
attempted to learn the material on their own.
Others feel
that the tone and substance of the talks made the conference
more accessible and universal to everyone in the tech
industry, not just coders and programmers.
Within
that framework, the conference hosted guests from across the
tech spectrum, from graphic designers to music aficionados
to social programmers. Scoop was lucky enough to attend the
conference’s closing day, which featured out-of-the-box
talks from South African electronic musician Spoek Mathambo
and Tom Loosemore, who helped create the United Kingdom’s
Government Digital Service, which will soon serve as the
blueprint for New Zealand’s government websites.
While many of the talks featured uplifting tips like
“Let actions create motivation,” or “Start with
something shit,” there seemed to be a dark undertone to
this year’s conference.
Many of the closing day’s
guests, including Ceglowski and designer Sha Hwang used
their platform to offer a warning to the sold-out crowd.
With the recent revelations about the United States’
metadata collection program, they offered the sentiment that
the tech industry has become corrupted and co-opted. Hwang
described the feeling as “a loss of
innocence.”
Cegloski, among others, focused on the
dark underbelly of the tech industry’s business side.
Waxing nostalgically for the days when the tech industry was
a plucky upstart on the fringe of the business world,
Cegloski told the story of Victor Theremin, whose inventions
were repeatedly stolen and used by the Russian government to
spy on their enemies. The message in short: we have created
a dangerous tool.
Melodramatics aside, Ceglowski is
right about the industry’s success. Apple is the most
valuable company in the world. Google, behind dozens of
highly publicized purchases of other tech companies, just
passed Exxon Mobil as the second most valuable company.
Webstock, for its part, recognizes that the tech industry
offers a world of wealth and power. And it embraces that
fact by focusing on business and creative processes.
In 2005, when Webstock began here in Wellington, the
tech industry was the upstart Ceglowski described. Since
then, as the industry has flourished, so has Wellington,
behind companies like Xero. There is no question that
technology is a slippery slope, and that we need better laws
to regulate it, to protect it from corruption. But, given
the choice, would any tech insider really want to turn back
the clock on the industry’s progress. Sha put it best when
he said, “We are no longer looking from the outside. We
already won.”