Fake News By Omission: The Mass Media’s Cowardly Distortion Tool
Western mass media have continued their conspiracy of silence on the OPCW scandal, making no significant mention yet
this month of the leaks which have been emerging from the Organisation for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons
indicating that the US, France and UK bombed Syria last year in retaliation for a chemical weapons attack which probably
never occurred, and that OPCW leadership helped cover it up.
If you haven't been following the still-unfolding OPCW scandal, you can catch up quickly by watching this seven-minute video
A leaked email accuses the OPCW of doctoring a report to suit the US government’s justification for its illegal bombing
of Syria in April 2018. I explain the scandal mainstream media is trying to supress: pic.twitter.com/MTS4OWwqkH
— Dan Cohen (@dancohen3000) November 28, 2019
Mass media's silence on this hugely important story is noteworthy not just because it has far-reaching consequences for
the future of the Syrian regime change agenda
and for public trust in US-led war narratives
, not just because the leaks
have already been independently authenticated
by the mainstream press, and not just because scandalous revelations about powerful entities are normally the sort of
incendiary click fodder that makes a mainstream news editor hasten behind his desk to hide his arousal. It is also
noteworthy because we're being told by people in the know that even more leaks are coming.
"Much more to come about the censoring of the facts on Douma at the Poison Gas Watchdog OPCW," tweeted
journalist Peter Hitchens earlier today. "It really is time that the Grand Unpopular Press and the BBC, realised this
is a major story. Are they too proud to admit they might have been wrong?"
Hitchens, who was among the very first
to publish the leaked internal OPCW email last month revealing multiple glaring plot holes in the official narrative
about the alleged chlorine gas attack in Douma, Syria, has been saying this for a while now.
"More is known by the whistleblowers of the OPCW than has yet been released, but verification procedures have slowed
down its release," Hitchens wrote in his blog
last week. "More documents will, I expect, shortly come to light."
So this is still an unfolding story that is only going to get more scandalous in the coming days. Yet rather than
reporting on an important news story (which it may surprise you to learn is actually supposed to be the literal job
description of the news media), the mainstream press has been silent. The only times the mass media have commented on
this major story has been to spin it as Russian disinformation
, and Tucker Carlson's segment
on it last week which was also falsely
spun as disinfo by establishment narrative managers like David Brock's Media Matters for America
It may be hard for some to grasp this concept, but not telling people about something that *did* happen gives them just
as incorrect knowledge about reality as does telling them something did happen which actually did not. That's why "fake
news" (by omission) is the right term. https://t.co/9p1yioLydc
— Left I on the News (@leftiblog) December 4, 2019
The blog Left I on the News
uses the term "fake news by omission
" to describe this obnoxious yet ubiquitous propaganda tactic, where imperial media outlets deliberately distort
people's understanding of what's going on in the world by simply declining to cover news stories which are inconvenient
to the establishment narrative.
Refusing to tell people about things that did happen distorts their worldview just as much as telling them things that did not happen, yet mass media will never be held accountable for engaging in the former, while engaging in the latter forces
them to print embarrassing retractions and lose credibility with the public. For this reason, fake news by omission is
their preferred tactic of deceit.
People sometimes think of the mainstream media as always straight-up lying all the time, just fabricating stories whole
cloth about what's going on, but that isn't generally how it works. A good liar doesn't lie all the time, and they don't
even tell full lies unless absolutely necessary. What they do is far more cowardly and far more effective: they spin,
they distort, they tell half-truths, they emphasise insignificant details and marginalize significant ones, they
uncritically report what government officials are telling them, and they lie by omission.
However, the total disappearance of the OPCW leaks is unusual for the legacy media. The imperial press have had their
ways of hiding inconvenient stories since newspapers began. Running stories late on a Friday, running them on the
"graveyard page" of page 2 (so-called because stories go there to die), holding on to them until another big story
breaks so they can be published relatively unnoticed, waiting for them to be broken in a disreputable publication so
people will be skeptical of it (sometimes known as "fixing" a story), or running an oppositional op-ed at the same time
to spin the uncomfortable facts in a more salubrious way. But in the end, they usually run the story, in one way or
another, so they can be seen not to be censoring.
Not this time though. The exceptional silence on the OPCW scandal from imperial news media, in and of itself, discredits
them completely. But people won't know about it unless they are told. Spread the word.
Thanks for reading! The best way to get around the internet censors and make sure you see the stuff I publish is to
subscribe to the mailing list for my website
, which will get you an email notification for everything I publish. My work is entirely reader-supported
, so if you enjoyed this piece please consider sharing it around, liking me on Facebook
, following my antics on Twitter
, checking out my podcast on either Youtube
, Apple podcasts
, following me on Steemit
, throwing some money into my hat on Patreon
, purchasing some of my sweet merchandise
, buying my new book Rogue Nation: Psychonautical Adventures With Caitlin Johnstone
, or my previous book Woke: A Field Guide for Utopia Preppers
. For more info on who I am, where I stand, and what I'm trying to do with this platform, click here
. Everyone, racist platforms excluded, has my permission
to republish or use any part of this work (or anything else I’ve written) in any way they like free of charge.