A Council on Hemispheric Affairs Press Release
About COHA In the News Forum Internships
Obama on Latin American Trade: Muddled and Confused
Uribe—Latin America’s Most Disgraced President
• Legacy of Colombia’s violation of Ecuador’s sovereignty will be a heavy cross for Uribe to bear.
• Honored in Washington, Uribe is scorned throughout Latin America for being Bush’s favored hemispheric figure.
However muffled the language may be, President Uribe is destined to be Latin America’s most scorned president in modern
times. Condemned by voice and written denunciations throughout the hemisphere, Uribe did manage to solely win
enthusiastic, if almost meaningless praise, from lame-duck President George Bush, who saw nothing wrong with Colombia
applying Iraqi-style tactics on Ecuadorian territory. Even the most accommodating analyst would have to inform Uribe
that he has just finished the most catastrophic week of an already catastrophic presidency and effectively the demise of
his presidency and influenced on the hemisphere. There is no question that, ironically enough, Farcista Raúl Reyes has
posthumously inflicted the most devastating and lasting defeat on Uribe. Metaphorically speaking, Reyes has scalped
Uribe and then hung the Colombian leader’s tattered presidential sash upon a pike and walked the macabre sight through
the streets of Latin America.
A Heavy Burden to Bear
At the end of the day, the price of gunning down Reyes will prove to be excessively high for Uribe. On going
negotiations for the release of scores of FARC-held hostages, which has eagerly sought after by Uribe, have been
unquestionably terminated, at least for the foreseeable future. Reyes was the FARC figure most identified with the
hostage-release dialogue with Colombia and European intermediates. In the past, Reyes was the FARC official most engaged
in talks that had taken place with high level figures abroad, working for the release of a number of FARC detainees,
particularly Ingrid Betancourt, whose freedom was especially sought after by the French, due to her holding both
Colombian and French citizenship. Additionally, Reyes was said to have maintained liaison with Venezuela’s efforts,
which had been abruptly guillotined last November, when Hugo Chávez was sacked by Uribe as Colombia’s unofficial
negotiator. By ordering the killing of Reyes, Uribe guaranteed that fo rmer Colombian presidential candid ate Ingrid
Betancourt will remain in guerrilla custody indefinitely.
A Man for Few Seasons
Uribe cultivates a hard-line image that brooks no flexibility when it comes to visiting affliction upon the Farcistas,
which has won him considerable popularity within Colombia. But it is a popularity that is more broad than deep. As for
FARC, it is not a soft and fuzzy organization at all, but it must be understood that all of their actions have an end in
mind. Behind the drug trafficking and kidnappings lies a resolve to obtain the freedom of their imprisoned comrades and
to guarantee their own securities. Yet here again, Uribe’s instincts were antipathetic to a rational assessment of how
to peacefully resolve on internecine strife that had been going on for decades, with honor and with homage to the
Colombian nations.
Now prepared to retire from office, the Bush administration already has reached the nadir of its popularity on the Hill
and when it comes to its Latin American policy, no one can suggest that it was even faintly credible. In fact, Bush’s
policy was a parody of a policy; in effect, with no exaggeration, it could be called an anti-policy. Uribe is unlikely
to witness the U.S. Congress passing a beneficial trade measure on his behalf. In terms of the high price that Uribe is
being forced to pay, the toll is there to clearly be seen.
The Colombian president does not have a compelling reputation which can make him proud. Uribe is anything but an apostle
of democracy. He is armed with a grim personality that is more Dick Cheneyesque in impact than Helen Keller, he had no
problem with packing the country’s Supreme Court when he was encountering problems in convincing it to make a decision
that the Constitution would allow him to be re-elected.
Nor did the U.S. make much of a fuss when, for a token guilty plea and a minimum prison sentence, AUC vigilantes are
guaranteed against being extradited to the U.S., even though the extradition policy had been at the heart of
Washington’s anti-drug strategy. Another sore point is Uribe’s reputation for playing fast and loose when it comes to
personal matters of corruption, and his years of very murky connections to some of the country’s worst rightist
extremists. He has worked tirelessly to provide these AUC extremist vigilantes (classified as “terrorists” even by the
State Department) to see to it that their future isn’t bleak even now, many of the people who Uribe protected from doing
jail time have gone back to a life of major drug trafficking. In a recurring scandal involving Uribe, some 35% of the
legislative representatives of his conservative party have direct ideological and/or financial arrangements with these
death-squads. Nor should it be forgotten that even the St ate Department acknowledges that t he AUC was tolerated and
afforded sweetheart deals by Uribe while it still was carrying out massacres of trade union leaders and hundreds of
other civilians.
Larry Birns
Director of COHA
Obama on Latin American Trade: Muddled and Confused
As the U.S. presidential campaign heats up, Barack Obama, a contender for the Democratic Party nomination, has been
reluctant to discuss U.S. policy towards Latin America. In recent years, the region has undergone a major tectonic shift
towards the left, prompting many to wonder how the young Illinois Senator might deal with progressive economic change if
elected President.
In South America, there has been considerable resistance to the Bush Administration’s free trade initiatives. Hugo
Chávez of Venezuela has even set up his own trade and barter scheme, the Bolivarian Alternative to The Americas (or
ALBA), as a foil to Washington’s private sector model. Realizing that it cannot push through a hemispheric-wide free
trade initiative, the Bush administration has sought individual free trade agreements on a country-by-country basis.
However, recent deals have been questioned by many due to their lack of regard for adequate labor and environmental
mandates.
ends