The President's Speech on Iraq Reconstruction
Statement By Rep. Henry A. Waxman
Wednesday 07 December 2005
The President's claims today are mindboggling. Either he doesn't understand the facts or simply doesn't want to face
them. The reconstruction of Iraq has been an enormous boondoggle - not an example of "quiet, steady progress."
Halliburton has repeatedly overcharged American taxpayers through fraud, waste, and abuse. The U.S. officials in charge
of the reconstruction have been incompetent and, in some cases, corrupt. And billions of dollars have been squandered
without increasing oil or electricity production.
Key Facts about the Reconstruction
Lack of Progress.
Massive spending on reconstruction has produced little or no progress in key sectors like electricity and oil. Despite
a $2.2 billion investment in Iraq's oil infrastructure, production and export levels have actually dropped below pre-war
levels. And despite the $4.4 billion the Bush Administration spent to boost Iraq's electricity production, it has fallen
far short of its goal of 6000 megawatts of peak output capacity. In fact, the Administration has conceded, "We'll never
meet demand." Iraqis living in Baghdad typically have just two hours of power followed by four hours without power
throughout the day.
Rampant Overcharges and Lax Oversight.
Large government contractors like Halliburton have repeatedly overcharged the taxpayer. Auditors at the Defense
Contract Audit Agency have identified over $1.4 billion in unreasonable and unsupported charges by Halliburton in Iraq.
Whistleblowers have testified about $100 bags of laundry, $45 cases of soda, and brand new $85,000 trucks being
abandoned because of a flat tire. Yet the Administration refuses to take action. Last month, the Defense Department paid
Halliburton $130 million in reimbursements, profits, and bonuses for billings that the department's own auditors
recommended against paying.
Incompetent Management.
The Bush Administration's management of the reconstruction of Iraq has been fundamentally incompetent. Billion-dollar
contracts were awarded with little or no competition to favored contractors. Competition for discrete reconstruction
projects was suppressed by dividing Iraq into a handful of fiefdoms and awarding lucrative monopoly contracts to
companies that never had to compete against each other for specific reconstruction tasks.
Burgeoning Corruption.
Between May 2003 and June 2004, U.S. officials shipped nearly $12 billion in cash to Iraq. As government audits later
found, the cash was spent and disbursed by U.S. officials with virtually no financial controls or reliable accounting.
The Administration cannot account for over $8 billion that was transferred to Iraqi ministries. This unsupervised flood
of cash into Iraq became an open invitation to corruption. A senior U.S. official already has been charged with
accepting hundreds of thousands of dollars in bribes and kickbacks from a U.S. contractor in exchange for steering up to
$3.5 million in fraudulent contracts his way. Government investigators have said that there are dozens of other criminal
corruption cases being processed.
ENDS